From the reading, give one example of western knowledge and IK knowledge being at odds with one another.
Reading due: Read the portions of the article that are not grayed out Watson, Annette. 2013. “Misunderstanding the ‘Nature’ of Co-Management: A Geography of Regulatory Science and Indigenous Knowledges (IK).” Environmental Management 52(5): 1085–1102.7
-Reading assignment due: In a few sentences answer: From the reading, give one example of western knowledge and IK knowledge being at odds with one another.
explain how this is an example of the bystander effect.
project on time.
Directions: Research the by stander effect. There are other cases besides Kitty Genovese. Find another case study about the bystander effect. Then you need to write 2 paragraphs about the alternative case of the bystander effect. In the first paragraph explain what happened in the case. In the second paragraph explain how this is an example of the bystander effect. Explain how people react and why they react the way they do.
• Each paragraph needs to be 8-10 sentences. (70%)
• Spelling, grammar, and punctuation will be evaluated. (20%)
How does transportation and logistics management impact customer experience?
Instructions
The purpose of this assignment is to record the work you have done finding a topic, building research questions, and doing a rhetorical analysis for your paper.
Place your three (3) research questions and thesis statement at the top of the page, below the required heading (name etc.) (MLA format) or after the title page (APA format), and answer the questions shown below. You do not have to answer these questions for each research question, just the one reflected in your thesis statement. Each question should be followed by a paragraph answer. Remember that your thesis statement should be a single, complete sentence that is NOT a question.
Keep it simple. Follow the format below, making your points precisely.
Write three of your research questions here (remember that, if the question can be answered by YES or NO, it is a closed-ended question that does not invite discussion and so should be revised):
Question 1.
Question 2.
Question 3.
Write your thesis statement here (one complete sentence that is not a question):
Write paragraphs that respond to the questions below, using your thesis statement as the basis for your answers:
What is my purpose in writing this paper? (A clear understanding of your purpose will help you decide what information to include in your paper and how to organize your paper.)
What do I already know about my topic? What are my feelings toward this topic? (You may have mixed feelings about the topic at the beginning. This may change as you do more research.)
What do my readers already know? What are my readers’ feelings toward the topic? (If your topic is a controversial one, think about the best way to present it to your audience. For example, think about your tone and word choice here.)
What do my readers need to know to understand my point? (You may understand and accept underlying assumptions about your topic, but your reader may not be aware of those.)
What information do I need to research and add to my paper? (You may need to familiarize yourself more thoroughly with the topic to make a strong presentation.)
The following will be the research question for my final paper:
1.How does transportation and logistics management impact customer experience?
2.What benefits of business technology in transportation and logistics to improve customer experience?
3.What can be done effectively by today’s transportation and logistics management leaders concerning customer service, innovation, process improvement, and other operational strategies that can positively impact customer experience to improve success?
How does Zach contrast the problems of implicit racism and more overt violations of human rights?
Reading: white privilege, Black rights
Naomi Zach
- How does Zach contrast the problems of implicit racism and more overt violations of human rights?
- How does Zach explain the need for criticism of police violence directed against young black men?
- What does Zach mean when she suggests that the issue of unpunished killings of black youth is a
What kinds of images are used on each site to support the stories?
C101 Sports & Media Exercise
Watch this video.on agenda setting and framing! Note that although the video refers primarily to these comments in relation to public policy, they can easily be extended to apply to any topic of interest to the general public or specific publics (e.g., sports fans).
Part 1
A simple, working definition of agenda setting by the media is the selection of which news stories to cover and what order of priority and emphasis to present them in.
For this part of the assignment, you will investigate differences in agenda setting across three different sports websites.
You should have 15-20 minutes to devote to taking notes and making observations of the three sites. This will be easier to do on a computer than a mobile phone. So, when you have this time to devote, open the HOMEPAGES for following three sites.
Do so AT THE SAME TIME on different tabs of a web browser:
ESPN: https://www.espn.com/
Fox Sports: https://www.foxsports.com/
BBC Sport: https://www.bbc.com/sport
Take notes on:
How each site prioritizes in the world of sports at that moment in time
Any single story that appears on the home page of only one of the sites. What type of story is it?
For a story appearing on all three sites, are there differences in how ‘big’ a story it seems?
What kinds of images are used on each site to support the stories?
These notes do not need to be turned in
Write and submit 1-2 paragraphs (at least 500 words) describing differences in how the agenda of sports news differed across the three sites.
Part 2
A simple, working definition of framing by the media is how the story is told (which elements are prioritized/excluded, which voices are heard, and how issues are discussed).
Find a single story that is covered by at least two of the sites but framed differently.
Write at least two paragraphs (approximately 200 words each) describing how the sites told the same story from a different perspective, providing examples from both sites to support your point. Be sure to put any quotations from the articles in quotation marks and cite the author/article.
Part 3
Take a look back at your notes on images. In terms of the homepages of each site, how do the visuals differ? What similarities do they share? How do these design/pictorial choices affect the reader’s overall experience of sports news?
Write a paragraph (at least 200 words) that analyzes each homepage’s visual elements by comparing them. Be sure to discuss what impact these visual choices have on the way each organization communicates sports news.
To summarize, your write-up should include the following elements:
Part 1: 1-2 paragraphs (at least 500 words) related to agenda setting
Part 2: 2 paragraphs (at least 200 words each) related to framing
Part 3: 1 paragraph (at least 200 words) addressing homepage visuals
Be sure to label each part of the assignment (Parts 1, 2 and 3) so it is clear how you are responding to the prompts.
Grading rubric:
A 10-point assignment will:
Have 4-5 paragraphs labeled and written in complete sentences
Each paragraph responds fully and thoughtfully to all the questions
Considers similarities and differences across the three sites
Demonstrates understanding of agenda setting and framing
Provides relevant examples, with quotations when appropriate, and proper citation
Video websit: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=12xwHhCntHA
Comments from Customer
Discipline: Media
Write a personal statement about a man’s experience with feminism as a student (in high school and college).
Write a personal statement about a man’s experience with feminism as a student (in high school and college). You can detail how I came to be a feminist (in high school). I was born, raised, and educated in Asia before coming to the United States to attend college. Describe in detail the feminist movements I was active in college. Identifying the books that had a significant influence on my consciousness.
Comments from Customer
Any book you can think of. This is not the main part of the writing. Please focus on the experience or activities related to the feminism.
What does the organization need to implement this payment system?
Parameters of Implementation
What does the organization need to implement this payment system?
Priorities (what are the priorities of your workplace?)
Budget (does your organization have the financial means to support it?)
Staff (does it have the staff/what type of staff to support it?)
Healthcare integration (does the organization need partnerships)
Buy-in from stakeholders (list examples: who are the stakeholders)
This link was proveded my proferssor with some referes .
https://www.aha.org/advocacy/current-and-emerging-payment-models
Instructions:
- include at least ONE current scholarly source. Please take note to the recent announcement from Prof Ro listing suggested references.
*may have one picture or graphic
*Followed current APA format including citation of references.
*Speaker notes expanded upon and clarified content on the slides.
State your position on one of these issues – are you for, against, or neutral? Explain why.
This is a discussion post so you can type out the question and type out the answer
Text book -Think Critically
Book by Carol A. Gittens and Peter A. Facione
Chapter 10 and 11
Initial Post Instructions
Consider one of the following current social issues – or one of your choice:
Gun violence
Racism
Economic inequality
Sexism
Violent crime
Immigration
For the initial post, address the following:
State your position on one of these issues – are you for, against, or neutral? Explain why. Avoid vagueness or ambiguity in your response. Make your position very clear.
Examine how you have formed that opinion.
How well do you think you know the facts?
Do you know and understand statistical information that applies to the issue?
Do you think you have formed your opinion using only System-1 thinking, or have you applied System-2?
What part have heuristics, cognitive bias, and dominance structuring played in how you have formed your opinions?
The initial post is not about how “correct” your position is; it is about how you arrived at your position on the issue. This discussion requires application of metacognition – thinking about how you think.
Follow-Up Post Instructions
Respond to at least one peer. Further the dialogue by providing more information and clarification.
In your responses, look for another student’s post, either on the same or a different issue. Choose, where possible, a peer whose initial post has not yet been examined by another student, and examine it. Do you agree or disagree with your peer?
Is your initial reaction to your peer “So, right; you bet!” or is it “So wrong, you’re all wet!”
Examine carefully your thinking in response to your peers:
What part, if any, have facts, heuristics, or dominance structuring played in your response?
What part, if any, has cognitive bias played in your response?
You should also look at responses to your initial post:
Did your peer fairly evaluate you? Discuss this with your peer.
You may find that just the minimum three posts are not sufficient to discover whether you can identify these elements. You will have to make a judgement call: do the minimum three and miss out on the deep thinking required by this exercise, or go beyond the minimum three and really begin to understand your thought processes and the concept of critical thinking.
A very valuable final post would be to discuss your judgment call: perhaps you “got it” in three; perhaps you opted for more than three; perhaps other demands on your time did not allow you to exercise as much deep thinking as you would have liked to do. Perhaps you did not see much value in the discussion – a very valuable final post would be a brief statement of why you found it so. Do not be shy about critiquing the exercise. Look at “A Poorly Crafted Assignment” in section 11.1 of the text in which the authors critique a similar assignment.
Writing Requirements
Minimum of 2 sources cited (assigned readings/online lessons and an outside source)
APA format for in-text citations and list of references
Grading
How does it relate to other concepts in the text?
*Initial Discussion Topic: Motor Control and the Brain *Directions: Respond to peer’s post. Address topic, cite source if sources used, in APA 7th Edition format, minimum 125 words for each section. *Research section: 125 words min. Responses must add new information not previously discussed. Consider new factual information tied with critical thinking. Share interesting and current research on the topic. *Critical Thinking Section: 125 words min. This section is only for your thoughts/conclusions. This is not research based. Pose new possibilities or opinions not previously voiced. Connect the dots. Why is this an important topic for you, your community, society, or the world? How does it relate to other concepts in the text?
Describe the enduring persistent characteristics (traits) of this person that make up his/her personality.
paper in which you will analyze the personality of a well-known person through two of the perspectives/domains of knowledge discussed in this course (the perspectives/ Domains of Knowledge you will chose from are clearly identified in the ‘topic’ column of the schedule on your syllabus). You will identify and describe enduring persistent characteristics of this person and then use the 2 perspectives/Domains of Knowledge to analyze their behaviors.
First, you need to choose a well-known person to analyze. Your analysis paper can only be as stimulating as your subject. Look for an interesting, complicated, multi-dimensional person who has lived long enough to do some out-of-the ordinary things in their lifetime (the guidelines for who you can specifically choose to write about are listed below).
When writing your paper, you will ORGANIZE your paper into FOUR sections:
1) Provide a brief History/Biography of this person. You will have to do some true investigation to get this information because you may not just use ‘popular beliefs’ about this person. Present this information in a chronological fashion (starting with what happened first, then continue to the latest). Only list the important issues that you feel influenced ‘who’ this person came to be. Remember to be clear and brief (do your best to summarize well)…you only have 4-6 pages to do your full analysis. This is not the ‘meat’ of your paper.
2) Describe the enduring persistent characteristics (traits) of this person that make up his/her personality. Discuss in detail the personal characteristics and behaviors that depict these personality characteristics. What characteristics are consistently demonstrated through his/her biographical information? It may help to narrow your description to a specific aspect of his/her personality or how this person acts in a few specific situations. This part of your paper should be a strictly descriptive, without any interpretation. That is, describe what this person does, says or feels, not why that is. Don’t simply restate biographical information. Focus the number of enduring characteristics to a small, manageable number, so that you can analyze them well in the next section.
Be specific about which traits/characteristics of this person you will be explaining in the next section. Bold these traits when you write about them. Use your course notes to ‘name’ the traits or characteristics in terms that you can explain in-depth in the next section (and remember to bold them).
3) Analyze this person’s interesting characteristics (traits) and behaviors from two perspectives/domains of knowledge covered in this course.—Important section!
Go back over the description in the second part and now provide an explanation for each of the enduring characteristics (traits) from the two domains/perspectives you are choosing. Use two different domains of knowledge and perspectives discussed in this course to analyze why you believe the person behaves the way s/he does or has the personality characteristics that s/he does. Can you make connections between your subject’s past and present? Why does s/he do what s/he does? Discuss any aspect of the domains of knowledge/perspectives that you feel is relevant. Briefly define the terms/concepts you will reference from the course. Only psychological terms from the course are fair game to be the basis of your analysis (don’t go to outside sources and pull in obscure terms). You should look ahead to future chapters that you haven’t covered yet. If you would like to include a concept/term from outside the course, you just need to email me in advance and we will discuss it.
This section is your chance to analyze why someone behaves the way the way they do, and base your analysis on theory. You will be addressing the question, “Why is this person like this, according to this theory?” You will not give your opinion here based on your personal history or ideas. You will base this analysis on theory found in the two perspectives/domains of knowledge you choose. When discussing various concepts and topics from the two perspectives/domains you choose, make sure you briefly define the concepts first, then explain how they are related to or explain the enduring traits/behavior of your identified person.
Here are a couple rules when choosing which perspectives/domains you will explore:
– You may not choose the Dispositional Domain (students tend to be too narrow in their discussion if using this domain). You may use terms from this Domain to ‘name’ the enduring traits in section #2, but you cannot use this domain to analyze the enduring traits.
– You must choose the Intrapsychic Domain as one of the perspectives through which to analyze the personality development of this interesting person. You can discuss any aspect of this domain, from Freud’s information to more current ideas of personality development.
So, you will then choose one additional domain/perspective through which to analyze this person’s personality. Remember—if you choose a Domain you have not covered yet in class, review the outline, PowerPoints, and lecture for details.
[Note: make sure to follow these two rules for choosing a domain of knowledge/perspective to analyze the personality of your famous person—your grade will suffer if you do not follow these rules. Ask if you have any questions.]
Remember to be clear and use your two domains of knowledge to explain each of the enduring characteristics from the previous section. Explain ‘why’ the person you chose has those traits in this analysis section, using theories. This is a very important section of your paper!
4) Summarize and present your Opinion about how well the domains of knowledge or perspectives explained the personality of the person you chose. State your opinions and the reasons behind them. This is your opportunity to have a personal voice. To get full credit for this section, you must be sure to provide the reasons for what you think so that the reader can understand your thinking. Also, include in this section any unanswered questions you might still have about how this person became who they became. Are there inconsistencies in their personality that you were unable to explain through the domains/perspectives you choose, even after reviewing your notes? What still has you thinking about this person? What unanswered questions have you been thinking about? Is there anything you did not get a chance to address in this paper due to length constraints?
