Boyd does not begin with her own assessment of Wikipedia. Instead, she starts out with its general reputation and only gradually leads up to her own judgment, stating it most fully in her ending paragraph. What are the advantages of this strategy? What might be the disadvantages? Was it a good choice for this topic? Why or why not?

Boyd does not begin with her own assessment of Wikipedia. Instead, she starts out with its general reputation and only gradually leads up to her own judgment, stating it most fully in her ending paragraph. What are the advantages of this strategy? What might be the disadvantages? Was it a good choice for this topic? Why or why not?