Cambridge and Chelmsford Modern Philosophy Kants Discussion

please respond to. Cesar. with 250. wordsAnalytic propositions are true or not true by virtue of their meaning, whereas synthetic propositions’ truth derives from how their meaning relates to the world. Examples of analytic propositions include: “All bachelors are unmarried.” “All triangles have three sides.” An example of a synthetic proposition could be “Mary had a little lamb” since its truth depends on whether she had a little lamb. Priori knowledge is the knowledge that can be had directly without relying sense knowledge while posteriori knowledge is the knowledge that can be had only on the basis of sense experience. One prime example of priori knowledge would be a statement such as, ‘All squares are polygons.’ A person can know this fact based on the fact they know what a square and a polygon is. They don’t need to actually experience any squares in order to know that this statement is true of all squares. An example of posteriori knowledge can be this statement: ‘I know the Sun will set this evening because it always has.’ This posteriori knowledge tells me that the sun will set again.The principle behind analytic judgments is the criterion of the truth or falsehood of an affirmative analytic judgment is the principle of contradiction, which states that ‘No thing can have a predicate that contradicts it.’ Hume concludes that a priori reasoning can’t be the source of the connection between our ideas of a cause and its effect. Hume thinks that all synthetic judgments are a posteriori which means that every meaningful statement is known as true or false either by definition as it tells us nothing about the world or by experience. Causal inferences don’t concern relations of ideas.The question I wanted to ask from the text is: Can it be possible to have priori knowledge on a daily basis without even thinking about posteriori knowledge?