You have taken the NEO-FFM personality test as part of your first assignment in this class. The personality test is a rough measure of your standing on the five personality traits of the Five Factor Model (“Big Five”) discussed in class and in your textbook. These factors are: Surgency, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Emotional Stability, and Intellect-Openness (Culture). For this assignment, you are going to apply what you have learned about personality to yourself or to someone close to you. Using the measure previously discussed, discuss your standing or the standing of someone close to you on the five factors. What are your/their scores and what does your/their score on each factor imply about your/their personality? How does your/their standing on each of the five traits explain some of your/their behavior? Choices in life? Provide specific examples.

 
You have taken the NEO-FFM personality test as part of your first assignment in this class. The personality test is a rough measure of your standing on the five personality traits of the Five Factor Model (“Big Five”) discussed in class and in your textbook. These factors are: Surgency, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Emotional Stability, and Intellect-Openness (Culture).
For this assignment, you are going to apply what you have learned about personality to yourself or to someone close to you. Using the measure previously discussed, discuss your standing or the standing of someone close to you on the five factors.
What are your/their scores and what does your/their score on each factor imply about your/their personality?
How does your/their standing on each of the five traits explain some of your/their behavior? Choices in life? Provide specific examples.
Also, discuss what influence your/their standing on EACH trait might have in EACH of the five areas listed below. Be sure to discuss each of the five traits in each of the five areas listed and provide specific examples to illustrate your points.
Academic functioning
Social functioning (including functioning in intimate relationships)
Occupational functioning
Health
Risk-taking
Your homework should be a minimum of 5 pages double-spaced and a maximum of 10 pages. There is no need to use references other than your textbook and class notes.
This assignment is designed to allow you to apply what you have learned to the real world of personality and to see how it operates in your life or in the life of someone close to you. You should use some factual information from your book, but remember, this is a critical thinking assignment, so include your thoughts, ideas, and hypotheses whether or not there is scientific data to support them.  There is no need to use references unless you use something other than the book or class notes. It is also acceptable, and advisable to use first person pronouns in your homework. Have fun with this. If you make an effort, you will do well on this assignment.

 List, define, give symptoms, and treatments for 5 common STDs

 Please complete attachment
1. List, define, give symptoms, and treatments for 5 common STD’s in the chart below.
2. Can a Sexually Transmitted Disease (STD) be transmitted during Oral Sex?
3. List three ways to prevent the transmission of an STD.
4 What steps should you take if you find out you have an STD?
5 Can any of the STD’s cause other chronic conditions? List three.

Write a well-developed esay discussing how a bi-partisan consensus was created over Everglade?s restoration that please both pro-growth and environmentalists.

Write a well-developed esay discussing how a bi-partisan consensus was created over Everglade?s restoration that please both pro-growth and environmentalists.
Write a well-developed esay discussing why Michael Grunwald argued that the Everglades must be restored.
Write a well-developed esay discussing what Michael Grunwald means when he talks about the conquest of the Everglades.
Write a well-developed esay discussing why Senator Marco Rubio is more optimistic than Michael Grunwald about Everglades restoration.

Andrew wants to eat healthier and went online to learn about MyPlate. He came away overwhelmed at all the information and was turned off by reading about ounces and cups-concepts that are unfamiliar to him. He is clearly interested in changing his food habits but is stuck on the idea that that isn’t possible unless he weighs and measures his food. He is wondering if eating healthier is worth the trouble. How would you encourage him to approach the goal of eating healthier? What information would you gather about his usual intake? His willingness to change? How would you use MyPlate to help him make better choices without overwhelming him?

Forum Instructions
Each student must post (1) substantial initial post with a minimum of 250 words.
All posts and replies must contain at least (2) professional references, one may be the course textbook, properly cited in the current APA format.
The .com websites acceptable as scholarly. The initial post needs citations and references.
Discussion Topic
Andrew wants to eat healthier and went online to learn about MyPlate. He came away overwhelmed at all the information and was turned off by reading about ounces and cups-concepts that are unfamiliar to him. He is clearly interested in changing his food habits but is stuck on the idea that that isn’t possible unless he weighs and measures his food. He is wondering if eating healthier is worth the trouble.
How would you encourage him to approach the goal of eating healthier? What information would you gather about his usual intake? His willingness to change?
How would you use MyPlate to help him make better choices without overwhelming him?
Andrew’s wife thinks he is not consuming enough vitamin C. Andrew is worried that he will develop scurvy. Can you assume that he is at risk for scurvy if he isn’t consuming the RDA for vitamin C?
Why may his wife’s assessment be inaccurate? How can you determine if Andrew isn’t consuming enough vitamin C? What would you tell Andrew to calm his fears?

What are the key differences between relationship and task conflict? Why is task conflict more productive in groups than relationship conflict, and what are some of the ways to turn relationship conflict into task conflict for the greater good of the group?

What are the key differences between relationship and task conflict? Why is task conflict more productive in groups than relationship conflict, and what are some of the ways to turn relationship conflict into task conflict for the greater good of the group?
What are some of the arguments for the ineffectiveness of group brainstorming? What can be done to restructure the design of brainstorming groups to increase productivity and improve performance? 

Write an essay in which you answer the following question: What should we do about the problem of disinformation?

ESSAY#3 ASSIGNMENT: Write an essay in which you answer the following question:
What should we do about the problem of disinformation?
Some points to keep in mind as you begin planning this essay:
The most important point to keep in mind when coming up with your thesis is to be focused. Of the three prompts you’ve had for essays in this class, this one is the most open ended. You are free to come up with ANY idea that you think would be a good idea. But you are NOT expected to address every aspect of this particular issue. You are expected to come up with a single, concrete proposal (claim of policy) that we could do and to argue why this would be a good idea. As always, make sure your thesis statement answers the question: what should we DO about the problem of disinformation?
Your thesis will be a claim of policy describing some particular action we should take about this particular problem.
Your proposal can be stated as a positive action — for example, “We should make is much easier for people or groups to sue organizations or individuals for knowingly promoting disinformation.” Or you can state your idea in a negative way — for example, “We should not attempt to regulate social media for disinformation.” Your thesis might even be: “We shouldn’t try to do anything about disinformation.”
Make sure you argue why your particular proposal is a good idea, what benefits your specific proposal will bring about, or why doing something you don’t think we should do will only make the problem worse. Don’t just argue why disinformation in general is a bad thing. Your proposal/thesis is that we DO something in particular, so make sure you have good reasons and evidence that this proposal will be a good idea. In other words, explain what your proposal would change and why this change would be a good idea. If your thesis is that we shouldn’t do something, then explain what would happen if we did do that and what bad things would happen if we did.
Also, focus on WHY your proposal would be a good idea; don’t spend too much time explaining HOW to do it. Keep the discussion about HOW to do it contained in the intro paragraph.
This topic — like all good arguments — will require some EVIDENCE, evidence that your idea will be a good thing, that it will bring about a positive change or block a negative change. Keep in mind that because this topic is somewhat political, there are a lot of sources out there (on both sides) that should not be trusted. It will be very important that you be skeptical about any information on this topic and be especially careful about using only credible and objective sources. There is A LOT of misinformation and disinformation out there on this issue — ironic, isn’t it.
As with essay #2, for this essay, you will need a minimum of three credible outside sources, and one of those must be a source that essentially disagrees with your position or offers an opposing view on the issue. You must bring up and then counter-argue at least one significant point that contradicts or challenges your thesis.
Also, as with essay #2, there will be an annotated bibliography due along with the essay.

Discuss the differences between the three major approaches surrounding collection and analysis of data, i,e., quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods.

Discuss the differences between the three major approaches surrounding collection and analysis of data, i,e., quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. As well as, describe the design of scientific inquiry that may go with each method i.e., survey, narrative, phenomenological, ethnographic, grounded theory, or case study and why it would be selected. Then address which method and design you think you would prefer to use to conduct research and why.

Expound on Entwistle’s coverage of professional ethics, workplace environment and informed consent, and religiously based interventions. Why is it important to understand professional boundaries regarding integration?

· Covers the 
Textbook material from 
Module 5: Week 5 – Module 8: Week 8. 

· Contains 
8 short answer and
 2 essay questions.

· The 2 essay questions do not have a specific word count but these will allow you to gain points on previous papers that lacked appropriate APA Format
· Is 
limited to
 2 
hours and 30 minutes.

·
Allows 
1 attempt. 

· Is 
worth 150 points.

Question 112.5 pts

What is the focus or vision for the Transformational View? Explain.

 
Flag question: Question 2

Question 212.5 pts

Provide a brief overview of PSYCH-1 through PSYCH-6 of the Biblical Counseling View.

 
 
Flag question: Question 3

Question 312.5 pts

Of Johnson’s five views, choose 2, and provide the critiques of each.

 
Flag question: Question 4

Question 412.5 pts

What is the goal of the Integration View? Explain.

 
Flag question: Question 5

Question 512.5 pts

According to the Christian Psychology View, what is the foundational commitment of Jesus’s psychology? Expound upon this.

 
Flag question: Question 6

Question 612.5 pts

Describe Christian Neutrality and Psychological Neutrality.

 
Flag question: Question 7

Question 712.5 pts

Entwistle offers what critique of the Neutral Parties model?

 
Flag question: Question 8

Question 812.5 pts

Which models of Johnson and Entwistle are similar and why/how? Pick 3 pairs. (e.g. Levels of Explanation and Neutral Parties).

 
Flag question: Question 9

Question 925 pts

In chapter 7 of the Johnson (2010) text he discusses wisdom. Expound upon our limited ability to comprehend God’s truths, how “the quest for wisdom glorifies God” (p. 294), and practical ways to gain understanding.

 

Flag question: Question 10

Question 1025 pts

Expound on Entwistle’s coverage of professional ethics, workplace environment and informed consent, and religiously based interventions. Why is it important to understand professional boundaries regarding integration?

Explain your patient encounter, highlighting the challenges the situation presented, and briefly summarize the contents of your journal article. What strategies did you employ to help handle the situation? What other strategies could you have used?

 

Explain your patient encounter, highlighting the challenges the situation presented, and briefly summarize the contents of your journal article.
What strategies did you employ to help handle the situation? What other strategies could you have used?
How did you advocate for the patient in the situation?
What are some of the legal and ethical implications that need to be considered when providing care for patients with depression resulting from illnesses or injuries or suspicious illnesses or injuries?

identify a bill introduced in Congress (House or Senate) during the most recent session and analyze the pros and cons of the legislation. State and explain your position, provide policy recommendations, and identify their impact on the Hispanic community.

r less, identify a bill introduced in Congress (House or Senate) during the most recent session and analyze the pros and cons of the legislation. State and explain your position, provide policy recommendations, and identify their impact on the Hispanic community. Follow MLA format, and cite your sources. We strongly recommend writing your analysis on one of the following topics:

Environment 
Economy
Technology

× How can I help you?