In the first draft, you’ll analyze and explain an argument of your choice (the Introduction paper and article are attached
In the first draft, you’ll analyze and explain an argument of your choice (the Introduction paper and article are
attached. the first draft should:
Explain the argument of a text (identify premises and conclusion)
This is similar to summarizing the article, but you aren’t just describing or paraphrasing every piece of the
article step by step. Instead, you should identify the main ideas or claims in the article (the premises) and why
they are reasons to believe the conclusion or thesis (the main claim the article is trying to convince the reader is
true). Then explain these things in your own words, as if to someone thinking about these ideas for the first time.
There are multiple good ways to explain an argument. Students may focus their explanations on different parts
of the same argument and both have good papers.
In Philosophical writing, we discuss what a claim means, whether it is true, and what reasons/evidence we have
to think it is true or false. We typically do not evaluate or explain an argument based on its style, tone, or
rhetoric.
Discuss what you think about the text’s argument (explain whether you agree or disagree and why)
This should be just 1-2 paragraphs of the first draft. Most of the draft should be dedicated to explaining the
argument of the article.
Formatting:
1-2 pages. Times New Roman, 12pt, double spaced, 1 in. margins.
2 pages is the MAXIMUM. I will not read past the second page.
Your paper should be a clear, concise, and well-organized complete essay (with an introduction, conclusion,
body paragraphs, and transitions).
No use of direct quotes or outside research.
This assignment asks you to explain many things in a relatively small amount of space. The paper should be
short but dense with content. I’ve designed it this way so that you must be careful and deliberate about what you
say and how you say it.
Focus on Subtle discrimination against minorities in healthcare and higher education and make recommendations on how to solve it.
Your essay should focus on Subtle discrimination against minorities in healthcare and higher education and
make recommendations on how to solve it.
what provides a more authentic travel experience, a hotel, or an Airbnb?
What’s a more authentic travel experience, a hotel, or Airbnb?
Essay
Consumers are often seeking authenticity when they travel to connect to a place and its people. Organisations
such as Airbnb have developed their reputation on the premise that it provides visitors with an ‘authentically’
local experience. This reputation for authenticity can have both negative and positive impacts for local
communities.
Debate exists on what provides a more authentic travel experience, a hotel, or an Airbnb? Your task is to
consider the sections below to address this topic and present your arguments.
Your essay should comprise of the following section:
a) Introduction (150 words)
b) Define authenticity and commodification and discuss their application to Airbnb and hotels. As part of
this discussion consider the question – what’s a more authentic travel experience, a hotel, or an
Airbnb? (300 words)
c) Using supporting research, discuss the positives and negatives of authenticity (300 words)
d) Provide recommendations on how a destination can manage the issues you have identified drawing
on examples from other destinations and what can be done to take advantage of the opportunities
and overcome the challenges (300 words)
e) Conclusion to summarise key points (150 words)
IMPORTANT NOTES:
• You should make use of your own research on Airbnb, knowledge gained from classes, as well as other
academic research to support information presented.
• Your essay should be well-referenced, using a mix of industry sources, academic books, and research journal
articles.
• Submit your essay as a Word Document to Turnitin via MyWAI.
• Refer to this article as a starting point : What offers a more authentic travel experience, a hotel or
Airbnb?- Lonely Planet
Order bid
write a research paper on a topic of their own choosing in the form of a literature review.
The Discipline Research Project (DRP) is different to all other modules studied for your degree as
it is the only module where the student develops, completes and submits their assessment
without receiving any lectures in the subject of their assessment. This approach to learning is
o�en termed ‘Student Self-Directed Learning’ or ‘Student-Centred Learning’ (SCL). SCL can be
defined as learning that: ‘Provides students with flexibility in the pace, place, �me and content
of their learning’. Think of SCL as: students’ ac�ve learning + lecturer support and feedback.
SCL emphasises student responsibility. Students are encouraged to:
• plan their own learning;
• take the ini�a�ve in interac�ng with lecturers and other students;
• be involved in researching material for themselves;
• rely less on didac�c (one way) teaching; and,
• assess their own learning.
To assist in your DRP, students are given support in two specific ways:
- Each student is allocated a DRP supervisor who provides guidance and feedback on the
development of your research. Regular communica�on with your supervisor is important and it
will be beneficial to maintain this throughout the whole trimester. - A series of lectures / workshops are delivered to address specific skills that will aid the
produc�on of a strong, analy�cal research paper that successfully addresses your chosen topic
in rela�on to the iden�fied goals you have set yourself. These sessions are delivered in the first
six weeks of the module.
Guidance will be provided in the �me-tabled sessions and by liaison with your allocated DRP
supervisor. The DRP module requires each student to write a research paper on a topic of their
own choosing in the form of a literature review. A literature review is an objec�ve, cri�cal
summary of exis�ng published research literature relevant to the topic under considera�on.
The approach to be adopted is: - Undertake an ini�al literature review in a chosen area and present a two-page research
proposal to your supervisor for comment and feedback by the end of taught week 2. - Undertake literature review using secondary data, presen�ng an argument based upon
findings from the literature and reflec�on upon these findings; and, - Produce a 5000-word report of this knowledge and understanding of the topic in a structured
and informa�ve manner.
Undertake data analysis using a data set provided.
Title page, table of contents and appendix do not count against your page limit.
SPSS print outputs, relevant graphs and charts required as appendix.
Tables/Figures: Should be numbered (e.g., Fig 1. Regression results) and appropriately referenced in the text, e.g., see Figure 1. Tables and charts should be placed in the text at the point you discuss them.
SPSS outputs: Direct copy-pasting SPSS outputs into text should be avoided. Raw SPSS text should be placed in the appendix and assign a name appropriately. Appendices do not count in word limit. You will undertake data analysis using a data set provided. The emphasis of the project will be on interpreting output and making managerial recommendations based on the analysis conducted. The coursework is in report format
write a report based upon an aircraft accident that made a significant impact on the field of Aviation Safety.
Written Report– The student will be required to write a report based upon an aircraft accident that made a significant impact on the field of Aviation Safety. This report will be a minimum of 5 full pages. (not including title, abstract, reference page or pictures/graphs).
Requirements:
The first 3 pages will detail the accident and given facts. NTSB report details
The last 2 pages will describe the safety issue the accident identified, what is being done to rectify it and is the solution working.
Identify a relevant issue in practice nursing, critically evaluate the implications for practice development and how you as a Practice Nurse can facilitate change within the general practice setting.
You are required to complete a 3000 word essay. Any tables of content, figures within the text, complete references and appendices[1] are not included in your word count.
You will be expected to identify a relevant issue in practice nursing, critically evaluate the implications for practice development and how you as a Practice Nurse can facilitate change within the general practice setting. This essay will provide you an opportunity to demonstrate your knowledge and to relate how health policy has been a catalyst for change in the primary care setting. You will be expected to identify a relevant issue in practice nursing and which will be focused on a subject area over the five taught days of this module, critically evaluate the implications for practice development and how you can facilitate change within the general practice setting. Detailed guidance will be provided by the module leader during the module. Detailed guidance will be provided by the module leader during the module
[1] Figures, Tables and Appendices are optional
Point out the parts (by circling or highlighting) that are confusing to you in each picture and describe what are confusing to you.
This Redesign Clinic is worth 30 points, 10 points for each of the three questions:
Find 4 pictures of confusing showers – they can be from Internet searches or the showers you have seen and
taken pictures of. Point out the parts (by circling or highlighting) that are confusing to you in each picture and
describe what are confusing to you.
Using 1 of the 4 pictures, identify and describe 2 contributing factors to your confusion (this step is similar to
case discussion’s step 3c) (for example, the faucets did not have labels on them and the turning direction of the
handle is unclear and why they are confusing). I expect to see at least 5 sentences in your response. Be detailed
and specific and explain what contributed to the confusion.
Using the same picture, propose and describe 2 solutions to minimize the confusion (this step is similar to case
discussion’s step 3d) (for example, adding labels to the faucets and adding the turning direction to the handle and
how these will improve user experience). I expect to see at least 5 sentences in your response. Be detailed and
specific and explain what and why the solutions should minimize the confusion.
(I’m going to attach a screenshot of the full instructions because I wasn’t able to copy paste it), and I will also
attach the rubric, and two examples others students did
Discuss and analyse marketing and strategic implications for the company(s) featured,
The student will be expected to:
- Consider and research the background to the company(s)/scenario and global marketing topics and theory relevant to the case
- Critically evaluate the literature, theory and marketing information relating to the case study and assess the impact and influence of key factors on the case scenario
- Discuss and analyse marketing and strategic implications for the company(s) featured, draw conclusions from the critical evaluation of the scenario and make recommendations that contribute to the creation of solutions for any problems facing the company(s) identified in the case and through the students own evaluation.
Analyse a specific change that you have experienced over the last two years, during the covid-19 outbreak and how the pandemic has changed, the way businesses have managed.
Brief
Write a (structured) essay of 4500 words (±10%). In this essay, you will analyse a specific change that you have
experienced over the last two years, during the covid-19 outbreak and how the pandemic has changed, the way
businesses have managed. This must be within your current or previous organisations where you have worked.
You must write about this in relation to your previous organisation where you have worked or that you are
experiencing within your current organisation. Specific content is outlined below.
