What advantages would you see for expanding internationally in today’s market?
Global Engagement: Students will be able to demonstrate willingness to engage in local, global, international, and intercultural problem solving. (Starbucks)
Questions:
What would you do differently as a decision maker in to respond to the current global conditions. Why?
What advantages would you see for expanding internationally in today’s market?
Identify the core competencies of this company. Identify at least two strategies the company can employ when transferring these core abilities to the international business arena.
Global Perspective: Students will be able to conduct a multi-perspective analysis of local, global, international, and intercultural problems. (Starbucks)
Question: Identify the core competencies of this company. Identify at least two strategies the company can employ when transferring these core abilities to the international business arena. Justify your answer. (. 1 page)
Using the company Starbucks, Assess and list the major socio-cultural, economic, legal and geo-political issues and trends facing this company. Briefly describe how these might present a challenge to the company when expanding globally
Global Learning Assignment Instructions (Starbucks)
APA referencing where appropriate.
Thank you!
Global Awareness: Students will be able to demonstrate knowledge of the interrelatedness of local, global, international, and intercultural issues, trends, and systems. (Starbucks)
Question: Using the company Starbucks, Assess and list the major socio-cultural, economic, legal and geo-political issues and trends facing this company. Briefly describe how these might present a challenge to the company when expanding globally (2 pages).
examine the effectiveness of 3MDR for veterans having treatment-resistant PTSD.
Quantitative Article Critique
Citation
Van Gelderen, M., Nijdam, M., Haagen, J., & Vermetten, E. (2020). Interactive Motion-Assisted Exposure Therapy for Veterans with Treatment-Resistant Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Psychotherapy And Psychosomatics, 89(4), 215-227. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1159/000505977
Article Summary
“Interactive Motion-Assisted Exposure Therapy for Veterans with Treatment-Resistant Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Trial” by Marieke J. van Gelderena, Mirjam J. Nijdama, Joris F.G. Haagend, and Eric Vermetten is quantitative research focusing on studying the efficacy of the 3MDR for veterans having treatment-resistant post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). It is fundamental to highlight veterans with PTSD appear to benefit from evidence-based interventions than the other PTSD groups. Significantly, 3MDR, virtual reality, and motion-assisted exposure therapy provide treatment within a stimulating, personalized, and immersive context (Van Gelderen et al., 2020, p. 1). Among the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) partners, there have been significant efforts towards preparation and mental health intervention for the military (Van Gelderen et al., 2020, p. 1). However, it is essential to point out that many veterans still suffer from PTSD after deployment despite the spirited efforts to provide help. Among veterans, PTSD is viewed as a highly disabling condition linked with reduced life satisfaction, social exclusions, unemployment, and impaired function of families. Essentially, this condition is considered to have the greatest economic effect on society. As a result, there is a need to use innovative approaches to treat this condition, especially among veterans.
The study deploys a randomized controlled trial. The study involved 43 treatment-resistant veterans recruited between 2015 and 2018 from two tertiary mental health care facilities within the Netherlands (Van Gelderen et al., 2020, p. 3). Only participants aged between 18 and 70, had mastery of the Dutch language, satisfied the DSM-5 PTSD criteria and were resilient to treatment, classified as persevering PTSD diagnosis, and absence of improvement on the severity of symptoms after complete therapy or recurrent failed individual trauma-based therapy failure and an at least six months treatment time. The researchers kept the exclusion criteria low to recruit a representative sample. There was a comparison between 3MDR and a non-specific treatment component control population. The primary result was the baseline PTSD symptoms rated by a clinician after the 3MDR and during the 12- and 16-week follow-up (Van Gelderen et al., 2020, p. 3). Results indicate a greater decline in the severity of PTSD symptoms from the baseline to the endpoint for the 3MDR than the control group. The researchers did not find any significant between-group variation for the PTSD symptoms during the intervention, will all time points included. There was also a lower drop-out rate, 7%, while around 45% of PTSD patients clinically improved. It can be noted that the visual technology, 3MDR reduces PTSD symptoms among veterans. This method has been associated with successful PTSD treatments. Besides, the low drop-out rate may show increased engagement.
Level of Evidence
This is level 1 evidence because it uses the randomized control trial (RCT). RCT is considered an experimental type of impact examination where the population getting the treatment and the control group is chosen randomly from the qualified population. Besides, it is usually primary research. In this study, 43 veterans were randomly selected from two tertiary mental healthcare facilities in the Netherlands. The 3MDR treatment was used in 22 veterans, while the control group contained 21 individuals. This article produces quality and generalizable primary evidence concerning using the virtual intervention approach and its success in treating PTSD among veterans. The evidence is generated from the primary investigation of the success of 3MDR treatment for PTSD among veterans. From the research, it is essential to note that virtual-based PTSD treatments, including 3MDR, have an increased success rate among veterans. This study can be used to suggest the continued use of these intervention approaches in treating PTSD among veterans and the general population because PTSD is fast becoming a global nightmare. Levels of evidence are predicated on the idea that certain research types have more rigor than others, and that these higher-quality study designs provide associated clinical decision-making greater confidence (Tomlin & Borgetto, 2011, p. 190). Internal validity is strongest in Level I trials, giving researchers confidence that if they choose this intervention for their patients, they will get similar results. This implies that research with higher internal validity will have better external validity automatically.
Critique
Research Purpose
While the researcher did not clearly state the purpose of the research, it is accessible and can be derived from the objective. The study’s primary purpose was to examine the effectiveness of 3MDR for veterans having treatment-resistant PTSD. The secondary purpose is to find knowledge in the research study conducted to find its relevance in 3MDR treatments, which in turn can serve as future background literature for future research studies.
Discuss the implications for occupational therapy practice with adults.
(Evidence Based Practice
ACOTE Standard B:6:4
For this assignment you are to be the consumer and synthesizer of research of occupational therapy interventions to prevent falls with adults in the hospital or community. Prior to proceeding, you also need to clear your topic with Annie. You must locate a quantitative research article from peered reviewed journals published within the past 10 years that Address the effectiveness of Occupational therapy intervention to prevent falls in the community or hospital with a diagnosis ( adult population). The articles needs to be quantitative. Summarize the findings of each article into the paper. In addition, you will present this information to your peers in an informal format along with a one-page handout for each student (see template I have attached)Note: make sure that the article that you are referencing is a research article. You may choose to work in a pair for this assignment.
Your paper should include the following: Use these headings in your paper.
⦁ Brief description of the diagnosis / age group or intervention approach and cited; (pre-approved by Annie)
⦁ Summary of each study:
⦁ The purpose of the study.
⦁ Level of evidence of the study and the source for that level (use level of evidence from guidelines at bottom)
⦁ Procedures and methods used
⦁ Results and findings.
⦁ Critical appraisal of the study (pertinent issues regarding the following: purpose (see review forms ), type of research (see review forms), methods (see review forms), sample, intervention (see review forms), outcome measures (see review forms), analysis, results, conclusions, quality / relevance / applicability) – pull insights from the McMaster’s review forms and the critical review form I have attached State whether or not the information from the study is credible based on the elements of the study. (MAKE SURE THE REVIEW FORMS ARE BEING FOLLOWS)
⦁ Discussion of implications for occupational therapy practice with adults. Here you should state how the information should be used in OT practice with adults, their families / caregivers, and with other professionals.
In addition to your paper to hand in, you will be doing a 5-10 minute professional presentation to your
classmates about your inquiry. As part of your professional presentation, compile a one page handout
of information for the audience that gives the APA citations for the articles and a summary of the
findings.
Using the Coupled Polya Urn model, discuss how Microsoft succeeded in winning the browser wars
Essay Question:
This is the question I need written:
Using the Coupled Polya Urn model, discuss how Microsoft succeeded in winning the browser wars
Use sources provided, make harvard references at the end when referencing pages used in the essay.
Example of how to reference sources BUT PLEASE USE PAGE NUMBERS :
Arthur, W.B. (1989) “Competing technologies, increasing returns and lock-in by historical events”, Economic
Journal, 99 (394), pp.116-131.
Case Study: den Uijl, S. and de Vries, H.J. (2013) “Pushing technological progress by strategic manoeuvring:
The triumph of Blu-ray over HD-DVD”, Business History, 55(8), pp.1361-1384
No more than 750 words please
Assess the following evidential issues
Description
Question
Doris has been charged with drugs offences involving intent to supply. The prosecution’s case is that Doris is a
member of a local gang – the Strand – involved in dealing drugs. The police discovered a considerable quantity
of drugs and £1000 in cash at Doris’s flat. The police’s discovery was part of a large on-going operation in the
local area into the activities of the Strand. Doris denies the charges, claiming that she did not know the drugs
were at her flat and claiming that someone else must have stashed them there.
Assess the following evidential issues:
a) The prosecution wishes to adduce evidence of Wilson, the owner of a local restaurant. During the
investigation, Wilson told the police at interview that on several occasions over the previous months, he had
purchased small quantities of cocaine from Doris for personal use. Wilson is now refusing to testify because the
Strand have threatened to burn down his restaurant.
b) The prosecution wishes to adduce evidence of texts messages they discovered on Doris’s phone in order to
establish that she is a drug dealer. The texts that Doris had received state: “Thanks for the coke. Good stuff. Be
round same time next week”; another states “Have the cash. Ur coke is good – worth the extra. Be round tonight
at 8”.
c) The prosecution wishes to adduce evidence of the fact that Doris has one previous conviction for fraud (in
2013) and burglary (in 2015), and two previous convictions for drugs offences involving possession of
marijuana with intent to supply (in 2011 and 2017).
produce a systematic and critical review of empirical studies focussed on a chosen topic area.
Assessment Specification
This dissertation requires you to complete a systematic review of literature; you will need
to produce a systematic and critical review of empirical studies focussed on a chosen topic
area.
HSM009 Dissertation: Suggested structure for your systematic review
Below you will find some general guidance on how to format your systematic review for
the dissertation.
• There will be variations in how you present your dissertation work, this will depend
on the type of review – e.g. quantitative, qualitative or mixed-methods review.
• You should also refer to relevant guidance on the conduct or reporting of your type
of review to determine whether adaptations are necessary
• It would be wise to read some published systematic reviews in areas aligned to
your review to determine if there are any templates that may help you with
presenting your work.
These guidelines have been developed using the preferred reporting items for systematic
reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA statement) (Moher et al., 2009).
Title:
You should clearly state the type of review that you are doing (i.e. systematic review) and
the focus of the review. The focus of the review should be specified according to the
framework used to structure your research question e.g. PICO or PEO etc.
- PICOS is an acronym for a standard minimum set of descriptors employed in Cochrane
reviews covering: Population; Intervention; Comparison; Outcome; Study design.
Abstract (awarded as part of overall presentation):
It is recommended to write this after you have completed the rest of your dissertation.
The abstract should be structured, and should provide the following information: - Background: provide a brief background with reference to review objectives
- Methods: refer to data sources, study eligibility, study appraisal and synthesis
methods
HSM009 2021-22 - Results: include a brief summary of the synthesised results
- Conclusions and implications: Include a brief conclusion with implications for
practice and research.
Typically abstracts are between 300 and 500 words in length i.e. usually not more than one
A4 page .
Each chapter below should contain a brief (2-3 sentences) introduction (at the
beginning) and summary (at the end) and be structured using subheadings to signpost
the reader.
Introduction (15%):
You should provide some broad context to the topic area, who does it impact? (Including
some statistics would be helpful here) and why this is an important topic (some reference
to contemporary policy is important).
You should also include some reference to what we currently know about the topic area
(i.e. what is the current evidence base?). You may refer to a systematic review in a closely
aligned area and state how your review will differ.
Overall: You should describe the rationale for the review in the context of what is already
known.
It is important that you explicitly state the research question that your review will address
with reference to a framework (e.g. PEO – population, exposure, outcome or PICO –
participants, interventions, comparisons, outcomes.).
It is also important that you clearly articulate the aims and objectives of the literature
review. Remember objectives are smaller bite size versions of the aim.
Methods (20%):
The purpose of this section (covering search strategy, eligibility criteria, study selection,
data collection, critical appraisal and synthesis on the marking rubric) is to provide
sufficient detail to the reader to enable another researcher to replicate the review
process. This section will be tailored to the type of review (i.e. qualitative, quantitative
and mixed methods) you are conducting.
It is important that you also demonstrate understanding of the systematic review process
by including some justification for your decisions. It is useful to refer to a recognised
systematic review methodology during this chapter e.g. Cochrane or JBI or CEBM to help
guide the process.
You will need to describe the search strategy, including the methods used to identify
relevant primary studies, extract relevant information, assess the quality of the identified
studies, and synthesize the findings. This list is not intended to be exhaustive and should
be adapted according to the type of review you are reporting.
Your methods section will include sub-sections such as:
HSM009 2021-22
▪ Eligibility criteria – Specify study characteristics (such as PICO or PEO, length of
follow-up) and report characteristics (such as years considered, language, publication
status) used as criteria for eligibility. You will need to give a rationale for each with
some references.
▪ Information sources – Describe all information sources employed in the search (such
as databases used with dates of coverage) and the date last searched with
justification for decisions about the data sources and time coverage.
▪ Search strategy – Present your full electronic search strategy for at least one
database, including any limits used, such that it could be repeated. This search can be
included in the appendices and referred to. In the main body of the text include
explicit reference in the concepts searched (it may be helpful to include this in a table
format, see formative assignment guidelines and should include the use of
truncation/wildcards, phrase searching and the use of Boolean operators).
▪ Study selection – State the process for selecting studies (i.e. how were the inclusion
and exclusion criteria applied to each study).
▪ Data extraction process – Describe the method of data extraction from reports. What
was included in the standardized data extraction forms?
▪ Quality Assessment: – Describe methods used for assessing the quality of the studies
and how this information will be used in the data synthesis. What type of critical
appraisal tool did you use? And what is the rationale for using the chosen tool?
▪ Synthesis of results – Describe the methods of handling data and combining results of
studies (e.g. vote count procedure; meta-analysis; thematic synthesis; metaethnography). For all types of review you should provide sufficient detail to allow
another researcher to replicate the procedure. A rationale should be provided for
the approach you have chosen (you should not include the findings of studies in this
section – this is about how you will manage/present the findings in the next chapter).
Perform a nuanced and applied critique of the evidence in the CAT, which goes beyond the summary critique normally found in a basic CAT.
Assessment Details:
You will be expected to undertake a 10,000 word dissertation in the format of an extended
critically appraised topic (CAT). This should be on a clinically focused topic relevant to your
field of practice and should be more than a basic critique of the evidence. It could use any one
of the types of review question identified by Munn et al., (2018).
To develop the CAT you will be expected to undertake a structured search of the literature and
identify relevant studies. As the number of studies that you find will depend upon your
question, it is not possible to be prescriptive on the number of studies that you should include,
but they should be reflective of the body of literature and systematically identified. You will be
expected to perform a detailed appraisal of each study using appropriate tools, such as CASP,
RoBIS and RoB2; and critique the evidence at both study and review level using GRADE or
CONQual. You will be expected to describe the search undertaken; the critique, analysis and
synthesis of results and critically discuss it’s application to practice using an appropriate tool
such as the GRADE or WHO Evidence to Decision Frameworks. Throughout you will be
expected to use a recognisable method and to use standard tools.
Pass Mark:
The pass mark for this assessment is 50%.
You are required to achieve the minimum pass mark in this assessment.
Marking Criteria:
This piece of work will be double marked
Please find the marking criteria below. They are descriptions, based on the module’s learning
outcomes, of the skills, knowledge or attributes you need to demonstrate in order to complete an
assessment successfully. Your feedback will be based on them.
The marking criteria have a proportion of marks allocated to them
Please also consult the Grade Related Criteria in the Programme Handbook for descriptions of the
level of skills, knowledge or attributes you need to demonstrate to achieve a certain grade or mark
in an assessment.
Assignment – Extended Critically Appraised Topic (CAT)
- Undertake a 10 000 word extended CAT on a clinically focussed topic.
- Perform a nuanced and applied critique of the evidence in the CAT, which goes beyond the
summary critique normally found in a basic CAT. - Make evidence-based recommendations considering all of the relevant criteria from an Evidence
to Decision Framework.
create a customer engagement audit and strategic plan.
Topic:
You will create a customer engagement audit and strategic plan. You are a new marketing manager for your
chosen organization who has recently completed a module on customer engagement. You have been asked to
produce this report for your Board of Directors that analyses the current customer engagement practices within
the organization (the audit), showcases how much you know about customer engagement, and provides
recommendations about customer engagement (the strategic plan).
Description
Customer Engagement Audit: Provide a critical analysis of the customer engagement practices currently in
operation within your chosen organisation. To do this, you will need to draw on concepts, theories, and models
identified throughout the module as well as examples of best practice used within the industry
Recommendation: Recommend a new engagement strategy to enhance customer engagement within the
organisation. The list below provides some examples of new engagement strategies, but you are not limited by
this list – feel free to consider other ideas. Justify your choice with reference to relevant theory. You need to
ensure that your recommendation follows on from your analysis in the audit. Examples of a new engagement
strategy could include one of the following: –
