JP Services provides water services to Angela’s subdivision. After months of utilizing the water, JP Services sent her an invoice. She refused to pay it, as this service was not in her contract when she purchased the house so she said she is not obligated. What is the legal issue and for whom would the court rule?

JP Services provides water services to Angela’s subdivision. After months of utilizing the water, JP Services sent her an invoice. She refused to pay it, as this service was not in her contract when she purchased the house so she said she is not obligated. What is the legal issue and for whom would the court rule?

JP Services provides water services to Angela’s subdivision. After months of utilizing the water, JP Services sent her an invoice. She refused to pay it, as this service was not in her contract when she purchased the house so she said she is not obligated. What is the legal issue and for whom would the court rule?

JP Services provides water services to Angela’s subdivision. After months of utilizing the water, JP Services sent her an invoice. She refused to pay it, as this service was not in her contract when she purchased the house so she said she is not obligated. What is the legal issue and for whom would the court rule?

Jack signed a life insurance policy with his daughter as the sole beneficiary. Upon his passing, the daughter put in a claim for the money. Under what principle can she pursue this as someone who is vested?

Jack signed a life insurance policy with his daughter as the sole beneficiary. Upon his passing, the daughter put in a claim for the money. Under what principle can she pursue this as someone who is vested?

Lorraine sold her car to Hamid but didn’t tell him of the transmissions issue knowing that Hamid was relying on a good transmission. What is the legal issue and for whom would the court rule?

Lorraine sold her car to Hamid but didn’t tell him of the transmissions issue knowing that Hamid was relying on a good transmission. What is the legal issue and for whom would the court rule?

Desmin has been deemed incompetent by the court, however, is still exceptional with ability to do math perfectly. You hired him though he is a high functional and he performed the job. Identify the legal issue.

Desmin has been deemed incompetent by the court, however, is still exceptional with ability to do math perfectly. You hired him though he is a high functional and he performed the job. Identify the legal issue.

Deseree prior to a discussion with Peter, offered $500,000 as opposed to $5 million in a contract to Peter. Peter accepted. Deseree said it was a mistake and asked to rescind the contract. What is the legal issue and for whom would the court rule?

Deseree prior to a discussion with Peter, offered $500,000 as opposed to $5 million in a contract to Peter. Peter accepted. Deseree said it was a mistake and asked to rescind the contract. What is the legal issue and for whom would the court rule?

Hamad and Jerry agreed that Hamad would ship via a destination contract 10 pounds of corn☺ by May 1 to Jerry. On April 1st, Hamad sent Jerry a written notice that he would not be able to honor the agreement. What is the legal issue?

Hamad and Jerry agreed that Hamad would ship via a destination contract 10 pounds of corn☺ by May 1 to Jerry. On April 1st, Hamad sent Jerry a written notice that he would not be able to honor the agreement. What is the legal issue?

Darrius contracted with Nathaniel on February 1st to have 5 crates of bags shipped to Nathaniel via UPS by April 1st. There was a strike soon after for the following months prohibiting any shipments via UPS. Identify the legal issue.

Darrius contracted with Nathaniel on February 1st to have 5 crates of bags shipped to Nathaniel via UPS by April 1st. There was a strike soon after for the following months prohibiting any shipments via UPS. Identify the legal issue.

Mikey lost his rabbit and posted a picture of it and a $200 reward should someone brings the rabbit back to him. The postman unaware of the reward, was delivering the mail and noticed the rabbit and brought it to Mikey, as per the instructions on the collar as to the owner’s identity. When he delivered the rabbit, he learned of the reward and demanded it. What is the legal issue and for whom would the court rule?

Mikey lost his rabbit and posted a picture of it and a $200 reward should someone brings the rabbit back to him. The postman unaware of the reward, was delivering the mail and noticed the rabbit and brought it to Mikey, as per the instructions on the collar as to the owner’s identity. When he delivered the rabbit, he learned of the reward and demanded it. What is the legal issue and for whom would the court rule?

× How can I help you?