Empowering Growth Mindset in Education Discussion

Growth MindsetRead Carol Dweck’s article, “Revisiting the Growth Mindset (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.” and summarize what it is means to have a growth mindset and how is it different than a fixed mindset.  Consider the triggers identified in the article and elaborate on any of them that may be alive in you.  Defend your thoughts about how and why it is important for educators to have a “Growth Mindset.”Guided Response: Consider and respond to the thoughts about the Growth Mindset shared in at least two of your classmates’ posts. Provide your reaction to their thoughts by sharing your agreement, disagreement or suggestions to further their foundation. In addition to your two classmate responses, be sure to respond to any questions or comments posted by your instructor.You can use the Writing a Good Discussion Board Post (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. document to help create your responses.Week 4 – Discussion 2( 300 words)Week 4 – Discussion 21 1 unread reply. 1 1 reply. Your initial discussion thread is due on Day 3 (Thursday) and you have until Day 7 (Monday) to respond to your classmates. Your grade will reflect both the quality of your initial post and the depth of your responses. Refer to the Discussion Forum Grading Rubric under the Settings icon above for guidance on how your discussion will be evaluated.  Do You Believe in Me?View Dalton Sherman’s famous keynote speech, “Do You Believe in Me? (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.”  At the time of this speech in 2008, Dalton was a 10 year old entering into the fifth (5th) grade.  He address over 17,000 educators from the Dallas Texas area, challenging them to believe in him and his classmates.Then view the same young man seven (7) years later as he addresses educators at the Extra Yard for Teacher summit in 2015 with his “Don’t Lose Your Joy (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.” speech.After viewing the “Do You Believe in Me? (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.”, and the “Extra Yard for Teachers Summit 2015 (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.”, based on the “Six Pillars of Character”,  consider the target career option in education you researched in week three, and what you know about the importance of mindset in both the student and the educator.  Craft a discussion response that explains three specific ways you will show your students that you believe in them as you create your own classroom culture and climate.

Annotated bibliography on economic data

 OVERVIEWIn preparation for writing each of your Discussions, you should submit your AnnotatedBibliography Assignment on the topic that is being covered for the week (Marketing,Accounting, Finance, Management, Economic Data Analysis, International Business).INSTRUCTIONSAn annotated bibliography is a list of sources (books, journals, Web sites, periodicals, etc.) onehas used for researching a topic (Annotated Bibliographies, 2020).For all sources used in your Discussion you should:
? Provide an APA formatted Citation (this should look like what you would include in anormal reference section.
? Summarize the source and discuss the research study that was conducted and what thefindings were.
? Assess the source and discuss how useful it is and how it compares with other sources inyour paper.
? Reflect on how the source will be useful to you in your discussion. How does it help toshape your argument and how are you using it to shape your writing?Each annotation should look like:
Author (year). Title of article. Title of Journal, Vol no(issue). Pg to pg.In your summary, you will begin with a discussion of the research question the study isattempting to answer. You will summarize the research that was conducted and the specificfindings that were uncovered. You will then provide a summary of what this means for the topic.Next, you will discuss how the source compares with other sources in your paper and how usefulis the source in attributing to your writing.Finally, you will discuss how the source is useful in your discussion. You will need to be specificon why it is important to use and exactly how you will use it in your writing to shape yourarguments.*Do not use “I” in any of the annotations.Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

a competitive proposal | Management homework help

Students can now bid for a share of up to £60 million in grant funding as part of the Commercial Management taught unit calendar. Our technology is Organic Rankine Cycle?ORC). The project is aimed at Babaoshan funeral home.
To support the final submission of the assignment, students are required to produce a competitive proposal that satisfies the following criterion:
1.Outline a decarbonisation plan/initiative across the business value chain (15 %) [200- 400 words] 
-Describe or explain the extent to which any of the study would have still occurred without IETF funding (e.g. would it not have gone ahead at all, or would it still have gone ahead but at a smaller scale?)
-Describe or explain why some or none of the study would have gone ahead without public funding 
-Describe or explain why you are not able to wholly fund the study from your own resources or other forms of private-sector funding (such as loans)
In this section you will be asked what would have happened without IETF money. This section seeks justification for the use of public money to support the study. You will be scored based on the strength of that justification. 
Higher marks will be awarded to applications where there is a compelling case for why public funding is required and the positive difference this funding will make to the supply chain.
Higher scoring proposals will describe alternative sources of support with an explanation of why they are discounted or used in conjunction with the grant funding. It is likely that a very high proportion of the study would not have gone ahead without IETF support.
2. Identify one strength and one vulnerability of your project’s sustainability efforts. Justify your  choice (10 %) [200- 400 words]
-Describe or explain how the study could be replicated by others in the sector
-Describe or explain how the technology could be adopted in other sectors 
-Describe or explain any measures you intend to take to encourage the project to be replicated outside your organisation. 
-Describe or explain how the results of the study will be disseminated to others
 In this section you will be asked to describe the extent to which the technology to be explored though this study could be adopted by others in the sector or wider sectors. 
This section seeks to understand how the project fits into the broader industrial decarbonisation agenda. A technology that is repeatable and scalable across different industries and locations will have more value for industry. It will be scored based on the description of how this project could be repeated. 
Higher marks will be given where a clear and strong argument is given for replicability with good consideration of other sectors and how learnings from this project will be disseminated. The argument is justified with supporting evidence.

Brief | HRMT602 | American Military University

For this assignment, you will use everything you learned about the issue you chose in the Week 3 Assignment, and additional research, to demonstrate your thorough knowledge of your issue.
Suppose that the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) has decided to grant review of a case deciding the fate of the issue that you chose (in the Week 3 Assignment), and they’ve called upon you as a subject matter expert to provide a comprehensive opinion on the matter. Write a formal case-brief style paper that addresses the following components:
1. What is the history of this issue in terms of the ways that American businesses have operated?
2. What is the legislative history, if any?
3. What is the current legal authority (statutes and/or case law) on the issue and what does it require of businesses?
4. What are the different arguments on each side of the issue?
5. Which arguments (if any) are stronger and why?
6. What would be your recommendation to SCOTUS in terms of a ruling on this issue, and why?
7. Are there any exceptions to your recommendation? For example, are there any employers or employees to which the ruling should not apply? Or industries that should be exempt? Why?
8. What is the anticipated future of this issue? Should SCOTUS expect to have to review it again in the future? Or does your recommendation settle the issue permanently?

Wk 1 – apply: process improvement flowchart | OPS/574

The purpose of this assignment is to learn how to create a flowchart and improve a process and summarize the results. You will create flowcharts of a process.
NOTE: The process you use for this week 1 assignment will be used again in the week 2 assignment.
Complete the Week 1 Process Improvement Flowchart Worksheet. Respond to all prompts found on the worksheet.
Create two (2) flowcharts, 1. Current Process (as is) and 2. Improved Process (to be). To learn to use MS Excel to create a flow chart go to https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/create-a-flow-chart-with-smartart-30f87402-ba3d-48c8-8e9f-a66bcee7e5aa
Measure your current process using metrics. Yhe most common metric is time.
 identify and Analyze steps using process improvement techniques needing improvement (barriers, bottlenecks, etc.)
After responding to all of the prompts on the worksheet, Write your executive summary and submit the completed flowchart worksheet.
Submit Week 1 Process Improvement Flowchart Worksheet. (Show your work)Include:A current flowchart (As-Is) – should reflect a minimum of 8 or more steps in the process.The process must be measured and shown on the As-Is flowchart. A Metric may be time, cost, or another metric that allows you to analyze the data and identify a bottleneck in the process.After your analysis of the As-Is flowchart, recommend a solution to eliminate the bottleneck and create a second (2nd) flowchart (To-Be)
You may include the flowcharts on the Worksheet, or you can attach the flowcharts separately to the assignment.
Use subject line of:Student Name, Assignment week, date dueExampleMichael Lindquist, Week 1, 4.24.2023Resources

Ab116: accounting ii unit 5: unit 5: long-term liabilities –

General Electric ® Capital, a division of General Electric, uses long-term debt extensively. In early 2002, GE Capital issued $11 billion in long-term debt to investors, and then within days filed legal documents to prepare for another $50 billion long-term debt issue. As a result of the $50 billion filing, the price of the initial $11 billion offering declined (due to higher risk of more debt).
Bill Gross, a manager of a bond investment fund, “denounced a ‘lack in candor’ related to GE’s recent debt deal.” He said, “it was the most recent and most egregious example of how bondholders are mistreated.” Gross argued that GE was not forthright when GE Capital recently issued $11 billion in bonds, one of the largest issues ever from a U.S. corporation. What bothered Gross is that 3 days after the issue, the company announced its intention to sell as much as $50 billion in additional debt, warrants, preferred stock, guarantees, letters of credit, and promissory notes at some future date.”
In your opinion, did GE Capital act unethically by selling $11 billion of long-term debt without telling those investors that a few days later it would be filing documents to prepare for another $50 billion debt offering? Please explain why the action is unethical and if the action is illegal as well.
Source:
Alban, J. (2002). Gross shakes the bond market; GE calms it, a bit. Barron’s.

Case study: oversight systems | Marketing homework help

List the question, then provide your response. 1.5 or double spaced. 12pt font. Times New Roman.
Limit your deliverable to no more than 8 pages (less is certainly fine, but be concise… not including works cited).
Good responses should be supported by cited case evidence and readings/material from the course.
Answer the following case questions:

Should Oversight pursue a partnership with Global Credit and/or Banking Worldwide? In making this decision, please specify the terms and conditions of a channel partnership, including price, exclusivity (or not), support, and the roles and responsibilities of Oversights and a channel partner. Which of these terms would you view as “must haves” if you were Patrick Taylor, and which would you view as “nice to have”?
In your view, what should be the goal(s) of a channel partnership at this stage of the venture? Please indicate how GC or BW does or does not help Oversight to achieve those goals.
What is Oversight selling? What is the customer buying? What are the implications of the buying and selling process for evaluating potential channel partners?
What can we learn about successful and unsuccessful channel partnerships form Oversight’s previous experience with Enterprise Software Giant and Concur? What are the implications for a potential partnership with GC or BW?

Consider the pivot Oversight made in its product line from the customized CCM offering to the IOD product line. What changed in the venture and what are the implications?

Assignment: controversy associated with personality and paraphilic

 
Between 10% and 20% of the population experience personality disorders. They are difficult to treat as individuals with personality disorders are less likely to seek help than individuals with other mental health disorders. Treatment can be challenging as they do not see their symptoms as painful to themselves or others.
Paraphilic disorders are far more common in men than in women, and generally quite chronic, lasting at least two years. Treatment of these disorders usually involves both psychotherapeutic and pharmacologic treatments.
In this Assignment, you will explore personality and paraphilic disorders in greater detail. You will research potentially controversial elements of the diagnosis and/or treatment and explain ethical and legal considerations when working with these disorders.
To Prepare

Review this week’s Learning Resources and consider the insights they provide on assessing, diagnosing, and treating personality and paraphilic disorders.
Select a specific personality or paraphilic disorder from the DSM-5 to use for this Assignment.
Use the Walden Library to investigate your chosen disorder further, including controversial aspects of the disorder, maintaining the therapeutic relationship, and ethical and legal considerations. 

The Assignment
In 2–3 pages:

Explain the controversy that surrounds your selected disorder.
Explain your professional beliefs about this disorder, supporting your rationale with at least three scholarly references from the literature.
Explain strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a patient that may present with this disorder.
Finally, explain ethical and legal considerations related to this disorder that you need to bring to your practice and why they are important.

Week 8 for magz64 | Law homework help

Week 8 Case Questions
Select TWO court cases (from different chapters) from the list below, and respond in writing to the case questions. 

Dillon v. Champion Jogbra (Ch 18, p 672)
Dorshkind v. Oak Park Place of Dubuque II (Ch 18, p 681)
Lockheed Martin v. Administrative Review Board (Ch 18, p 689)
Lane v. Franks (Ch 18, p 707)
Weekes-Walker v. Macon County Greyhound Park (Ch 19, p 730)
Barnett v. PA Consulting Group (Ch 19, p 736)
Nanomech v. Suresh (Ch 19, p 751)

 
The requirements below must be met for your paper to be accepted and graded:

Write between 750 – 1,250 words (approximately 3 – 5 pages) using Microsoft Word in APA style, see example below.
Use font size 12 and 1” margins.
Include cover page and reference page.
At least 80% of your paper must be original content/writing.
No more than 20% of your content/information may come from references.
Use at least three references from outside the course material, one reference must be from EBSCOhost. Text book, lectures, and other materials in the course may be used, but are not counted toward the three reference requirement.
Cite all reference material (data, dates, graphs, quotes, paraphrased words, values, etc.) in the paper and list on a reference page in APA style.

References must come from sources such as, scholarly journals found in EBSCOhost, CNN, online newspapers such as, The Wall Street Journal, government websites, etc. Sources such as, Wikis, Yahoo Answers, eHow, blogs, etc. are not acceptable for academic writing. 

Application: implementing threading in a client-server protocol

Application: Implementing Threading in a Client-Server Protocol
Server programs are rarely implemented as non-threaded applications, even though that is how you implemented your previous server application. Servers would not be able to provide the necessary throughput unless they used threading to allow for I/O to occur concurrently with servicing client requests.
For this Assignment, you will modify your finger server program from Week 6 to use threads. The server should activate a new thread to process each incoming client request, thus allowing client requests to be processed concurrently.
To prepare:
Start up NetBeans.
Open your implementation of the finger protocol from Week 6.
By Day 7, modify your finger server program to use threads. The server should activate a new thread to process each incoming client request, thus allowing client requests to be processed concurrently.
In addition, write a 5- to 7-page paper documenting the changes that you made and analyzing the impact the changes will have on the overall throughput and latency of the server.
 
Include in your paper responses to these questions:
 
What other solutions might you consider in order to increase throughput and reduce latency?
Which solution do you consider to have the better trade-off between performance and complexity?
Which solution do you consider to have the better application of modularity, abstraction, hierarchy, and layering?
Remember to properly cite your sources according to APA guidelines.
Save your implementation of the threaded finger server in a “.zip” file. You will also submit your paper documenting the implementation and analysis of your server separately