Homework help | Foundations of professional nursing

Professional Development Plan
develop a strategic plan to aid your transition into the role of a professional nurse. , address each of the following criteria:

Discuss factors influencing your decision to obtain a BSN degree.
Discuss how the role of the baccalaureate differs from your current role.
Describe new opportunities that may be available after degree completion.
Examine one of the two models of socialization discussed in your readings and place yourself in one of the stages.

Provide your rationale for that placement.
If none of the models or stages fits your experience, create your own model (or stage).

Identify two professional short-term goals.
Identify two professional long-term goals.
Expound upon the challenges and barriers you face in pursuit of your short- and long-term goals.
Identify mentors and support systems that aid you in overcoming challenges and barriers necessary to achieve goals.

Create a chart that compares and contrasts the qualities that best identifies each of these generations of employees.

The healthcare environment currently contains four generations working side-by-side (Millennials, Generation X, Baby Boomers, and the traditionalists). Create a chart that compares and contrasts the qualities that best identifies each of these generations of employees. Then write in 1 page, describe how you as a leader will need to adapt your leadership style to meet the needs of these generations.
Assignment must be APA formatted and include a minimum of two peer-reviewed articles.

hormone replacement therapy (hrt) | anatomy

 
Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT) is most commonly known for treating the discomfort associated with menopause. However, more broadly, HRT is any form of hormone therapy that involves a patient receiving hormones to supplement or replace naturally occurring hormones in the body. For this discussion post, research different forms of HRT and choose one type to focus on.
Initial post: In your original post, describe a patient who may benefit from HRT. Explain the risks and benefits to using HRT in the scenario you chose. Be sure to include information on safety.

Overview in this module, you have learned about the benefits,

 
Overview
In this module, you have learned about the benefits, drawbacks, and overall value of using the triple bottom line (TBL) in business. In this assignment, you will take a closer look at how strategies for incorporating this framework are similar and different across the manufacturing industry and the service industry.
Prompt
Imagine you are a sustainability consultant, and you’ve been asked to create a simple handout that clarifies the similarities and differences between strategies used to incorporate the TBL into the manufacturing industry and the service industry. The handout will be provided to individuals at large and small group trainings.
Specifically, you must address the following rubric criteria:

Similarities: Explain the similarities that exist between incorporating the TBL framework into both the service industry and the manufacturing industry, and why.
Differences: Explain the differences that exist between incorporating the TBL framework into the service industry and the manufacturing industry, and why.
Example Strategies: Provide an example of a strategy that is appropriate to use across both the service and the manufacturing industries, and provide an example that is specific to either the service or the manufacturing industry when considering people, planet, or profit through the TBL framework. Include a brief explanation of what each example demonstrates.

Guidelines for Submission
Submit this assignment as a 350- to 500-word Word document. Use the course resource or external resources to support your comparisons. Sources should be cited according to APA style.

AMH 2023 Daytona State College American History Discussion

Please only use the link that I provided Americans are very proud of their freedoms; the fact that we are a democratic nation and are free to do as we please. However, does the Constitution and the courts allow Americans to do anything or is it anything within reason? What does that mean? Have Americans been able to be completely free in their actions or has the courts been used to grant Americans more equality in their actions? Review the following articles and discuss the concept.

Objective: create a c++ console

 Objective: Create a C++ console application that can analyze numeric data contained in an single-dimension array of type integer.  
Steps:  
Create a new Visual Studio project and source code file. Copy and paste the code below into a source code file. Add the following functions to your program: Sum – return a sum of all of the data in the array CountNmbrsBigger – return a count of the number of data elements in the array that are larger than a given integer Average – returns an average of the data in an array High – returns the highest value in the array Low –returns the lowest value in the array Find(number) – returns the first index of the location of the number in the array Test your class by creating a main function and an array with 10 numbers, invoking each function and displaying the results to the screen. Use the following prototype definition in the creation of your functions:
 

SEU Cognitive Ability Discussion

Week6Which component of ethical decision-making do you believe best explains student cheating: moral awareness, moral judgment, or moral intent? Why do you feel that way?Week 77.2 Action Required: (Knowledge Application)Cognitive ability refers to capabilities related to acquiring and applying knowledge in problem solving. Types of cognitive ability include verbal, quantitative, reasoning, spatial, and perceptual. Research indicates that genes and the environment play equal roles in how we acquire these abilities. Consider the facets of cognitive ability and cognitive employment testing in your future career: how important will they be?Case Analysis (Sorry, You’re Too Smart)Have you ever been turned down for a job because you were “overqualified”?Although this may sound like a compliment, it can be disappointing when you are job hunting. Consider applicants who are turned down for jobs because they are “too smart.” This could be determined by pre-employment testing or the interviewer may assume applicants’ cognitive ability based on education level, GPA, or certifications. You don’t often hear someone say that an applicant is “too emotionally intelligent” or “too physically coordinated.” So why does it matter if you are overqualified in cognitive ability?Employers may argue that cognitively overqualified employees will not perform well in their jobs. The lack of challenge they feel in the job tasks could make them bored and unmotivated and then lead to low performance. In fact, research shows that cognitively overqualified employees perform just as well as other employees, but not necessarily better. If the employees are in leadership positions and are cognitively overqualified, they perform better than other leaders. So if someone tries to tell you that you won’t perform well if you are cognitively overqualified, that’s not a fact.Employers may also argue that employees who are cognitively overqualified for their jobs will have higher job dissatisfaction. Specifically, they may be dissatisfied with the wages, challenges, and potential for career advancement. In short, these employees see the gap between their current and potential situations and that makes them unhappy at work.We all don’t have intelligence tests when we are employed, so what about when you perceive you are overqualified in your cognitive skills, but don’t have actual test scores to support your assumption? Employees who perceive they are cognitively overqualified tend to actually be correct. They also tend to have higher levels of openness to experience personality trait from the Big Five model.7.3 Test your knowledge:(Questions)1. An interviewer who assumes you have a certain average cognitive ability level because she knows your level of education would be correct according to what test?2. According to the case, what might a company do to raise job satisfaction and retain employees who are cognitively overqualified?

Macqueen assessment 6 | Psychology homework help

OVERVIEW
 
Write a 5–7-page assessment in which you examine the controversy related to research and ethics in the field of social psychology.
It is essential to be able to critically analyze the research methods used in studies, in order to weigh the validity of the conclusions or recommendations.
SHOW LESS
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:
•   Competency 1: Apply information literacy and research skills to locate scholarly information in the field of social psychology.
•                     Use valid, scholarly research resources relevant to the field of social psychology.
•   Competency 4: Examine the research methods frequently used in the study of social psychology.
•                     Describe the impact of controversial research studies on the human participants.
•   Competency 5: Examine controversial research studies in social psychology from an ethical standpoint.
•                     Explain how controversial research studies contributed to the development of ethical standards in the field of psychology.
•                     Develop evidence-based arguments for and against controversial research studies in the field of social psychology.
•                     Describe what controversial research studies revealed about conformity and obedience to authority.
•   Competency 6: Apply critical thinking skills to resolve conflicts and issues in the field of social psychology.
•                     Determine whether knowledge gained justifies controversial research studies in the field of social psychology.
•   Competency 7: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for professionals in the field of psychology.
•                     Write coherently to support a central idea with correct grammar, usage, and mechanics as expected of a psychology professional.
Use APA format and style.
 
CONTEXT
Is conformity good or bad? Are people willing to hurt one another just because an authority told them to? Some of the most fascinating research results about human behavior were intending to answer these very questions. The results on the topics of social conformity and obedience to authority revealed some disturbing revelations about human behavior and about potential harm to participants in research. The studies and their results had tremendous implications for the field on how we conduct research—and on how we understand the influence of social pressure and leadership. Because of the significant implications in both research and application, these studies have been some of the most controversial and hotly debated topics in psychology.
 
QUESTIONS TO CONSIDER
 
To deepen your understanding, you are encouraged to consider the questions below and discuss them with a fellow learner, a work associate, an interested friend, or a member of the business community.
•   Is deception always necessary when conducting research in social psychology with human participants?
Do the insights gained from research justify deceiving people?
 
RESOURCES
Suggested Resources
The following optional resources are provided to support you in completing the assessment or to provide a helpful context. For additional resources, refer to the Research Resources and Supplemental Resources in the left navigation menu of your courseroom.
Library Resources
The following e-books or articles from the Capella University Library are linked directly in this course. Note: Some of the articles listed are fairly old and are included here because they are considered seminal works in the field.
•   Bandura, A., Ross, D., Ross, S. A. (1961). Transmission of aggression through imitation of aggressive models. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63(3), 575–582.
•   Bandura, A., Ross, D., Ross, S. A. (1963). Imitation of film-mediated aggressive models. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66(1), 3–11.
•   Becker-Blease, K. A., Freyd, J. J. (2006). Research participants telling the truth about their lives: The ethics of asking and not asking about abuse. American Psychologist, 61(3), 218–226.
•   Benham, B. (2008). The ubiquity of deception and the ethics of deceptive research. Bioethics, 22(3), 147–156.
•   Boynton, M. H., Portnoy, D. B., Johnson, B. T. (2013). Exploring the ethics and psychological impact of deception in psychological research. IRB: Ethics Human Research, 35(2), 7–13.Crano, W. D. (2000). Milestones in the psychological analysis of social influence. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 4(1), 68–80.
•   Buckle, J. L., Dwyer, S. C., Jackson, M. (2010). Qualitative bereavement research: Incongruity between the perspectives of participants and research ethics boards. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 13(2), 111–125.
•   Guadagno, R. E., Muscanell, N. L., Rice, L. M., Roberts, N. (2013). Social influence online: The impact of social validation and likability on compliance. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 2(1), 51–60.
•   Haney, C., Zimbardo, P. (1998). The past and future of U.S. prison policy: Twenty-five years after the Stanford Prison Experiment. American Psychologist, 53(7), 709–727.
•   Heerdink, M. W., van Kleef, G. A., Homan, A. C., Fischer, A. H. (2013). On the social influence of emotions in groups: Interpersonal effects of anger and happiness on conformity versus deviance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(2), 262–284.
•   Horcajo, J., Petty, R. E., Briñol, P. (2010). The effects of majority versus minority source status on persuasion: A self-validation analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(3), 498–512.
•   Juritzen, T. I., Grimen, H., Heggen, K. (2011). Protecting vulnerable research participants: A Foucault-inspired analysis of ethics committees. Nursing Ethics, 18(5), 640–650.
•   McDonald, K. E., Kidney, C. A., Patka, M. (2013). You need to let your voice be heard: Research participants views on research. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 57(3), 216–225.
•   Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(4), 371–378.
•   Milgram, S. (1964). Group pressure and action against a person. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 69(2), 137–143.
•   Milgram, S. (1965). Liberating effects of group pressure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1(2), 127–134.
•   Pascual-Leone, A., Singh, T., Scoboria, A. (2010). Using deception ethically: Practical research guidelines for researchers and reviewers. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 51(4), 241–248.
•   Zimbardo, P. G. (1974). On obedience to authority. American Psychologist, 29(7), 566–567.
•   Voisin, D., Fointiat, V. (2013). Reduction in cognitive dissonance according to normative standards in the induced compliance paradigm. Social Psychology, 44(3), 191–195.
•   Wilson, C. M., Christensen, B. K. (2012). Ethical issues relevant to the assessment of suicide risk in nonclinical research settings. Crisis, 33(1), 54–59.
 
 
ASSESSMENT INSTRUCTIONS
 
To prepare for this assessment, locate scholarly articles on Milgrams studies on obedience to authority and Zimbardos Stanford Prison experiment on the power of social roles. These two pivotal studies provide the basis for this assessment.
Examine the controversy related to research and ethics in the field of social psychology. Consider the information you located on Milgrams studies on obedience to authority and Zimbardos Stanford Prison experiment on the power of social roles. Include the following in your assessment:
•   Describe what these studies revealed about conformity and obedience to authority.
•   Explain the benefits from these research studies. What knowledge or insight was gained?
•   Describe the impact of the studies in terms of the effects on the human participants.
•   Explain how these (and other) controversial research studies have shaped the principles and standards in the current APA Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Ethics.
•   Develop evidence-based arguments both for and against these types of controversial research studies.
•   Do you think that the information that was obtained was worth the risks to the human subjects? Explain and support your position.
Your submitted assessment should be 5–7 pages in length, excluding title page and reference page, and use references from at least three scholarly resources. Be sure to follow APA guidelines for format and style.
Additional Requirements
•   Include a title page and reference page.
•   At least three current scholarly or professional resources.
•   APA format.
•   Times New Roman font, 12 point.
•   Double spaced.
 
 

Case analysis #2 (bus6750 international business management)

  
          Case Analysis #2         

Due   Sunday by                  11:59pm  
Points 75 
Submitting a file upload 

Reread the Country Focus “Turkey, Its Religion, and Politics” in chapter 4 and address this question: 

Are the concerns of those opposing Turkey’s admittance to  the European Union well-founded? Can Islam, capitalism, and  globalization co-exist?

Reread the Country Focus “Estimating the Gains from Trade for America” in Chapter 7 and address these two questions: 

What does the Institute for International Economics suggest about the benefits of free trade? 
According to the Institute for International Economics  study, a move toward free trade would cause disruption in employment. Is  it still worth pursuing free trade if it means that some people lose  their jobs? 

Reread the opening case “NAFTA 2.0: The USMCA” in Chapter 9 and address these three questions: 

Discuss NAFTA in the Trump era. What changes to trade based on the new USMCA agreement would he like to see? 
As an American consumer looking for a new car, what does  NAFTA mean to you? Does your response change if you are a consumer from  Mexico or Canada? What about under the new USMCA? 
As CEO of an auto company with manufacturing facilities in Mexico, what does the new USMCA deal mean to you?

Case Analyses must follow the following guidelines:

You must give a quality analysis of the cases based on the key terms  showing mastery, using clear logic, and supporting facts. Also, the  analysis must directly address the case using chapter readings and  research.
Case Analyses test the understanding of key elements of International Business, therefore, they must be thoroughly addressed.
You must use citations with references to document information  obtained from sources. The key elements and concepts of International  Business are found in the sources listed in the syllabus (it is your  duty to search for them, read, analyze, evaluate, summarize, paraphrase  in your answers, and cite the authors who wrote the articles, books,  term papers, memoirs, studies, etc. What it means is that you will have not less than 5 references from the listed sources.
Grammatically correct paper, no typos, and must have obviously been proofread for logic.
Avoid direct quotes, you must paraphrase and cite. If you direct  quote (two words or three words, mission statements, phrases, etc.) you  must include in your citation parenthesis page number or paragraph  number. When you direct quote Brand taglines or Mission Statements, you  must include the Brand name or Company name in the citation parenthesis.
Key terms or Questions must be typed out as headings, with follow up  analysis or answers in paragraph format, and a summary or conclusion to  contextualize your analyses at the end of the paper.

The Cases Analyses must be in APA format

Miami University The Hunger Games Saga Essay

One contemporary work of fiction that tackles ethics on a massive scale is Susan Collins’ The Hunger Games. This trilogy of novels and the movies based on them deal with a variety of moral issues, some of which have relevance for all times of human history, some of which have particular contemporary relevance—they deal with problems that we are facing within human society today, whether or not we are fully aware of them as moral problems.(200 points) Write a paper (4-5 pages). Select some of the moral issues presented in The Hunger Games saga (three to four issues would be a good range, depending on how fully you intend to talk about them). You may use any of the installments in the trilogy of novels by Suzanne Collins (The Hunger Games, Catching Fire, and Mockingjay) or the movies based on them. Begin your paper with a statement about which book(s)/film(s) you are working with (some moral issues change over the course of the saga). Make direct references to situations or dialogue within these stories.aAnalyze the moral issues you have chosen, using your own logic and feelings along with references to philosophers covered in the class (this can include material from the student summaries about contemporary moral problems). Ask what kind of moral theory best helps you answer the moral dilemmas in this story? Virtue theory? Kant’s categorical imperative? Utilitarianism? Something else, or some combination?Here are some examples of moral issues that are obvious in these stories, though you certainly do not need to limit yourself to the examples listed here:Killing: When is it justified, if ever?Civil disobedience (when is it right to resist authority, and by what means—nonviolent? Violent?)Altruism and self-sacrifice. Why do people do good? Why do they sacrifice themselves for others or for a greater purpose than themselves?How should children be treated, including using them as means to an end? (The Capitol uses children as a means of punishing the districts for rebelling, and as a way to keep them afraid of ever rebelling again.)Poverty—the hoarding of resources by a privileged few, while the many work to make that possible.The use of torture.Lying—the protagonists lie frequently. Is this justified? (Peeta, the hands-down “best” person in the story, lies skillfully to protect others, especially Katniss. Katniss also becomes adept at lying, and sometimes struggles more with being dishonest than with the rather obvious issue of killing.)Genetic engineering—the Capitol’s “muttations” (“mutts”), genetically enhanced animals used as weapons.Finally, answer this basic question: If you were put in the same position as the “tributes”, what would you do? (Peeta struggles with this before their first time in the arena: “If I have to die, I want to find a way of showing them that I’m more than just a piece in their games.”)