Those privacy concerns we discussed last week continue!  Health-Care in the United States is certainly a current topic of conversation relevant to each of us.  After reading Chapter 6 in our textbook, please respond to the following;  Consider the privacy and ethical concerns regarding data available through health-focused applications.  Please share at least 2 benefits and 2 negative aspects of the data driven approach to health/clinic-care within today’s society.  Explain how these benefits and downfalls impact us as individuals, and as an overall society.

 
Those privacy concerns we discussed last week continue!  Health-Care in the United States is certainly a current topic of conversation relevant to each of us.  After reading Chapter 6 in our textbook, please respond to the following; 
Consider the privacy and ethical concerns regarding data available through health-focused applications.  Please share at least 2 benefits and 2 negative aspects of the data driven approach to health/clinic-care within today’s society.  Explain how these benefits and downfalls impact us as individuals, and as an overall society.

Please watch this video and respond to the questions below: What evidence do we have that ancient statues were painted? What was Winckelmann’s opinion of white statues? What (19th, 20th, and 21st century) cultural attitudes have been influenced and reinforced by the wide-spread belief that ancient statues were white?

Please watch this video and respond to the questions below: What evidence do we have that ancient statues were painted? What was Winckelmann’s opinion of white statues? What (19th, 20th, and 21st century) cultural attitudes have been influenced and reinforced by the wide-spread belief that ancient statues were white? 

Explain the dirty job horror movies perform for us, according to Stephen King. Do you think horror potentially benefit all of us the way he claims? 

Essay question: 
 
Explain the “dirty job” horror movies perform for us, according to Stephen King.
Do you think horror potentially benefit all of us the way he claims? 
 
Be sure to support your position with specific details taken from your own experiences,
including the media, your observations of others, and your reading 
 
3~4 pages need to be done by the next day. thank you

A 5 year old child and her mother present to your clinic. The mother reports that the child has had a cough and sounds “wheezy” for the last 2 days. She states that the child always gets like this when she is sick. She also reports that the child has been complaining that her right ear hurts. In addition, you notice dry scaly patches on the child’s elbows and behind her knees. What are your differentials and diagnosis, write the rationales: 1-Asthma exacerbation: primary diagnosis: 2-Bronchiolitis causing ear infection: 3-Eczema (Atopic dermatitis): What would you prescribe for each condition (treatment with references).

Pediatric questions
A 5 year old child and her mother present to your clinic. The mother reports that the child has had a cough and sounds “wheezy” for the last 2 days. She states that the child always gets like this when she is sick. She also reports that the child has been complaining that her right ear hurts. In addition, you notice dry scaly patches on the child’s elbows and behind her knees.
What are your differentials and diagnosis, write the rationales:
1-Asthma exacerbation: primary diagnosis:
2-Bronchiolitis causing ear infection:
3-Eczema (Atopic dermatitis):

What would you prescribe for each condition (treatment with references).

Expectations

Assume that before the ice storm of 2003, the weekly demand and supply for ice in the Rochester Metro Area was given by the following equations: D-pre: P=100-Q S-pre: 5+0.5Q a. Draw a graph representing the Rochester ice market before the storm and label it carefully. What was the equilibrium price for the Rochester ice market before the storm? And the total quantity of ice traded?  

Assume that before the ice storm of 2003, the weekly demand and supply for ice in the Rochester Metro Area was given by the following equations:
D-pre: P=100-Q
S-pre: 5+0.5Q
a. Draw a graph representing the Rochester ice market before the storm and label it carefully. What was the equilibrium price for the Rochester ice market before the storm? And the total quantity of ice traded?
 

How would you foster structures that promote healthy communication and networks among and between you, faculty and staff members, students, families, and people in the larger community?

Rules:
*Answer all questions
*Be through
*No plagiarism
Course: School Group Counseling
Effective school counseling is a collaborative process involving school counselors, students, families, teachers, administrators, other school staff, and education stakeholders.
Consider your school’s vision, mission, and key objectives.
Prepare a-word reflection on reporting outcomes. Address the following in your reflection:

How would you foster structures that promote healthy communication and networks among and between you, faculty and staff members, students, families, and people in the larger community?
How would you model appropriate student-to-student, student-to-adult, and adult-to-adult communication?
How would you set norms and expectations for communication, including technology use?

Cite references in your reflection to support your position.

Explain some of the difficulties associated with configuring and maintaining IDSs, given the changing pattern of traffic on networks. Considering these issues, explain why organizations rely heavily on IDSs, even though they do not prevent hackers from penetrating an infrastructure.

 
Intrusion detection systems have fundamental flaws in their designs and functionalities. Intrusion detection does not necessarily prevent intrusions. As more organizations encrypt traffic, it becomes increasingly difficult to track intrusions because IDSs have no capabilities to examine encrypted traffic and are, therefore, unable to recognize problems and create alerts. Engineers rely heavily on IDSs to fight hackers. If configured improperly, the IDS will generate false positive alerts, which can be disastrous to the organization. Too many alerts can cause security administrators to become complacent and overlook important events. Several studies have shown that detections of negative security events can take over six months.
In this discussion, you are going to look at the role of IDSs in protecting digital assets. Research a minimum of three industry publications (e.g., National Institute for Standards & Technology [NIST], Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers [IEEE], Internet Engineering Taskforce [IETF], etc.) on this topic. Address the differences and similarities between IDS and intrusion protection systems (IPS). Explain some of the difficulties associated with configuring and maintaining IDSs, given the changing pattern of traffic on networks. Considering these issues, explain why organizations rely heavily on IDSs, even though they do not prevent hackers from penetrating an infrastructure. Support your statements with evidence from your sources.

Summarize the law or legal principle involved. Summarize the case or event. Share the important facts and highlights that are important from a Human Resources practice perspective

Please follow directions or I will dispute 
Will be checked for plagiarism
please follow template below 
Due Friday November 17th by 8pm 
Part 1 • Summarize the law or legal principle involved. (This can generally be done in one paragraph.) • Summarize the case or event. Share the important facts and highlights that are important from a Human Resources practice perspective. (This can generally be done with one or two short paragraphs.) • Explain why the facts and highlights you chose were important for the practice of HR.  
Part 2 • List at least five ways this case or event might impact the practice of HR. (This is a brainstorming activity. A bulleted list is fine for this.) • Identify which of the five items is most important to HR. Provide an assessment and analysis of that item, along with one directly related specific recommendation for the HR team. The recommendation must be actionable, must be explained, and must be supported with evidence from your readings and research.  
The ideal assignment will include the following: • Introduction  • Response to Part 1 (with citations linked to a reference) • Response to Part 2 (with citations linked to a reference) • Conclusion (with citations linked to a reference) • References (with a minimum of three references)  Requirements: • Submit your assignment in the text box of the designated Unit Assignment Forum.  APA format is not required for any assignment forum submission.  However, all assignments should be well-organized and include an introduction and conclusion.   • Support your answers with evidence from at least three resources (text, readings, research, etc.) using citations and references. • The required length of your entire response is approximately four to five paragraphs (summary, evaluation, comparison, opinion). • Review one to two classmate's postings after posting your submission to the assignment forum. Use the RISE model of peer feedback to provide your classmates with constructive feedback that they may consider when finalizing the final project later in the semester. 

Source: Walsh, D. J. (2019). Employment law for human resource practice (6th edition). Cengage Learning.
https://ambassadored.vitalsource.com/reader/books/9781337670685/pageid/0

Unit4assignment.pdf

Due Date: 11:59 pm EST on Friday of Unit 4 Points: 100
Overview: This week’s assignment forum focuses on the role the EEOC has in preventing
workplace discrimination, which includes harassment and other protections provided
under Title VII. This is the fourth assignment forum related to your course project.
Your Unit 4 assignment forum is based on the EEOC v. Catastrophe Management
Solutions case study found in your unit resources this week. The case involved a claim
of racial discrimination. At issue was the legality of requiring an employee to cut their
dreadlocks to fit their “neat and clean” appearance policy. The appellate court ultimately
affirmed the dismissal of a complaint filed by the EEOC on behalf of an African
American job applicant whose offer of employment was rescinded because she refused
to cut off her dreadlocks. You will explore the role of the EEOC and the topic of Title VII
protections and evaluate the importance of this ruling to human resources practice of
and your role as a human resources practitioner.

Instructions: As the Human Resource Manager at GreenTech Ltd., you are ready to prepare your
next report. You will review, assess, and analyze a topic, event, or case, and based on
your findings, you will share a written report with your supervisor, the Chief Human
Resources Officer (CHRO). Your report will summarize the topic, event, or case and will
include a recommendation for improving HR practice at your company.
Unit 4 Topic:
Read the EEOC v. Catastrophe Management Solutions case study provided in our unit resources this week.
Based on your review of the case study, consider the following:
The appellate court ultimately affirmed the dismissal of a complaint filed by the Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). Consider the determining factors that
led to this conclusion. In responding to this topic, be sure to consider any Title VII
HRM341 – Employment Law
Unit 4 Assignment Forum

specific protections the court referenced in their ruling. The EEOC is the primary
government agency leveraged to prevent workplace discrimination, including the
enforcement of Title VII protections. Consider how the role of the EEOC impacts your
practice as a Human Resources Manager.
Based on your review of the case study, address the role of residency requirements in
hiring practices in general and whether or not residency requirements are, in general, a
valid hiring criterion.
Part 1
• Summarize the law or legal principle involved. (This can generally be done in one
paragraph.)
• Summarize the case or event. Share the important facts and highlights that are
important from a Human Resources practice perspective. (This can generally be
done with one or two short paragraphs.)
• Explain why the facts and highlights you chose were important for the practice of
HR.
Part 2
• List at least five ways this case or event might impact the practice of HR. (This is
a brainstorming activity. A bulleted list is fine for this.)
• Identify which of the five items is most important to HR. Provide an assessment
and analysis of that item, along with one directly related specific recommendation
for the HR team. The recommendation must be actionable, must be explained,
and must be supported with evidence from your readings and research.
(Keep in mind generic statements, broad ideas, unsupported personal opinions, and merely repeating what is in this assignment description do not satisfy the assignment requirements.)
This assignment is your opportunity to demonstrate your understanding of the law or
legal principles based on the case or event reviewed as it relates to the practice of HR.
This assignment is also your opportunity to demonstrate your critical thinking and
analytical skills by using the case or event as a catalyst to explore how HR practices
can be improved.
The goal of this assignment is not to do as much writing as possible but to do as much
focused and thoughtful idea-sharing as possible.
Make sure you use evidence and support for each section of your response.

The ideal assignment will include the following:
• Introduction
• Response to Part 1 (with citations linked to a reference)
• Response to Part 2 (with citations linked to a reference)
• Conclusion (with citations linked to a reference)
• References (with a minimum of three references)

Requirements:
• Submit your assignment in the text box of the designated Unit Assignment
Forum. APA format is not required for any assignment forum submission.
However, all assignments should be well-organized and include an introduction
and conclusion.
• Support your answers with evidence from at least three resources (text, readings,
research, etc.) using citations and references.
• The required length of your entire response is approximately four to five
paragraphs (summary, evaluation, comparison, opinion).
• Review one to two classmate's postings after posting your submission to the
assignment forum. Use the RISE model of peer feedback to provide your
classmates with constructive feedback that they may consider when finalizing the
final project later in the semester.
Be sure to read the criteria below by which your work will be evaluated before you write and again after you write.

Evaluation Rubric for Unit 4 Assignment Forum
CRITERIA
Needs Improvement Proficient
Exemplary
0 – 14 points 15 – 19 points 20 – 25 points
Part # 1 Response

Only answered one aspect of Part 1, did not provide an adequate response, and/or key requirements are missing or not met. Relevancy to the practice of HR missing.
Answered some but not all aspects of Part 1, did not provide a thorough response, and/or key requirements were not fully met. Relevance to the practice of HR is not thoroughly developed and/or not supported.
Answered all aspects of Part 1, provided a thorough response, and all requirements were fully met. Relevance to the practice of HR is clearly and thoroughly stated and fully supported.
Part # 2 Response

Only answered one aspect of Part 2, did not provide an adequate response, and/or key requirements are missing or not met. Relevancy to the practice of HR missing.
Answered some but not all aspects of Part 2, did not provide a thorough response, and/or key requirements were not fully met. Relevance to the practice of HR is not thoroughly developed and/or not supported.
Answered all aspects of Part 2, provided a thorough response, and all requirements were fully met. Relevance to the practice of HR is clearly and thoroughly stated and fully supported.
Response to Classmates

Did not provide adequate feedback using the RISE model and/or provided 0 replies.
Provided adequate constructive feedback using the RISE model that may be used to improve classmate’s work product and/or provided 1 reply.
Provided valuable constructive feedback using the RISE model that may be used to improve the classmate’s work product. Provided 2 or more replies.
0 – 8 points 9 – 13 points 14 – 15 points
Resources 0-1 resources and/or sources are not associated or aligned with the assignment content.
2 resources and/or sources are not clearly associated or aligned with the assignment content.
3 or more resources and/or sources are clearly associated or aligned with the assignment content.
0 – 5 points 6 – 8 points 9 – 10 points
Clear and Professional Writing
Writing and format show significant errors that impede professional presentation.
Writing and format contain few errors that do not impede professional presentation.
Writing and format are clear, professional, and error-free.

Overview:
Instructions:
Requirements:
Evaluation Rubric for Unit 4 Assignment Forum

This weeks material covers receivables/revenues and payables/liabilities. Both areas come with some type of risk. For receivables/revenues, the biggest risks deal with overstatements. For payables/liabilities, the biggest risks deal with understatements. Find the management discussion and analysis in the Form 10-K of a publicly traded company that interests you. (Post a link so everyone can see it.) What risks does the company identify that might lead to the risk of overstating receivables/revenue or understating payables/liabilities? What specific tests might an auditor design based on those risks?

This week’s material covers receivables/revenues and payables/liabilities. Both areas come with some type of risk. For receivables/revenues, the biggest risks deal with overstatements. For payables/liabilities, the biggest risks deal with understatements.
Find the management discussion and analysis in the Form 10-K of a publicly traded company that interests you. (Post a link so everyone can see it.) What risks does the company identify that might lead to the risk of overstating receivables/revenue or understating payables/liabilities? What specific tests might an auditor design based on those risks?

Identify two potential distributive negotiating gambits that Sharon Slade should consider to advance her agenda. Identify two negotiating tactics that she should avoid during the negot

Please see the attachments for help 
fill out the Negotiation Gambits Chart Word. Include the following information:

Identify two potential distributive negotiating gambits that Sharon Slade should consider to advance her agenda.
Identify two negotiating tactics that she should avoid during the negotiating session.
Identify specific gambits that would be the most appropriate for advancing your agenda in the negotiation.

MarissaPond-GambitChart.doc

WCM510NegotiationGambitsChart1.doc

WCM510NegotiationGambitsChart2.doc

`

WCM 510 Negotiation Gambits Chart

Two Potential Distributive Negotiating Gambits for Sharon Slade to Consider:

Two Negotiating Gambits for Sharon Slade to Avoid:

Specific Gambits That Would Advance Your Agenda:

1. Deadline
90 days to complete the PIP and bring forth positive results is a fair way to approach the negotiation. This tacit is a good way to create movement and push forward for results, especially if the goal is to retain Alice as an employee. The deadline should not come as a surprise to Alice but should be reinforced during the meeting as a reminder of the PIP extension that has already been granted and how it goes against Netflix culture.

1. Authoritarian
While Sharon can lend her experience in HR and success at Netflix as a leader, mentor and successful business woman, she also needs to positively acknowledge Alice and her 10 year loyalty to the team. A top down approach to this negotiation may have Alice feeling as if there is no room for collaboration and can heighten power differences between leader and employee.

1. Deadline
This sets the framework for this meeting and any future follow ups to discuss the PIP. Giving a clear deadline puts pressure on Alice to meet expectations. Two things can happen after the deadline- this prolongs the inevitable and Alice is let go due to poor performance or Alice kicks into high gear and accepts the pressure. Deadline is a marker of exception Netflix made to help Alice, and results are required after 90 days.

2. The Bluffer
Competition within the entertainment industry is a powerful tacit. This gambit should be used thoughtfully, in a way that expresses the rapid changing industry and the need for future talent. Sharon can make known the attractiveness and power of Alice’s current position and how in demand her role is. If Alice knows her job at Netflix is desired by others and that she is replaceable, this may motivate her to improve.

2. The Chipper
This tacit would chip away the favorable rewards of Alice’s current role as Operations Director. This could be seen as sneaky, forcing Alice to accept part of a deal that might be less attractive to her. Removing negotiated items or concealing the meeting agenda can come across as a power move by Sharon and forces Alice to possibly accept a term she is not comfortable with or disagrees with.

2. Competition
Expressing to Alice that her position is highly competitive may ignite a fire in her to keep her job. This could also highlight how the entertainment world is inundated with applicants and propel Alice to remain part of the dream team.

Work Cited
Admin. (2022, January 27). Aggressive negotiation tactics: be prepared & keep your cool. Piscari. https://piscari.com/aggressive-negotiation-tactics/
8 Manipulative Negotiation Tactics and How To Handle Them. (n.d.).
https://www.bakercommunications.com/archive/apr13/negotiation040113.html?campId=70140000000flkz
Shonk, K. (2023, October 24). How an authoritarian leadership style blocks effective negotiation. PON – Program on Negotiation at Harvard Law
School. https://www.pon.harvard.edu/daily/leadership-skills-daily/how-an-authoritarian-leadership-style-blocks-effective-negotiation/
,

WCM 510 Negotiation Gambits Chart
Prompt: As you prepare to write the Module Nine discussion post, review the readings on managing negotiations provide in the module resources area.
Then, complete the negotiating gambits chart below with the following information:
· Identify two potential distributive negotiating gambits that Sharon Slade should consider to advance her agenda.
· Identify two negotiating gambits that she should avoid during the negotiating session.
· Identify specific gambits that would be the most appropriate for advancing your agenda in the negotiation.
Post your chart as an attachment to your post. In your replies to peers, offer your thoughts on the gambits they have identified and their potential effects on the outcome of the negotiations—both positive and negative. Defend your choices by providing reasons. Suggest other gambits to use with a hesitant negotiation partner to close the deal. Include your chart as an attachment to your post. Your work on this discussion post will help you prepare Section V: Negotiation Tactics and Strategies of your final project submission .

Two Potential Distributive Negotiating Gambits for Sharon Slade to Consider:

Two Negotiating Gambits for Sharon Slade to Avoid:

Specific Gambits That Would Advance Your Agenda:

1. Flinching – When Sharon displays a visible reaction to Alice’s hesitation or demands, it could help her gain a more positive outcome. The physical reaction would signal that what was being proposed is not expected or acceptable. This type of response should be appropriate and not exaggerated to cause adversity with the other party.

1. Nibbling – “A technique to gain a minor concession from the other party after negotiations have been finalized.” Given the circumstances of the negotiation, including Alice’s past performance, nibbling may create adversity and unacceptable circumstances for Alice. Nibling could be positive for Sharon since she could gain back concessions that were given up during negotiations.

1. Making concessions – Sharon may need to give up concessions to get the desired outcome from Alice. Sharon will have a good understanding of her BATNA and where to concede during the negotiation. If Sharon makes too many concessions, it will become evident that Netflix has a firm position to separate with Alice.

2. Good Guy/Bad Guy – “A technique to sway or counter the direction of an agreement by bringing in a third party to the process normally not present during the discussion.” Using this gambit could work to Sharon’s advantage during the negotiation. A third party could reiterate the company philosophy and double down on the appropriate severance packages for employees that were terminated under the same conditions. This may also be viewed as backhanded or manipulative by Alice.

2. Feel, Felt, Found – “Telling the other party you know how they feel, and how you once felt the same way.” Sharon Slade is a well-known HR executive with a highly successful past. Getting Alice to believe that she has endured or been through the same situation may seem disingenuous and be hard to sell. There may be aspects of the negotiation that this will work for; however, it should be avoided.

2. Propose Multiple Options (Carrell & Heavrin, 2004) – Sharon may find it impactful to offer several options to Alice in negotiation. The proposed options can lead to a win faster since they are all within Sharon’s ZOPA. Several options will also allow for the Alice to choose an appropriate offer that allow her a way to win as well (Carrell & Heavrin, 2004).

Reference
Carrell, M. R., & Heavrin, C. (2004).  The Everyday Negotiator: 50 Practical Negotiation Tactics for Work and Life: Vol. 1st ed. HRD Press. https://eds-p-ebscohost-com.ezproxy.snhu.edu/eds/ebookviewer/ebook/bmxlYmtfXzEzNTk4NV9fQU41?sid=d99f63a8-957d-464b-aa7f-ffe14aec90ec@redis&vid=5&format=EB&rid=1

,

WCM 510 Negotiation Gambits Chart
Prompt: As you prepare to write the Module Nine discussion post, review the readings on managing negotiations provide in the module resources area.
Then, complete the negotiating gambits chart below with the following information:
· Identify two potential distributive negotiating gambits that Sharon Slade should consider to advance her agenda.
· Identify two negotiating gambits that she should avoid during the negotiating session.
· Identify specific gambits that would be the most appropriate for advancing your agenda in the negotiation.

Two Potential Distributive Negotiating Gambits for Sharon Slade to Consider:

Two Negotiating Gambits for Sharon Slade to Avoid:

Specific Gambits That Would Advance Your Agenda:

1.Sharon should approach the negotiation with a win-win mindset. This mindset and process will ensure the “me versus you” mentality and attitude is squashed before the first handshake is given. The distribution may not be completely even between both parties, but the outcome ensures that both feel satisfied and are able to move forward.

1.Sharon should avoid any type of emotional manipulation. There is going to be a certain level already on Alice’s part of intimidation, as her future with the organization is potentially in question, which triggers many other emotional strains in the process. Sharon should focus on proving to Alice the value of what she is presenting to her perspective and what she has to initially offer her, rather than putting Alice in an awkward position that can give her the impression that she is backed into a corner.

1.One gambit that will advance an agenda again falls towards ethical behavior, and that is showing your cards. Being able to state what you want while also providing the justification for that want, encourages both sides to be open and provides all the necessary information pieces up front to focus on a positive negotiation that contributes to a win-win situation. Think of it as a lighthouse, and no matter how far to the left or right the conversation strays, the information laid out, is the beacon that con bring the negotiation back to center.

2. Another approach that Sharon should consider would thinking beyond the short-term. Looking beyond the short term, allows for a better aspect of negotiating terms which still ties into a win-win situation. Beyond short term is a better situation as well for the organization regarding positive reputation and continued forward thinking culture.

2.The other type of gambit Sharon should avoid deals with ethical behavior. Sharon should avoid the tactic of leaving out a specific detail(s) that may be crucial in the negotiationg process for either Sharon or Alice. This is also known as “duping”. Ensuring all details are present, accounted for, and conveyed accurately and ethically will ensure both Sharon’s and the organizaiton’s reputation for ethical behavior, and will also provide Alice with peace of mind that the negotiation process was indeed genuine.

2. The other gambit focuses more on mental health in the moment, which can be instrumental for both parties. Being able to identify when to take a timeout is important. Cooler heads will always prevail in negotiation, and sometimes it is best to take a break from the room, the table, and each other for a few minutes to refocus, breathe a bit (without duress), and return refreshed. This tactic also will help in the process in the matter of respect, because as emotions may raise, tone, words and insuations can result which may not necessary be true or intended.

References:
Masterclass. (2022, February 28). Distributive Negotiation: What is Distributive Negotiation? Retrieved from https://www.masterclass.com/articles/distributive-negotiation
Lares, A. (2023). 9 Negotiating Techniques to Avoid. Retrieved from https://www.shapironegotiations.com/negotiations/avoid-these-9-negotiating-techniques/