The infographic purpose | English homework help

 PART 1: THE INFOGRAPHICPurpose: Create a technical document that defines a term or concept and extends it, using specific strategies. Subject / Topic: For this project, students will create a definition of a term that encourages others to submit to Art Helps Hearts. The term or concept should be encouraging to those that are unwell. Genre: The extended definition should be an infographic. Intended Audience: The extended definition should be directed toward the specific audience. Tone, language, and style should be appropriate for that audience. Ethical, cultural, and legal differences of the audience should be considered and addressed. Content Requirements: The extended definition should include a sentence-level definition of the term or concept and at least 3 levels or extensions. These extensions or levels could be created using a number of definition strategies, including partition, principles of operation, examples, comparison/contrast, negation, analogy, and etymology. Design Requirements: The extended definition should include at least 1 design element, including graphics or photographs. Source Requirements: 2-4 outside sources Citation: APA Length Requirements: At least 1 full-pagePART 2: THE EMAIL (Professional Correspondence)Purpose: To reflect on and justify the rhetorical choices made in the extended definitionTopic/Subject: The piece of correspondence should identify the purpose and audience for the extended definition. It should then justify the rhetorical choices made, explaining why they work, given the purpose and audience.Genre: Professional emailIntended Audience: The Art Helps Heart administration Length Requirements: At least 1 full-pageView Rubric 

Ethics 5 | English homework help

Discussion post 1
Though it hasnt always been the case, there is now a well-recognized right of patients to refuse medical treatment. This includes treatments that the patient thinks are too risky, but also treatments they oppose for any other reason they might have. It includes also the right to stop treatment, because patients must feel free to withdraw existing treatments or else they might refrain from starting a treatment in the first place for fear that they wont be allowed to change their mind later.
A major issue for us, as we consider healthcare in end-of-life situations, is whether we should see euthanasia and assisted suicide as ethically comparable to respecting patient wishes to stop/refuse treatment even when doing so means theylll die when they could have lived by continuing treatment.
So the question is: are passive euthanasia (letting a patient die when they request to stop treatment) and active euthanasia (taking steps to kill a patient when they request it) ethically the same? The conventional doctrine on this question is No, they are ethically different. But James Rachels and other ethicists challenge this. What do you think?

reading questions
answer questions based on articles below and attachments
What does James Rachels identify as conventional wisdom (or the standard view) of the ethics of passive and active euthanasia? Does Rachels himself agree with this?
2. What sort of moral lesson is Rachels trying to draw from his hypothetical Smith-Jones scenario? 
3. Why might someone see withdrawing treatment as ethically different from withholding treatment? Why might someone see withdrawing and withholding treatment as ethically equivalent?
4. Which of the principles of bioethics would you say is most central to Dax Cowarts position on the right to refuse treatment? Briefly explain.
5. Identify the eligibility requirements for physician assisted suicide under the Death with Dignity Act.
6. Do you have any ethical criticisms or concerns about the Death with Dignity Act? Would you vote to adopt it as the law in Illinois why or why not?
articles ::https://deathwithdignity.org/resources/faqs/
https://www.vanityfair.com/magazine/1991/05/jack-kevorkian199105
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC300789/

Unit 7 db: multifaceted performers

 Consider the importance of MTV in the careers of so many musicians who rose to fame in the 1980s. For this discussion, choose either Michael Jackson or Madonna, both of whom were considered multifaceted performers who rise to stardom was the direct result of MTV. Use the mashup tool to post one of their videos and respond to the following:

Do you think that the importance of the visual medium, in this case, MTV, was a positive or negative development in the music industry?
Were there any controversies associated with the video you chose? If so, what were they?
Do you think that music videos help encourage performing artists to be more multifaceted? Or do you think that it detracts from the quality of the music by placing so much emphasis on non-musical elements? 

In response to at least three of your peers, do you agree or disagree with your peers’ evaluation of the musician and music video chosen? Explain why or why not. When sharing your musical selections with the class, you may use the mashup tool for YouTube. If you are uncomfortable with that or would like to post a traditional text response, that is acceptable as well. Below are the Mashup direction should you choose to use that option. Using Mashup is NOT mandatory.

Solutions for paying college athletes | spmt379 |

8-10 pages APA format, Double Spaced, on Solutions for Paying College Athletes.

please address each of the following four discussion items in separate labeled paragraphs:

Please provide a historical summary of your topic as related to sport
What are the sociological aspects of your topic?
From a philosophical perspective, what are the general problems associated with your topic area, and what solutions do you recommend?
Finally, politics is something that permeates just about every aspect of our society. Therefore, please share the political aspects related to your topic area.
Summary of findings, critical reflection on the research 

Use at least five references 

Annotated bibliography on management | Management homework help

 ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONSOVERVIEWIn preparation for writing each of your Discussions, you should submit your AnnotatedBibliography Assignment on the topic that is being covered for the week (Marketing,Accounting, Finance, Management, Economic Data Analysis, International Business).INSTRUCTIONSAn annotated bibliography is a list of sources (books, journals, Web sites, periodicals, etc.) onehas used for researching a topic (Annotated Bibliographies, 2020).For all sources used in your Discussion you should:? Provide an APA formatted Citation (this should look like what you would include in anormal reference section.? Summarize the source and discuss the research study that was conducted and what thefindings were.? Assess the source and discuss how useful it is and how it compares with other sources inyour paper.? Reflect on how the source will be useful to you in your discussion. How does it help toshape your argument and how are you using it to shape your writing?Each annotation should look like:Author (year). Title of article. Title of Journal, Vol no(issue). Pg to pg.In your summary, you will begin with a discussion of the research question the study isattempting to answer. You will summarize the research that was conducted and the specificfindings that were uncovered. You will then provide a summary of what this means for the topic.Next, you will discuss how the source compares with other sources in your paper and how usefulis the source in attributing to your writing.Finally, you will discuss how the source is useful in your discussion. You will need to be specificon why it is important to use and exactly how you will use it in your writing to shape yourarguments.*Do not use “I” in any of the annotations.Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool 

UC Biology the Digestion of A Starchy Meal Question

I’m working on a biology question and need a sample draft to help me learn. Describe the digestion of a starchy meal along the human alimentary canal.

Overview in this module, you have learned about the benefits,

 
Overview
In this module, you have learned about the benefits, drawbacks, and overall value of using the triple bottom line (TBL) in business. In this assignment, you will take a closer look at how strategies for incorporating this framework are similar and different across the manufacturing industry and the service industry.
Prompt
Imagine you are a sustainability consultant, and you’ve been asked to create a simple handout that clarifies the similarities and differences between strategies used to incorporate the TBL into the manufacturing industry and the service industry. The handout will be provided to individuals at large and small group trainings.
Specifically, you must address the following rubric criteria:

Similarities: Explain the similarities that exist between incorporating the TBL framework into both the service industry and the manufacturing industry, and why.
Differences: Explain the differences that exist between incorporating the TBL framework into the service industry and the manufacturing industry, and why.
Example Strategies: Provide an example of a strategy that is appropriate to use across both the service and the manufacturing industries, and provide an example that is specific to either the service or the manufacturing industry when considering people, planet, or profit through the TBL framework. Include a brief explanation of what each example demonstrates.

Guidelines for Submission
Submit this assignment as a 350- to 500-word Word document. Use the course resource or external resources to support your comparisons. Sources should be cited according to APA style.

hormone replacement therapy (hrt) | anatomy

 
Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT) is most commonly known for treating the discomfort associated with menopause. However, more broadly, HRT is any form of hormone therapy that involves a patient receiving hormones to supplement or replace naturally occurring hormones in the body. For this discussion post, research different forms of HRT and choose one type to focus on.
Initial post: In your original post, describe a patient who may benefit from HRT. Explain the risks and benefits to using HRT in the scenario you chose. Be sure to include information on safety.

ACCTG 334 SDSU Prepare a Statement of Cash Flows Using Indirect Method Questions

I’m working on a accounting discussion question and need the explanation and answer to help me learn. Azteca Corp Co. is a manufacturer and distributer of precision navigation and guidance equipment. The following is information about the company’s earnings and securities on 31 December 2024.(Note: round all per share values to three decimal places)Earnings and SharesNet income1,500,000Average market price of common stock30Tax rate22%Number of common shares outstanding ($1 par) at 1-Jan-2024300,000Number of 3% non-cumulative preferred shares outstanding ($50 par) at year-end55,000Each share of preferred shares is convertible into 2 shares of common stockTotal Dividends Paid during 2024166,500Additional Information on Stock TransactionsOn April 1, 2024, Azteca Corp repurchased 27 thousand previously issued shares.On September 1, Azteca Corp sold and issued an additional 17.5 thousand shares of common stock at $30.Shares Issuable perBondsFace/Carrying ValueInt Rate$1,000 BondSeries A Convertible750,0005%10Series B Convertible650,0004%10Options and WarrantsOptionsWarrantsNumber of shares issuable15,00012,000Exercise price3226During the December 31, 2023 Financial Statement Audit, the company conducted a thorough internal audit, during which the following facts were discovered. The audit occurred before any adjusting entries or closing entries are prepared. (Assume the 2022 books are closed)1.The Company purchased a machine for $250,000 on January 1, 2020. Lundholm depreciates machines of this type by the straight-line method over a 8-year period using no salvage value. Due to a change in sales patterns, on January 1, 2023, management determines the useful life of the machine to be a total of 10 years, and has a salvage value of $10,000. What amount should Lundholm record for depreciation expense for 2023?2.The Company purchased machinery on July 1, 2023. The machinery was valued at $3,000,000, with a $250,000 down and the Company agreed to pay the balance in 6 equal installments ($541,798), payable each June 30. The company has a borrowing rate of 5%. There is no salvage value, and the useful life is 10 years.The following journal entries were recorded:1-Jul-23DRPPE – Machinery$3,000,000CRNote Payable$3,000,000DRRepairs and maintenance$250,000CRCash$250,0003.Two years earlier, The Company recorded a 6% stock dividend (4,000 common shares, $1 par) as follows:DRRetained earnings$4,000CRCommon stock$4,000The shares had a market price at the time of $16 per share.4.A 10-year bonds were issued on September 1, 2022. The face value of the bonds totaled $120,000 with a stated rate of 9%. The market rate was 7% when the bonds were issued. Interest is paid annually on August 30 of each year. The following journal entry was recorded when the bonds were issued, and the interest paid:9/1/2022Bond IssuanceDRCash$136,857CRGain on Bonds Payable$16,857CRBonds Payable$120,0009/1/2023DRInterest Expense$10,800CRCash$10,8003. PQR IndustriesComparative Balance Sheets December 31, 2024 and 202320242023Assets:Cash $ 2,433,000 $ 1,310,000Accounts receivable 2,084,229 1,350,000Inventory 2,700,000 1,575,000Land 1,675,000 1,800,000Building 2,700,000 2,700,000 Less: Accumulated depreciation (900,000) (810,000)Equipment 8,550,000 6,750,000 Less: Accumulated depreciation (1,575,000) (1,440,000)Patent 3,600,000 4,500,000 $ 21,267,229 $ 17,735,000Liabilities:Accounts payable $ 1,900,000 $ 1,350,000Accrued expenses payable 900,000 675,000Interest Payable 3,000 – Dividends Payable 25,000 35,000Notes Payable 125,000 150,000Bond Payable (net) 261,073 – Shareholders’ Equity:Common stock 9,456,667 9,000,000Paid-in capital–excess of par 2,253,333 2,025,000Retained earnings 6,343,156 4,500,000 $ 21,267,229 $ 17,735,000Additional information from the accounting records:a. During 2024, equipment with a cost of $875,000 (45% depreciated) was sold for $350,000.b. The Statement of Shareholders’ Equity reveals reductions of $685,000 and $445,000 for stock dividends and cash dividends, respectively.c. Net income for the year was $2,973,156.d. Land was sold for $90,000.e. On May 1, 2024, the company issued 10 year, $300,000.00, 6% bonds at a market rate of 8%. The issuing price of the bond was $259,229.02. Interest on the bonds is paid semi-annually on Oct 31 and April 30 of each year.Using this financial statement data, prepare a complete statement of cash flows, using the INDIRECT method.

Macqueen assessment 6 | Psychology homework help

OVERVIEW
 
Write a 5–7-page assessment in which you examine the controversy related to research and ethics in the field of social psychology.
It is essential to be able to critically analyze the research methods used in studies, in order to weigh the validity of the conclusions or recommendations.
SHOW LESS
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:
•   Competency 1: Apply information literacy and research skills to locate scholarly information in the field of social psychology.
•                     Use valid, scholarly research resources relevant to the field of social psychology.
•   Competency 4: Examine the research methods frequently used in the study of social psychology.
•                     Describe the impact of controversial research studies on the human participants.
•   Competency 5: Examine controversial research studies in social psychology from an ethical standpoint.
•                     Explain how controversial research studies contributed to the development of ethical standards in the field of psychology.
•                     Develop evidence-based arguments for and against controversial research studies in the field of social psychology.
•                     Describe what controversial research studies revealed about conformity and obedience to authority.
•   Competency 6: Apply critical thinking skills to resolve conflicts and issues in the field of social psychology.
•                     Determine whether knowledge gained justifies controversial research studies in the field of social psychology.
•   Competency 7: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for professionals in the field of psychology.
•                     Write coherently to support a central idea with correct grammar, usage, and mechanics as expected of a psychology professional.
Use APA format and style.
 
CONTEXT
Is conformity good or bad? Are people willing to hurt one another just because an authority told them to? Some of the most fascinating research results about human behavior were intending to answer these very questions. The results on the topics of social conformity and obedience to authority revealed some disturbing revelations about human behavior and about potential harm to participants in research. The studies and their results had tremendous implications for the field on how we conduct research—and on how we understand the influence of social pressure and leadership. Because of the significant implications in both research and application, these studies have been some of the most controversial and hotly debated topics in psychology.
 
QUESTIONS TO CONSIDER
 
To deepen your understanding, you are encouraged to consider the questions below and discuss them with a fellow learner, a work associate, an interested friend, or a member of the business community.
•   Is deception always necessary when conducting research in social psychology with human participants?
Do the insights gained from research justify deceiving people?
 
RESOURCES
Suggested Resources
The following optional resources are provided to support you in completing the assessment or to provide a helpful context. For additional resources, refer to the Research Resources and Supplemental Resources in the left navigation menu of your courseroom.
Library Resources
The following e-books or articles from the Capella University Library are linked directly in this course. Note: Some of the articles listed are fairly old and are included here because they are considered seminal works in the field.
•   Bandura, A., Ross, D., Ross, S. A. (1961). Transmission of aggression through imitation of aggressive models. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63(3), 575–582.
•   Bandura, A., Ross, D., Ross, S. A. (1963). Imitation of film-mediated aggressive models. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66(1), 3–11.
•   Becker-Blease, K. A., Freyd, J. J. (2006). Research participants telling the truth about their lives: The ethics of asking and not asking about abuse. American Psychologist, 61(3), 218–226.
•   Benham, B. (2008). The ubiquity of deception and the ethics of deceptive research. Bioethics, 22(3), 147–156.
•   Boynton, M. H., Portnoy, D. B., Johnson, B. T. (2013). Exploring the ethics and psychological impact of deception in psychological research. IRB: Ethics Human Research, 35(2), 7–13.Crano, W. D. (2000). Milestones in the psychological analysis of social influence. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 4(1), 68–80.
•   Buckle, J. L., Dwyer, S. C., Jackson, M. (2010). Qualitative bereavement research: Incongruity between the perspectives of participants and research ethics boards. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 13(2), 111–125.
•   Guadagno, R. E., Muscanell, N. L., Rice, L. M., Roberts, N. (2013). Social influence online: The impact of social validation and likability on compliance. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 2(1), 51–60.
•   Haney, C., Zimbardo, P. (1998). The past and future of U.S. prison policy: Twenty-five years after the Stanford Prison Experiment. American Psychologist, 53(7), 709–727.
•   Heerdink, M. W., van Kleef, G. A., Homan, A. C., Fischer, A. H. (2013). On the social influence of emotions in groups: Interpersonal effects of anger and happiness on conformity versus deviance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(2), 262–284.
•   Horcajo, J., Petty, R. E., Briñol, P. (2010). The effects of majority versus minority source status on persuasion: A self-validation analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(3), 498–512.
•   Juritzen, T. I., Grimen, H., Heggen, K. (2011). Protecting vulnerable research participants: A Foucault-inspired analysis of ethics committees. Nursing Ethics, 18(5), 640–650.
•   McDonald, K. E., Kidney, C. A., Patka, M. (2013). You need to let your voice be heard: Research participants views on research. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 57(3), 216–225.
•   Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(4), 371–378.
•   Milgram, S. (1964). Group pressure and action against a person. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 69(2), 137–143.
•   Milgram, S. (1965). Liberating effects of group pressure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1(2), 127–134.
•   Pascual-Leone, A., Singh, T., Scoboria, A. (2010). Using deception ethically: Practical research guidelines for researchers and reviewers. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 51(4), 241–248.
•   Zimbardo, P. G. (1974). On obedience to authority. American Psychologist, 29(7), 566–567.
•   Voisin, D., Fointiat, V. (2013). Reduction in cognitive dissonance according to normative standards in the induced compliance paradigm. Social Psychology, 44(3), 191–195.
•   Wilson, C. M., Christensen, B. K. (2012). Ethical issues relevant to the assessment of suicide risk in nonclinical research settings. Crisis, 33(1), 54–59.
 
 
ASSESSMENT INSTRUCTIONS
 
To prepare for this assessment, locate scholarly articles on Milgrams studies on obedience to authority and Zimbardos Stanford Prison experiment on the power of social roles. These two pivotal studies provide the basis for this assessment.
Examine the controversy related to research and ethics in the field of social psychology. Consider the information you located on Milgrams studies on obedience to authority and Zimbardos Stanford Prison experiment on the power of social roles. Include the following in your assessment:
•   Describe what these studies revealed about conformity and obedience to authority.
•   Explain the benefits from these research studies. What knowledge or insight was gained?
•   Describe the impact of the studies in terms of the effects on the human participants.
•   Explain how these (and other) controversial research studies have shaped the principles and standards in the current APA Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Ethics.
•   Develop evidence-based arguments both for and against these types of controversial research studies.
•   Do you think that the information that was obtained was worth the risks to the human subjects? Explain and support your position.
Your submitted assessment should be 5–7 pages in length, excluding title page and reference page, and use references from at least three scholarly resources. Be sure to follow APA guidelines for format and style.
Additional Requirements
•   Include a title page and reference page.
•   At least three current scholarly or professional resources.
•   APA format.
•   Times New Roman font, 12 point.
•   Double spaced.