Is the critical value SMALLER or LARGER than the obtained value from your SPSS output?
Homework: Cumulative SPSS Assignment Instructions
Overview
This worksheet is designed to assess your ability to evaluate research designs, determine the most appropriate research design, conduct statistical tests using SPSS software, and present research conslusions (including appropriately formatted figures) using professional conventions. Such skills are fundamental to critically consuming, evaluating and producing research.
Instructions
Be sure you have reviewed this module’s assigned readings and presentations before completing this assignment. This assignment is worth 90 points. Each question is worth 5 content points except #12, which is worth 6 pts. Nine (9) points are assigned to general formatting. This includes using ensuring the homework is completed and submitted according to the instructions, SPSS output and images are legible and relevant, and that basic college level writing skills (e.g., grammar, sentence structure) are used in the results write-ups. Answers should be placed where indicated (e.g., “ANSWER”). Note: all questions must be attempted to be eligible for full credit of “format” points.
| Background information on the M7 Cumulative SPSS Data |
| Download the M7 Cumulative SPSS Data file associated with this worksheet. It has coded data that you will use to design, conduct, and interpret to demonstrate mastery of research methods and. It is updated regularly, so make sure you download the current file linked this specific term. Here is a description for each variable: Variable names and descriptions Gender 0 = male; 1 = female Events number of stressful life events that had occurred in the last year SATISFACTION average Likert-based (1-5) response to survey assessing workplace satisfaction (higher indicates higher satisfaction) Error1 this number represents identification of OSHA hazards before completing the annual OSHA training (higher # = identification of more errors) Error2 this number represents identification of OSHA hazards after completing the annual OSHA training (higher # = identification of more errors) Employee employee type (1 = sales; 2 = warehouse; 3 = management) Skills1 skills assessment taken within the first week on the job (higher = better skills) Skills2 skills assessment completed after 6 months on the job (higher = better skills) Skills3 skills assessment completed after 1 year of service (higher = better skills) Salary1 salary at time of hire Salary2 current salary Years number of years employed Personality Personality type (1 = Type “A” or 2 = Type “B”) |
| Cumulative Scenario 1 (30 pts) |
| Using the dataset provided, determine two variables that would be appropriate to assess using a two-group design to assess a “difference”. It can be between-subjects (BS) or within-subjects (WS) design. Use your selections to answer the following questions. |
| Decide on the two variables. List them using the names exactly as named within the SPSS file. For each, identify the variable type (independent or dependent). For the independent variable, indicate whether it is BS or WS. For the dependent variable, indicate its scale of measurement (nominal, ordinal, or scale). |
| ANSWER |
| State the null and research hypotheses based on the variables you selected, labeling one as the “null” and one as “research”. Explain why you used a one- or two-tailed hypothesis, noting the grade on that portion is solely based on the consistency of your justification with your choice of tail type. |
| ANSWER |
| Paste all relevant statistical output in the space provided below: |
| ANSWER |
| Use the degrees of freedom from your SPSS output or if necessary, hand-calculate them using the formulas in your e-book. Using the Appendix in your e-book to find the critical value, and list it here (do NOT round – include all decimal places). Also label and state your obtained value from your SPSS output. Is the critical value SMALLER or LARGER than the obtained value from your SPSS output? Does this mean you REJECT or FAIL TO REJECT the null hypothesis? Does this mean the results are “significant” or “non-significant”? |
| ANSWER |
| Create an appropriate graph in SPSS and format it using professional conventions. Present it as Figure 1 in the space below. Make sure you include the figure label (Figure 1), and create a Figure Title – all of this must be in proper format (including spacing and font style). |
| ANSWER |
| Present the results using APA format. This includes a full write-up to include a complete statistical notation as shown in the weekly presentations. Make sure to describe what the conclusions mean in general terms. You must include a call-out to Figure 1. Examples of APA results sections are also available in the “Helpful Hints” document. |
| ANSWER |
| Cumulative Scenario 2 (31 pts) |
| Using the dataset provided, select one variable that is within subjects (can be two or three levels) and one that is scale that will serve as your dependent variable. You cannot use a scenario from a previous answer (you can re-use one of the variables, but not both). Use your selections to answer the following questions. |
| Decide on the two variables. List them using the names exactly as named within the SPSS file. State the null and research hypotheses based on the variables you selected, labeling one as the “null” and one as “research”. |
| ANSWER |
| Paste all relevant statistical output in the space provided below: |
| ANSWER |
| Use the degrees of freedom from your SPSS output or if necessary, hand-calculate them using the formulas in your e-book. Using the Appendix in your e-book to find the critical value, and list it here (do NOT round – include all decimal places). Also label and state your obtained value from your SPSS output. Is the critical value SMALLER or LARGER than the obtained value from your SPSS output? Does this mean you REJECT or FAIL TO REJECT the null hypothesis? Does this mean the results are “significant” or “non-significant”? |
| ANSWER |
| Create an appropriate graph in SPSS and format it using professional conventions. Present it as Figure 2 in the space below. Make sure you include the figure label (Figure 2), and create a Figure Title – all of this must be in proper format (including spacing and font style). |
| ANSWER |
| Present the results using APA format. This includes a full write-up to include a complete statistical notation as shown in the weekly presentations. Make sure to describe what the conclusions mean in general terms. You must include a call-out to Figure 2. Examples of APA results sections are also available in the “Helpful Hints” document. |
| ANSWER |
| Discuss one concern you could imagine regarding internal validity, and one concern regarding external validity as they specifically relate to the scenario you created for this section. (HINT: You can look up the definitions of “internal validity” and “external validity” in your ebook glossery as a reminder – but then must apply those definitions to envision your own concerns related to them!) The points are solely on whether the justifications are consistent with the definitions and are realistic given the general nature of the scenario you selected (3 pts each = 6 pts total) |
| ANSWER |
| Cumulative Scenario 3 (30 pts) |
| Using the dataset provided, select two variables you would like to examine regarding a “relationship”. Use your selections to answer the following questions. |
| Decide on the two variables. List them using the names exactly as named within the SPSS file. Indicate the scale of measurement for each variable (nominal, ordinal, or scale). State the null and research hypotheses based on the variables you selected, labeling one as the “null” and one as “research”. Explain why you used a one- or two-tailed hypothesis, noting the grade on that portion is solely based on your justification. |
| ANSWER |
| Use the degrees of freedom from your SPSS output or if necessary, hand-calculate them using the formulas in your e-book. Using the Appendix in your e-book to find the critical value, and list it here (do NOT round – include all decimal places). Also label and state your obtained value from your SPSS output. Is the critical value SMALLER or LARGER than the obtained value from your SPSS output? Does this mean you REJECT or FAIL TO REJECT the null hypothesis? Does this mean the results are “significant” or “non-significant”? |
| ANSWER |
| Paste all relevant statistical output in the space provided below: |
| ANSWER |
| Create an appropriate graph in SPSS and format it using professional conventions. Present it as Figure 3 in the space below. Make sure you include the figure label (Figure 3), and create a Figure Title – all of this must be in proper format (including spacing and font style). |
| ANSWER |
| Present the results using APA format. This includes a full write-up to include a complete statistical notation as shown in the weekly presentations. Make sure to describe what the conclusions mean in general terms. You must include a call-out to Figure 3. Examples of APA results sections are also available in the “Helpful Hints” document. |
| ANSWER |
| Describe one potentially confounding variable in this scenario. Why do you think it may confound interpretations of the data? |
| ANSWER |
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
analyze in detail the basic tenets of the functionalist perspective, and compare this to at least one other perspective in sociology
concerning Durkheim and Merton, please address the following: 1) analyze in detail the basic tenets of the functionalist perspective, and compare this to at least one other perspective in sociology; 2) although Durkheim and Merton did not write during the same era in sociology, explain where their ideas are similar, and both contribute to a functionalist understanding of society; and 3) utilizing and citing one recent case in the media through television or radio broadcast, newspaper, and so forth, provide one key example of a social issue that shows how the functionalist perspective can be used to make society better.
Is there a difference between how your parents were socialized and how you were socialized?
1. Explain habitualization and how it relates to the social construction of reality. Make sure that you use an example from society.
2. Draw a large circle, and then “slice” the circle into pieces like a pie, labeling each piece with a role or status that you occupy. Add as many statuses, ascribed and achieved, that you have. Don’t forget things like dog owner, gardener, traveler, student, runner, and employee. How many statuses do you have? In which ones are there role conflicts?
3. Discuss socialization over the life course. Is there a difference between how your parents were socialized and how you were socialized? Make sure you discuss at least one aspect of your socialization.
4. How has technology changed your primary groups and secondary groups? Do you have more (and separate) primary groups due to online connectivity? Do you believe that someone, like Levy (discussed in Chapter 6), can have a true primary group made up of people she has never met? Why, or why not?
After researching these areas, did you find any careers that interested you? Why or why not?
Question 1
List at least four careers for each of these areas of psychology.
After researching these areas, did you find any careers that interested you? Why or why not?
What did you find to be the most interesting aspect about of these subspecialties in psychology?
Question 2
Nature (Biology) versus Nurture (Environment) Debate
Watch the brief interview of Dr. Laurence Steinberg about nature’s versus nurture’s impact on human development.
In this video with accompanying transcript, Dr. Laurence Steinberg, Professor of Psychology at Temple University, explains the latest research findings into the nature versus nurture debate, highlighting the need to break down the false dichotomy between genes and the environment.
Select a current issue within your workplace, social organization, or home, and briefly describe a workable research design to help solve that problem.
Select a current issue within your workplace, social organization, or home, and briefly describe a workable research design to help solve that problem.
Your journal entry must be at least 250 words in length. No references or citations are necessary.
How would you use the “Essentials of Nurse Manager Orientation”?
AONL
Explore the American Organization for Nursing Leadership (AONL)
Evaluate AONL “Education” activities.
Include the following aspects in the assignment:
- Reflect on the value of leadership certifications to your career management plans
- How would you use the “Essentials of Nurse Manager Orientation”?
- As a leader, how will you promote continuing education in your nursing employees?
- Share what surprised you in the “Education” tab
- This is an informal reflection of 1-2 pages, but as always, proper sentence structure, grammar, and spelling is required.
- Cite the AONL and any other references you may have used
Discuss how you as a leader will protect your organization from outside threats
Infrastructure Review
As a nurse executive leader, you may very well be tasked with the evaluation of the current technology safeguards, infrastructure, and regulations surrounding the security of the enormous amount of patient data collected in your organization. As nursing continues to increase point-of-care clinical technology, there is potential to increase vulnerabilities and risks with protected health information.
There are a variety of tools to assist with these evaluations.( HealthIT.gov has downloadable programs for a Security Risk Assessment Tool.)
Choose one of the Word documents, and do not choose the same one as your peers if possible.
Analyze the Administrative, Technical, or Physical Safeguards using the corresponding SRA tool.
Include the following aspects in the discussion:
- Complete a review of your own organization’s infrastructure using the chosen tool. If you are not working, choose an organization for which you once worked (the chosen tool does not need to be submitted).
- Seek assistance when needed from appropriate departments within your own healthcare institution
- Summarize what you discovered during the review
- How did the tool assist in your assessment?
- Discuss one vulnerability that you have discovered
- Discuss how you as a leader will protect your organization from outside threats
NOTE- JUST WRITE 100 WORDS.
What would you say are the strengths and weaknesses of the study with a focus on its methodology?
Go online and select an open access article such as in the Journal of Business Research, the Westcliff International Journal of Applied Research, Springer Business Research Journal, MDPI, and BRQ Business Research Quarterly and select an article published within the past two years. Select an article of interest to you and that employs one of the research techniques we have discussed/will discuss in class: surveys, experiments, content analysis, in-depth interviews, focus groups, case studies, or participant observation. Copy the article so that you can turn it in with your critique. Your critique should contain the following elements:
- Provide a complete citation of the article (title, authors, journal, volume, year, and pages).
- What are the research questions/hypotheses?
- What are the major theories that it examines (be sure to briefly explain the theory)?
- What is the research methodology (sample size, independent variables, dependent variables, and how were they measured)?
- Summarize the major results.
- What does the author say is the major contribution of the study?
- What would you say are the strengths and weaknesses of the study with a focus on its methodology?
Explain the patient outcome(s) or patient-care efficiencies this project is aimed at improving and explain how this improvement would occur.
This is the first paper that is due for this class. Your focus for this paper is to write a proposal for a nursing informatic project for your organization. There are couple of things I want to stress for this paper.
1. Write the paper in third person.
2. It must be a nursing informatics project. If you are unsure of your topic, email me.
3. Cite throughout the paper.
4. Make sure to include all required areas (review rubric before and after you complete the paper).
5. You must have an introduction and conclusion.
6. You must have references. The number of references determines the maximum points you can achieve.
7. Use APA formatting with level headings. All master level papers MUST have level headings.
8. The 4–5-page requirement does not include the title and reference page.
The Assignment: (4-5 pages)
In a 4- to 5-page project proposal written to the leadership of your healthcare organization, propose a nursing informatics project for your organization that you advocate to improve patient outcomes or patient-care efficiency. Your project proposal should include the following:
- Describe the project you propose.
- Identify the stakeholders impacted by this project.
- Explain the patient outcome(s) or patient-care efficiencies this project is aimed at improving and explain how this improvement would occur. Be specific and provide examples.
- Identify the technologies required to implement this project and explain why.
- Identify the project team (by roles) and explain how you would incorporate the nurse informaticist in the project team.
- Use APA format and include a title page and reference page.
- Use the Safe Assign Drafts to check your match percentage before submitting your work.
***MUST HAVE EXCEPTIONAL APA FORMAT. Grammar and APA format where its needed its a must for achieving a passing grade. Even on references italicize when required by APA.
write a detailed summary on Dynamic Pricing and Bias.
After reading the article, How targeted ads and dynamic pricing can perpetuate bias, in the Module 5: Lecture Materials & Resources, write a detailed summary on Dynamic Pricing and Bias.
Submission Instructions:
- The paper is to be clear and concise and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation, and misspelling.
- The paper is to be 300 words in length, current APA style, excluding the title, abstract and references page.
- Incorporate a minimum of 2 current references (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work.
- https://hbr.org/2019/11/how-targeted-ads-and-dynamic-pricing-can-perpetuate-bias?referral=03759&cm_vc=rr_item_page.bottom