Apply “Enabling Others to Act, Fostering Cooperation, and Strengthening Others” through a Christian Worldview lens to explain how it could improve the leadership within the organization.
Subordinate Support Assignment Instructions
Overview
This assignment provides you with the opportunity to further analyze the organization that you selected back in Module 3: Week 3, from a leadership perspective. This assignment will enable you to gain a deeper understanding of how this organization supports subordinates through effective leadership. Instructions In this assignment, discuss similarities in delegation within the organization compared to Kouzes and Posner’s thoughts on “Enable Others to Act.” Apply the leadership philosophies of “Fostering Cooperation” and “Strengthening Others” to the management styles that exist within the organization that you selected. Identify and explain how the organization effectively creates a collaborative criminal justice work environment through effective leadership. Apply “Enabling Others to Act, Fostering Cooperation, and Strengthening Others” through a Christian Worldview lens to explain how it could improve the leadership within the organization. This organization may be any criminal justice organization. To gain insight into this organization, internet research on the organization’s leadership approach or interviews with higher-level management may be used to collect data for this assignment.This assignment is derived from the subject matter in your weekly assigned reading associated with Kouzes and Posner’s research, the overall construct of leadership, and organizational leadership. · The length of the assignment is required to be 5 pages. o The page count does not include the title page, abstract, reference section, or any extra material. · This assignment is required to be in current APA format.· There is not a minimum number of citations required for this assignment.· Acceptable sources include scholarly research from the past 5 years. Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
What advice does the FBI provide in protecting against computer fraud? Do you feel that the Government is doing a sufficient job in this area?
All posts must be a minimum of 250 words. APA reference. 100% original work. no plagiarism.1. What advice does the FBI provide in protecting against computer fraud? Do you feel that the Government is doing a sufficient job in this area?2. Define COBIT and it’s control objective. Do you feel the framework is detailed enough to serve your organization? Why or why not?3. What are the components of a good policy framework? Provide an example of each of these components.4. What is the Deming cycle approach? How does this approach help improve quality?5. Why is it important for IT Auditors to know about the legal environment of information systems?
What issues led to the emergence of the SDGs
Coursework Essay
Write an individual essay, which should about 3,500 words (excluding appendices and bibliographies):
A critical analysis on ONE Sustainable Development Goal namely: Goal 13 Climate Action.
The requirements of the essay are:
Examine the significance of the Sustainable Development Goals as a whole with an emphasis on how accounting for the goals advances social, environmental and ethical development
Use a theoretical framework to critically evaluate the purpose and relevance of your chosen Goal from an ethical perspective
Describe the context, indicators and targets of your chosen Goal that seeks to promote ethical and sustainable progress
Provide an evidential based analysis with a specific focus on an organisation or country that demonstrates progress and future outlook of the Goal
Support your arguments with personal opinions and recommendations with a recognition of whether targets of the goals can be met
Use International Examples, Scholarly Articles, Case Studies, Academic Articles, News Magazines to support Arguments
Format of the Essay:
o Structure your essay with sub-headings and paragraphs (as described further below in the end of the doc), following the exact order of the requirements, adding a brief introduction and a conclusion.
o Add a table of contents for the essay
o Ideas and arguments should be laid out logically and coherently.
o References/sources should be properly cited in the text (Harvard style of citation recommended), with full bibliography section provided at the end of the essay.
o Add In Text Citations (Havard Style) where appropriate
o Bibliography should be listed according to alphabetical order of the surname of first author.
o Pay attention to format and overall readability
o Use Visual aid / Pictures / Timeline of SDGs throughout the paragraphs where it suits to support the arguments
o Consistent and clear font size throughout
o Line space 1 – depending on font
Note: Additional Links & resources on all the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to include in the Essay:
• The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2021
• The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2020
• SDG INDICATORS
• A GUIDE TO SDG INTERACTIONS: FROM SCIENCE TO IMPLEMENTATION
• https://dashboards.sdgindex.org/profiles
• https://sdg-tracker.org/
• https://sdgacademylibrary.mediaspace.kaltura.com/
ACC3145 SDG COURSEWORK Structure & Criteria
- Introduction (5%) Introduce scope of the coursework. Focus is on chosen SDG not all SDGs
Why do you think the chosen SDG is important?
Give a brief outline of the main sections and/or content of the essay - SDGs as a whole (10%) Provide a brief background and history on SDGs. Discussion should be generic
What issues led to the emergence of the SDGs
What are the objectives of the SDGs
How do the SDGs contribute to ethical (principles of human dignity, rights, justice, equality, fairness – see Unit 1) and sustainability (whether they are useful in the future Unit 2) perspectives
The state of SDG related disclosures by companies, organisations, consultancies governments and so on – all constitute accounting for SDGs and whether the disclosures (in whatever form) are needed
Some criticisms of the SDGs - Evaluation of chosen SDG (30%) What is the main issue of the Goal? e.g. for Goal 1, the main issue is poverty, so describe poverty and issues around the state of those experiencing poverty. Explain, from your perspective, why and how poverty is an important issue in global environment.
Present the Goal as a way of addressing the challenges from the issues raised above (all Goals have their issues poverty as an example above only applies to Goal 1)
Present facts on the Goal – what progress has been made on the goal overall?
The SDG report (available in UniHub) has latest details on all the goals
Critically discuss ethical and sustainability arguments specifically on the Goal. Use logical arguments to review the theoretical perspectives on the goal.
Guidance on critical evaluation is provided below
Specify the number of indicators and targets of the Goal, e.g. the goal has 2 targets and 3 indicators
Describe any 2 indicators/targets of the Goal
The 2 indicators will be used in evaluating evidence in the following section (section 4) - Evidence of SDG application (35%) Discuss any 2 evidence that demonstrates application of the Goal.
The evidence can be any country (e.g. Germany) or company (e.g. Tesco) or organisation (e.g. Oxfam) or project (e.g. a defined activity)
Each evidence must be given a brief background. If a company, a brief introduction and overview of the company is required. The same applies to a country. Context of the evidence should be adequately described
Analyse each evidence to specific detail. Mentions of achievements and outcomes are not enough, discuss processes (ideally from multiple reliable sources) of how the achievements were attained.
Link the performance of each evidence with the indicator/target as described in the previous section (section 3)
Ensure that each evidence is, at least, evaluated against one indicator/target
Critically discuss the evidence from a theoretical point of view using perspectives from ethical and/or sustainability arguments
See critical evaluation below
Present logical linkages between the Goal and other SDGs
How does progress, achievement, failure of the Goal affect and influence other SDGs? - Conclusion and recommendatio ns (15%) Present a summary of key findings and observations from the collective analysis undertaken
From the evidence presented, what is the direction of the Goal and indicator covered? Are the issues getting better or indications to suggest improvements?
Can the Goal be achieved by 2030?
Are key problems with the issue being addressed by the SDG?
Offer clear recommendations on the Goal and issue
Presentation and references (5%) Consistent in-text (in the body of write-up) and after text (in the bibliography section) references
Clean and logical structure
Critical thinking and evaluation
An inquisitive approach of using evidence and reasoning to form opinion. In the context of the coursework, apply the theories (ethical and sustainability arguments) on evidence used i.e. how has the evidence (company/ country/organisation) performed against theoretical arguments and assumptions.
Critical thinking is not about:
being negative questioning randomly nit picking
Critical thinking encourages:
Attitude of not accepting content at face value
Asking and answering constructively and systematically
Not accepting everything without rationale, justification and evidence Willingness to accept new evidence that emerge to shape understanding Continuous learning process
Critical writing emerges from critical thinking and should be presented with the following attributes:
A balanced account of pros and cons Assumptions and assertions are supported Clear account that scrutinises what’s been said
Expand ideas beyond mentions – fewer points that are explained well rather than presentation of numerous ideas
Backup argument with evidence and recognise limitations Avoid simple conclusion
Assessment marking criteria rubric – coursework
Section 1-4 5-8 9-12 13-16 17-20
Introduction Excellent introduction with clear specification of SDG of focus and scope that highlights all the main issues in the coursework. Very good introduction with clear specification of SDG of focus and scope that highlights the main issues in the coursework. Introduction specifies SDG of focus and scope that highlights some of the main issues in the coursework. Adequate introduction with specification of SDG of focus and scope that highlights some of the main issues in the
coursework. Absence of introduction or failure to meet introduction requirements.
5% 5 – 3.5 3.49 – 3 2.99 – 2.5 2.49 – 2 1.99 – 0
SDGs A thorough examination of the SDGs based on its history, justification, objectives with general theoretical insights, application and criticisms An examination of the SDGs based on most of its history, justification, objectives with general theoretical insights, application and criticisms Examination of the SDGs included its history, justification, objectives with general theoretical insights, application and
criticisms A review of the SDGs based on some of its history, justification, objectives with general theoretical insights, application and criticisms Limited review of the SDGs that lacked most of the required elements
10% 10 – 7 6.99 – 6 5.99 – 5 4.99 – 4 3.99 – 0
SDG evaluation Outstanding analysis of chosen SDG and relevant issues the goal was designed to address. Arguments brilliantly included a critical evaluation on progress of the goal with description of indicators/targets. A very well-expressed analysis of chosen SDG and relevant issues the goal was designed to address. Arguments included a critical evaluation on progress of the goal with description of indicators/targets. A good analysis of chosen SDG and/or relevant issues the goal was designed to address. Arguments considers critical evaluation on progress of the goal with description of
indicators/targets. Adequate analysis of chosen SDG and/or relevant issues the goal was designed to address. Some evaluation on progress of the goal with description of indicators/targets. Inadequate analysis of chosen SDG and/or relevant issues the goal was designed to address. Limited or absent evaluation and/or indicators.
30% 30 – 21 20.99 – 18 17.99 – 15 14.99 – 12 11.99 – 0
Evidence analysis Excellent description of required evidence with logical and critical
theoretical perspectives that A fantastic description of required evidence with logical and critical
theoretical perspectives A good description of required evidence with logical and critical
theoretical Limited description of required evidence with meagre critical
theoretical perspectives. Failure to adequately describe evidence
and/or theoretical
are linked to relevant indicators. Strong linkages established with other SDGs that are well linked to relevant indicators. Good Linkages established with other SDGs perspectives that are linked to relevant indicators. Linkages reasonably established
with other SDGs Some linkages to relevant indicators and/or consideration of other SDGs perspectives. Weak linkages to relevant indicators and/or consideration of
other SDGs
35% 35 – 24.5 24.44 – 21 20.99 – 17.5 17.49 – 14 13.99 – 0
Conclusion, recommendation, presentation and references Excellent summary of key findings that touches on practical and theoretical positions. Coherent recommendations. Effective, consistent and broad use of references. Brilliant presentation with very little errors. Very good summary of key findings that touches on practical and theoretical positions. Coherent recommendations.
Effective, and consistent use of references.
Confident presentation with little errors. Good summary of key findings that touches on practical and/or theoretical positions. Reasonable recommendations with consistent use of references. Clear presentation with
some errors. Adequate summary of key findings with little practical and theoretical positions. Good recommendations. Could improve references and/or presentation with errors. Limited or no summary of key findings and/or recommendations. Incomplete or no references. Can easily improve presentation.
20% 20 – 14 13.99 – 12 11.99 – 10 9.99 – 8 7.99 – 0
Determine the defense that was used for the crime.
Learning Goal: I’m working on a criminal justice exercise and need support to help me learn.This is the following link for this assignment… https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/slipopinion/…Select a criminal law case from the Opinions of the Court page of the U.S. Supreme Court website. Determine the defense that was used for the crime. Search the internet for types of legal defenses in criminal law.Write a 700- to 1,050-word defense as if you were supporting the attorney representing the client.Format your paper according to APA guidelines.
Requirements: 700 WORDS
Discuss whether you agree or disagree with that statement and provide specific reasons, facts, and real-world examples to support your ideas.
Learning Goal: I’m working on a education & teaching discussion question and need a sample draft to help me learn. Many have said that Universal Design for Learning (UDL) promotes better teaching practices for all educators. Discuss whether you agree or disagree with that statement and provide specific reasons, facts, and real-world examples to support your ideas.at least 150 words; apa format; at least two in-text citation with reference page
Requirements: 150+ | .doc file
How does a pulse oximeter differ from a traditional electrode for the determination of the ECG?
Learning Goal: I’m working on a health & medical question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn. How does a pulse oximeter differ from a traditional electrode for the determination of the ECG? Which is likely to have more diagnostic value, and why
Requirements: Upto the instructions
Briefly describe leadership in management and use resources from the internet.
Learning Goal: I’m working on a management writing question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.Briefly describe leadership in management and use resources from the internet. Use APA in referencing and please cite the resources. 300 words
Requirements: 300
Craft a 2,000-word well organized, researched and reasoned essay intended to persuade readers to adopt a specific policy on a topic you select.
Learning Goal: I’m working on a communications writing question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn. Craft a 2,000-word well organized, researched and reasoned essay intended to persuade readers to adopt a specific policy on a topic you select. Your policy proposal must be different from the status quo. In other words: don’t argue for something we’re already doing. Your mission is to convincingly persuade an audience to change the way they act or think about a particular issue. You’ll need to explain what the issue is (the national debt, immigration, foreign policy, etc.), why the current approach is unsuccessful and why your course of action is the best one available. Please provide us with relevant and credible evidence from 8-10 sources (cited in MLA or APA).TOPIC: U.S. National Debt
Requirements: 2000 word
prepare a financial analysis report which provides a critical evaluation for Amazon company using the most recent five years of annual reports/data available
You are required to prepare a financial analysis report which provides a critical evaluation for Amazon company using the most recent five years of annual reports/data available (FinSAS is attached). As part of the report, you should compare your company to the most recent annual report/data (2020) of an appropriate competitor company (eBay) in the same industry or the industry’s averages (if available).
how does Jeff Bezos fit into the model the authors of The Dark Side of Growth propose?
Learning Goal: I’m working on a management discussion question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.I need 3 paragraphs ( 5-6 sentences each paragraph) answer to the following discussion board question:In The Dark Side of Growth the authors look at growth as a roller coaster ride with periods of rapid growth interspersed with periods of failure. They suggest that successful CEOs are able to manage both the highs and the lows. As you read and analyze the Amazon case how does Jeff Bezos fit into the model the authors of The Dark Side of Growth propose?…I also need a 1 paragraph (5-6 sentences) response to the following post: Johns postIn the article “The Dark Side of Growth” the authors bring up many valid points about what CEO’s must be willing to accept when in their roles. It is easy and fun when times are going well. On the other hand the CEO must be innovative and forward thinking in order to successfully survive the down times that any growing company will endure. Jeff Bezos is a good example of the “roller coaster” leader of Amazon. Amazon has had many successful launches and also has had some large failures. What makes Jeff Bezos different from other CEOs is the fact that he shows management within Amazon and the shareholders that while one item may be a “flop” there are ten other projects behind it that could be winners. This allows others to not become discouraged and seek a new leader or new employment. This is similar to the business case we saw in the article where the CEO was asked to find his replacement but did so good and managing to turn things around the board kept him. Jeff Bezos is an innovator and is always forward thinking and that is important because when you are a growing business what will likely allow you to get past that period is innovation and resources. Jeff Bezos commits whatever resources are needed to a project and allows people to make mistakes as that is how the company has come back stronger after each successful and unsuccessful product launch.
Requirements: explained above
