ENG 102 WNC Horror Movies Project

Using a variety of academic articles, popular culture or media sources, and films, you will support an original thesis. Over the course of the second half of the semester, you will develop your own research question that incorporates the themes of the class (horror, film, social issues, and how society is reflected in media) and research your chosen topic. After your research you will craft a thesis that is the response to your research question. For example, if your question is Do horror films make us numb to real world violence? your thesis might be something like this while many people watch horror and do not become violent or numb to violence, there are many cases in which films have inspired real world violence. Your thesis should be supported by your research. For this essay you need the following sources:Assignment Components:Format:Standard MLA 19th editionPage Requirement:12-15 pagesAnnotated Bibliography Assignment:For each source you find during your research you will do an annotated entry for on your works cited page. You will turn your works cited page in two weeks prior to the final date of class. The entries will all be combined, and follow proper MLA format (alphabetical). Each entry will start with the citation, the be followed by two distinct paragraphs: a paragraph of summary, and a paragraph of how you intend to use the material. All entries need all 3 of these elements (citation, summary, intended use).Format:Standard MLA 19th editionPage Requirements:Each individual entry should be between ½ page to a full page. You should have a minimum of 9 sources. If you have more than 10 sources, omit entries for the films, and focus on the academic sources first. The overall product should be between 9-12 pages.Presentation Assignment:Each student will present their final research for consideration to the class. The presentation should begin with their research question: how did they decide what to research? What did the research process look like? The presentation should highlight the most important sources found, and should feature brief analysis of a film that someone would find if they read the finished essay. The presentation should demonstrate scope of the essay, and a deeper understanding of the material than a layperson. A visual component is required (video, poster, handout, PowerPoint, etc). At the end of the presentation, students will have the opportunity to ask questions.Format:In person presentation. Business casual attire preferred.

ACCTG 334 SDSU Prepare a Statement of Cash Flows Using Indirect Method Questions

I’m working on a accounting discussion question and need the explanation and answer to help me learn. Azteca Corp Co. is a manufacturer and distributer of precision navigation and guidance equipment. The following is information about the company’s earnings and securities on 31 December 2024.(Note: round all per share values to three decimal places)Earnings and SharesNet income1,500,000Average market price of common stock30Tax rate22%Number of common shares outstanding ($1 par) at 1-Jan-2024300,000Number of 3% non-cumulative preferred shares outstanding ($50 par) at year-end55,000Each share of preferred shares is convertible into 2 shares of common stockTotal Dividends Paid during 2024166,500Additional Information on Stock TransactionsOn April 1, 2024, Azteca Corp repurchased 27 thousand previously issued shares.On September 1, Azteca Corp sold and issued an additional 17.5 thousand shares of common stock at $30.Shares Issuable perBondsFace/Carrying ValueInt Rate$1,000 BondSeries A Convertible750,0005%10Series B Convertible650,0004%10Options and WarrantsOptionsWarrantsNumber of shares issuable15,00012,000Exercise price3226During the December 31, 2023 Financial Statement Audit, the company conducted a thorough internal audit, during which the following facts were discovered. The audit occurred before any adjusting entries or closing entries are prepared. (Assume the 2022 books are closed)1.The Company purchased a machine for $250,000 on January 1, 2020. Lundholm depreciates machines of this type by the straight-line method over a 8-year period using no salvage value. Due to a change in sales patterns, on January 1, 2023, management determines the useful life of the machine to be a total of 10 years, and has a salvage value of $10,000. What amount should Lundholm record for depreciation expense for 2023?2.The Company purchased machinery on July 1, 2023. The machinery was valued at $3,000,000, with a $250,000 down and the Company agreed to pay the balance in 6 equal installments ($541,798), payable each June 30. The company has a borrowing rate of 5%. There is no salvage value, and the useful life is 10 years.The following journal entries were recorded:1-Jul-23DRPPE – Machinery$3,000,000CRNote Payable$3,000,000DRRepairs and maintenance$250,000CRCash$250,0003.Two years earlier, The Company recorded a 6% stock dividend (4,000 common shares, $1 par) as follows:DRRetained earnings$4,000CRCommon stock$4,000The shares had a market price at the time of $16 per share.4.A 10-year bonds were issued on September 1, 2022. The face value of the bonds totaled $120,000 with a stated rate of 9%. The market rate was 7% when the bonds were issued. Interest is paid annually on August 30 of each year. The following journal entry was recorded when the bonds were issued, and the interest paid:9/1/2022Bond IssuanceDRCash$136,857CRGain on Bonds Payable$16,857CRBonds Payable$120,0009/1/2023DRInterest Expense$10,800CRCash$10,8003. PQR IndustriesComparative Balance Sheets December 31, 2024 and 202320242023Assets:Cash $ 2,433,000 $ 1,310,000Accounts receivable 2,084,229 1,350,000Inventory 2,700,000 1,575,000Land 1,675,000 1,800,000Building 2,700,000 2,700,000 Less: Accumulated depreciation (900,000) (810,000)Equipment 8,550,000 6,750,000 Less: Accumulated depreciation (1,575,000) (1,440,000)Patent 3,600,000 4,500,000 $ 21,267,229 $ 17,735,000Liabilities:Accounts payable $ 1,900,000 $ 1,350,000Accrued expenses payable 900,000 675,000Interest Payable 3,000 – Dividends Payable 25,000 35,000Notes Payable 125,000 150,000Bond Payable (net) 261,073 – Shareholders’ Equity:Common stock 9,456,667 9,000,000Paid-in capital–excess of par 2,253,333 2,025,000Retained earnings 6,343,156 4,500,000 $ 21,267,229 $ 17,735,000Additional information from the accounting records:a. During 2024, equipment with a cost of $875,000 (45% depreciated) was sold for $350,000.b. The Statement of Shareholders’ Equity reveals reductions of $685,000 and $445,000 for stock dividends and cash dividends, respectively.c. Net income for the year was $2,973,156.d. Land was sold for $90,000.e. On May 1, 2024, the company issued 10 year, $300,000.00, 6% bonds at a market rate of 8%. The issuing price of the bond was $259,229.02. Interest on the bonds is paid semi-annually on Oct 31 and April 30 of each year.Using this financial statement data, prepare a complete statement of cash flows, using the INDIRECT method.

SEU Cognitive Ability Discussion

Week6Which component of ethical decision-making do you believe best explains student cheating: moral awareness, moral judgment, or moral intent? Why do you feel that way?Week 77.2 Action Required: (Knowledge Application)Cognitive ability refers to capabilities related to acquiring and applying knowledge in problem solving. Types of cognitive ability include verbal, quantitative, reasoning, spatial, and perceptual. Research indicates that genes and the environment play equal roles in how we acquire these abilities. Consider the facets of cognitive ability and cognitive employment testing in your future career: how important will they be?Case Analysis (Sorry, You’re Too Smart)Have you ever been turned down for a job because you were “overqualified”?Although this may sound like a compliment, it can be disappointing when you are job hunting. Consider applicants who are turned down for jobs because they are “too smart.” This could be determined by pre-employment testing or the interviewer may assume applicants’ cognitive ability based on education level, GPA, or certifications. You don’t often hear someone say that an applicant is “too emotionally intelligent” or “too physically coordinated.” So why does it matter if you are overqualified in cognitive ability?Employers may argue that cognitively overqualified employees will not perform well in their jobs. The lack of challenge they feel in the job tasks could make them bored and unmotivated and then lead to low performance. In fact, research shows that cognitively overqualified employees perform just as well as other employees, but not necessarily better. If the employees are in leadership positions and are cognitively overqualified, they perform better than other leaders. So if someone tries to tell you that you won’t perform well if you are cognitively overqualified, that’s not a fact.Employers may also argue that employees who are cognitively overqualified for their jobs will have higher job dissatisfaction. Specifically, they may be dissatisfied with the wages, challenges, and potential for career advancement. In short, these employees see the gap between their current and potential situations and that makes them unhappy at work.We all don’t have intelligence tests when we are employed, so what about when you perceive you are overqualified in your cognitive skills, but don’t have actual test scores to support your assumption? Employees who perceive they are cognitively overqualified tend to actually be correct. They also tend to have higher levels of openness to experience personality trait from the Big Five model.7.3 Test your knowledge:(Questions)1. An interviewer who assumes you have a certain average cognitive ability level because she knows your level of education would be correct according to what test?2. According to the case, what might a company do to raise job satisfaction and retain employees who are cognitively overqualified?

ACCT 405 Accounting Worksheet

Q1) Fair Value Accounting is argued to be conceptually and practically preferable to Amortized Cost Accounting for most financial instruments. But there are some arguments that are against fair value accounting. Understanding these arguments are important because they speak directly to the strength and weakness of fair value accounting. You are required to discuss these arguments in detail. Q2) Mortgage banks are exposed to interest rate risk on their mortgage-related asset through prepayment and discounting effects that are not entirely distinct. Discuss the Prepayment and Discounting Effects of Mortgage Banks in detail.Q.3) Accounting for Securitization under SFAS No. 140 (2000) is a limited attempt to describe complex transactions that are structured to yield desired economic and accounting outcomes. This accounting raises three issues for users of financial reports. State these three issues.

AMH 2023 Daytona State College American History Discussion

Please only use the link that I provided Americans are very proud of their freedoms; the fact that we are a democratic nation and are free to do as we please. However, does the Constitution and the courts allow Americans to do anything or is it anything within reason? What does that mean? Have Americans been able to be completely free in their actions or has the courts been used to grant Americans more equality in their actions? Review the following articles and discuss the concept.

University of Phoenix Standard for Determining Psychopathology Paper

Exam ContentWhile the DSM-5?is considered a reputable standard for determining psychopathology, it has been criticized by some professionals in the behavioral health?fields.?As you study psychopathology, it is important for you to understand the varied viewpoints regarding this diagnostic tool and to be able to critique and evaluate its relevance.?In this assignment, you will demonstrate your ability to critique the role of the DSM in determining psychopathology.Assume you are an intern at a?psychologist’s?office. You are questioning the use of the DSM for diagnosing clients. Your supervisor has asked you to write a critique of the DSM in reference to the diagnosis of PTSD, which she?asks you to?present in?your?next supervision meeting.Write?a?700- to?1,050-word?executive summary of your critique of the DSM’s diagnostic?accuracy?and cultural sensitivity in diagnosing PTSD.Include?each of the following?in?your summary:Critique the diagnostic?accuracy?and cultural sensitivity of the DSM-5 diagnosis of PTSD.Include an analysis of the strengths and opportunities for how PTSD is characterized in the DSM-5.Evaluate?the strengths and weaknesses?of other?available?diagnostic?systems,?including their evaluation technique?for PTSD.Review the DSM-5 for?other diagnoses that contain the DSM-5 criteria for PTSD.?Describe any you find.

Should Government Be Run Like a Business Discussion

1. Should Government be run like a business? Why or Why not?2. Next, provide a brief overview of the Politics/Administration Dichotomy. In your writing, be sure to think through and discuss the challenges of effectively implementing public policy when we operate in the midst of a politically charged, organizationally fragmented system. (Estimated 6 paragraphs)3. Application: Consider the following case, where you are an administrative assistant in the Department of Finance for a midsize suburban community. You are asked to contract with an accounting firm to audit the books of the ten major city departments, and some unforeseen relationships and connections arise.A) What do you say to the mayor?B) What do you recommend be done about the contract?C) What does this case say about the relationship between business and government?

Create a chart that compares and contrasts the qualities that best identifies each of these generations of employees.

The healthcare environment currently contains four generations working side-by-side (Millennials, Generation X, Baby Boomers, and the traditionalists). Create a chart that compares and contrasts the qualities that best identifies each of these generations of employees. Then write in 1 page, describe how you as a leader will need to adapt your leadership style to meet the needs of these generations.
Assignment must be APA formatted and include a minimum of two peer-reviewed articles.

Macqueen assessment 6 | Psychology homework help

OVERVIEW
 
Write a 5–7-page assessment in which you examine the controversy related to research and ethics in the field of social psychology.
It is essential to be able to critically analyze the research methods used in studies, in order to weigh the validity of the conclusions or recommendations.
SHOW LESS
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:
•   Competency 1: Apply information literacy and research skills to locate scholarly information in the field of social psychology.
•                     Use valid, scholarly research resources relevant to the field of social psychology.
•   Competency 4: Examine the research methods frequently used in the study of social psychology.
•                     Describe the impact of controversial research studies on the human participants.
•   Competency 5: Examine controversial research studies in social psychology from an ethical standpoint.
•                     Explain how controversial research studies contributed to the development of ethical standards in the field of psychology.
•                     Develop evidence-based arguments for and against controversial research studies in the field of social psychology.
•                     Describe what controversial research studies revealed about conformity and obedience to authority.
•   Competency 6: Apply critical thinking skills to resolve conflicts and issues in the field of social psychology.
•                     Determine whether knowledge gained justifies controversial research studies in the field of social psychology.
•   Competency 7: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for professionals in the field of psychology.
•                     Write coherently to support a central idea with correct grammar, usage, and mechanics as expected of a psychology professional.
Use APA format and style.
 
CONTEXT
Is conformity good or bad? Are people willing to hurt one another just because an authority told them to? Some of the most fascinating research results about human behavior were intending to answer these very questions. The results on the topics of social conformity and obedience to authority revealed some disturbing revelations about human behavior and about potential harm to participants in research. The studies and their results had tremendous implications for the field on how we conduct research—and on how we understand the influence of social pressure and leadership. Because of the significant implications in both research and application, these studies have been some of the most controversial and hotly debated topics in psychology.
 
QUESTIONS TO CONSIDER
 
To deepen your understanding, you are encouraged to consider the questions below and discuss them with a fellow learner, a work associate, an interested friend, or a member of the business community.
•   Is deception always necessary when conducting research in social psychology with human participants?
Do the insights gained from research justify deceiving people?
 
RESOURCES
Suggested Resources
The following optional resources are provided to support you in completing the assessment or to provide a helpful context. For additional resources, refer to the Research Resources and Supplemental Resources in the left navigation menu of your courseroom.
Library Resources
The following e-books or articles from the Capella University Library are linked directly in this course. Note: Some of the articles listed are fairly old and are included here because they are considered seminal works in the field.
•   Bandura, A., Ross, D., Ross, S. A. (1961). Transmission of aggression through imitation of aggressive models. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63(3), 575–582.
•   Bandura, A., Ross, D., Ross, S. A. (1963). Imitation of film-mediated aggressive models. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66(1), 3–11.
•   Becker-Blease, K. A., Freyd, J. J. (2006). Research participants telling the truth about their lives: The ethics of asking and not asking about abuse. American Psychologist, 61(3), 218–226.
•   Benham, B. (2008). The ubiquity of deception and the ethics of deceptive research. Bioethics, 22(3), 147–156.
•   Boynton, M. H., Portnoy, D. B., Johnson, B. T. (2013). Exploring the ethics and psychological impact of deception in psychological research. IRB: Ethics Human Research, 35(2), 7–13.Crano, W. D. (2000). Milestones in the psychological analysis of social influence. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 4(1), 68–80.
•   Buckle, J. L., Dwyer, S. C., Jackson, M. (2010). Qualitative bereavement research: Incongruity between the perspectives of participants and research ethics boards. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 13(2), 111–125.
•   Guadagno, R. E., Muscanell, N. L., Rice, L. M., Roberts, N. (2013). Social influence online: The impact of social validation and likability on compliance. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 2(1), 51–60.
•   Haney, C., Zimbardo, P. (1998). The past and future of U.S. prison policy: Twenty-five years after the Stanford Prison Experiment. American Psychologist, 53(7), 709–727.
•   Heerdink, M. W., van Kleef, G. A., Homan, A. C., Fischer, A. H. (2013). On the social influence of emotions in groups: Interpersonal effects of anger and happiness on conformity versus deviance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(2), 262–284.
•   Horcajo, J., Petty, R. E., Briñol, P. (2010). The effects of majority versus minority source status on persuasion: A self-validation analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(3), 498–512.
•   Juritzen, T. I., Grimen, H., Heggen, K. (2011). Protecting vulnerable research participants: A Foucault-inspired analysis of ethics committees. Nursing Ethics, 18(5), 640–650.
•   McDonald, K. E., Kidney, C. A., Patka, M. (2013). You need to let your voice be heard: Research participants views on research. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 57(3), 216–225.
•   Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(4), 371–378.
•   Milgram, S. (1964). Group pressure and action against a person. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 69(2), 137–143.
•   Milgram, S. (1965). Liberating effects of group pressure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1(2), 127–134.
•   Pascual-Leone, A., Singh, T., Scoboria, A. (2010). Using deception ethically: Practical research guidelines for researchers and reviewers. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 51(4), 241–248.
•   Zimbardo, P. G. (1974). On obedience to authority. American Psychologist, 29(7), 566–567.
•   Voisin, D., Fointiat, V. (2013). Reduction in cognitive dissonance according to normative standards in the induced compliance paradigm. Social Psychology, 44(3), 191–195.
•   Wilson, C. M., Christensen, B. K. (2012). Ethical issues relevant to the assessment of suicide risk in nonclinical research settings. Crisis, 33(1), 54–59.
 
 
ASSESSMENT INSTRUCTIONS
 
To prepare for this assessment, locate scholarly articles on Milgrams studies on obedience to authority and Zimbardos Stanford Prison experiment on the power of social roles. These two pivotal studies provide the basis for this assessment.
Examine the controversy related to research and ethics in the field of social psychology. Consider the information you located on Milgrams studies on obedience to authority and Zimbardos Stanford Prison experiment on the power of social roles. Include the following in your assessment:
•   Describe what these studies revealed about conformity and obedience to authority.
•   Explain the benefits from these research studies. What knowledge or insight was gained?
•   Describe the impact of the studies in terms of the effects on the human participants.
•   Explain how these (and other) controversial research studies have shaped the principles and standards in the current APA Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Ethics.
•   Develop evidence-based arguments both for and against these types of controversial research studies.
•   Do you think that the information that was obtained was worth the risks to the human subjects? Explain and support your position.
Your submitted assessment should be 5–7 pages in length, excluding title page and reference page, and use references from at least three scholarly resources. Be sure to follow APA guidelines for format and style.
Additional Requirements
•   Include a title page and reference page.
•   At least three current scholarly or professional resources.
•   APA format.
•   Times New Roman font, 12 point.
•   Double spaced.
 
 

hormone replacement therapy (hrt) | anatomy

 
Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT) is most commonly known for treating the discomfort associated with menopause. However, more broadly, HRT is any form of hormone therapy that involves a patient receiving hormones to supplement or replace naturally occurring hormones in the body. For this discussion post, research different forms of HRT and choose one type to focus on.
Initial post: In your original post, describe a patient who may benefit from HRT. Explain the risks and benefits to using HRT in the scenario you chose. Be sure to include information on safety.

× How can I help you?