What is judicial activism? What is judicial restraint? Did you sense Toobins bias toward one judicial philosophy over another? If so, how did that bias, as well as his own political ideology, color Toobins analysis of the justices? If you were a judge, which judicial philosophy would you adopt, and why?
What is judicial activism? What is judicial restraint? Did you sense Toobins bias toward one judicial philosophy over another? If so, how did that bias, as well as his own political ideology, color Toobins analysis of the justices? If you were a judge, which judicial philosophy would you adopt, and why?
All papers must be at least 5 pages in length and no more than 8.
You must provide evidence in your paper that you read the entire book.