Evaluate and then suggest the most important problem with top-down models of policy implementation by citing at least two problems associated with this model.
PREVIOUS POST WAS INCORRECT Week 10 discussion 1 & 2 must be answered in format listed below:DISCUSSION 1The Underwear Bomber Please respond to the following:· In the textbook, Birkland argues that the underwear bomber case tipped the balance in favor of using screening machines that showed a clearer image of a screened passengers body under his or her own clothes. Take a position on the following question and provide support for your position: Do you agree that public sentiment supports the use of such machines?· Take a position on the following question and provide support for your position: Does the failed attempt to bomb Northwest Airlines flight 253 in 2009 (underwear bomber) reflect policy failure or policy success? Here is a checklist for you to consider as you construct responses for Discussion Question 10.1:>> Did you take a position on screeners? 4 pts)>> Did you pick between policy failure or success with justification? (2 pts)>> Is your post free of grammatical and typing errors? (1 pts)>> Is your post longer than 250 words? (1 pts)>> Did you provide substantive responses to at least one other post? (2 pts) DISCUSSION 2Top-Down vs. Bottom-Up Based on the lecture, address the following:· Evaluate and then suggest the most important problem with top-down models of policy implementation by citing at least two problems associated with this model. · Evaluate and then discuss whether bottom-up approaches address these problems. · Analyze the bottom-up shortcomings.· On balance, evaluate which model you think would best aid someone who is attempting to design a policy and support your reasons. Here is a checklist for you to consider as you construct responses for Discussion Question 10.2:>> Did you cite two problems with the top down model? (2 pts)>> Did you make a claim about how bottoms-up addresses the problems? (1 pts)>> Did you assess bottoms-up weaknesses? (2 pts)>> Did you analyze the whole model? (1 pts)>> Is your post free of grammatical and typing errors? (1 pts)>> Is your post longer than 250 words? (1 pts) >> Did you provide substantive responses to at least one other post? (2 pts)
