Is the level of borrowing of HAG, after the note issue, going beyond the optimal level of borrowing?

Help with finance/ case study review/3pagesThe paper should consist a brief description of the case, an explanation of the problem, alternative solutions, your recommendations, including materials, such as spreadsheets, needed to justify your recommendations.And these questions should be answered,HAG’s Singapore Note Issue:What is the st at which HAG is borrowing through the Singapore note issue (ignore taxes)?What is the likelihood that HAG will be downgraded within a year from its B rating from Standard & Poor’s?Is the level of borrowing of HAG, after the note issue, going beyond the optimal level of borrowing?How will the risk to HAG’s equity be affected by the issue? Will the stock price go down? Is it time for the brokerage firm to offload its equity holding in HAG?HAG’s Singapore Note Issue.pdf

Debate the appropriate balance between profit and people that will achieve alignment of a company’s vision and goals.

I have started the assignmentDebate the appropriate balance between profit and people that will achieve alignment of a company’s vision and goals.Assessment DetailsAfter completing FLIGBY, scenes 1-19, and the assigned readings, you will focus on ways to manage conflict in the workplace and to empower employees. Part of your challenge will be to recognize common difficulties you and other managers might have in delegating. What are the inner motivations that keep you and others from delegating work? What are the outcomes and challenges from under-delegating? How do these problems affect conflict resolution?You will pick one of these conflicts, and outline a plan for negotiating through it to reach a resolution. Then, you will assign tasks/responsibilities to each party that reflect the outcome(s) of the negotiation. Explain how you believe this delegation will help solve the conflict. What challenges will your approach likely bring? How will you overcome those challenges?Readings:Srividya, N., & Basu, R. (2015). Conflicts between employee and employee and management in private organisations. Anvesha, 8(4),14-27.Fisher, R., Ury, W., & Patton, B. (1991). Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in. New York, N.Y: Penguin Books. 7-42.

As attorneys for Defendant Musk, argue that Musk did not defame Unsworth in his Twitter posts and his emails to Buzzfeed.

Please see your assigned Case Study for the final assignment below. The assignment sheet and grade rubric have been attached as wellPlease note: There’s no real city or state implied in this case. I use Cambridge or others city/university names strictly as fictitious places. You don’t need to look for case law that relates to a specific place.Case #6: Libel and Defamation of Character – Attorneys for DefendantUnsworth v. MuskPosture of the Case:In September 2018, a group of young football players became trapped in a Thai underground cave. International attention was given to the situation that became more dire each day the boys were trapped. British cave diver Vernon Unsworth joined the rescue operation and worked with other skilled divers to free the boys after two weeks. Tech billionaire Elon Musk and SpaceX engineers built a small submarine and shipped it to Thailand to help with the cave rescue. The device was not used and critics, including Unsworth, called it a PR stunt. After the rescue team rebuffed Musk’s submarine, Musk accused Unsworth of being a pedophile. Unsworth has filed a defamation suit against Musk in Los Angeles federal court for $75,000.Background of the Case:After the successful rescue of the footballers in Thailand, Unsworth says Musk “embarked on a PR campaign to destroy” his reputation after becoming angry at an interview he gave to the US television network, CNN.Unsworth had told the broadcaster that Musk’s device “had absolutely no chance of working,” that Musk “had no conception of what the cave passage was like” and that Musk could “stick his submarine where it hurts.”Vernon Unsworth alleges that Musk falsely accused him on Twitter of being a pedophile and seeks at least $75,000 in damages and a court order preventing Musk from making further allegations. The diver accuses Musk of “publishing false and heinous accusations of criminality against him to the public” when Musk posted a series of tweets directed at Unsworth on 15 July, calling his claims about the submarine into question and adding: “Sorry pedo guy, you really did ask for it.” At that time, Musk had approximately 22.5 million Twitter followers. Musk later deleted the Twitter posts and issued an apology stating that he was “just kidding.” The diver further alleges that Musk later sent emails to the media site Buzzfeed accusing Unsworth of moving to Thailand to be with a child bride who was about 12 years old and claiming that Unsworth had been removed from the rescue team over allegations of being a pedophile. Musk also responded to Buzzfeed’s request for comment by saying, “I suggest that you call people you know in Thailand, find out what’s actually going on and stop defending child rapists, you f—— a——.” Musk said the email was off the record, but BuzzFeed claimed the publication never agreed to that stipulation.As attorneys for Defendant Musk, argue that Musk did not defame Unsworth in his Twitter posts and his emails to Buzzfeed.

Evaluate key exposures and sensitive issues for any six of the 16 critical industries used by DHS, CISA, and the FBI. In addition, evaluate the cyber exposure of one significant at-risk population.

Given the current geopolitical tensions around the world, you must understand how this nation’s critical infrastructure may be exposed to these threats.Evaluate key exposures and sensitive issues for any six of the 16 critical industries used by DHS, CISA, and the FBI. In addition, evaluate the cyber exposure of one significant at-risk population.For this assignment, be sure to address the following:Construct a matrix for the 16 critical industries and indicate their exposure to top threats and vulnerabilities.Develop a formal paper plus the specified matrix that may add two additional pages.Your paper should be suitable for distribution by a consulting firm to evaluate the 16 critical industries with a spotlight on the two specified industries.Length: 6 pages, not including title and reference pages, one matrixReferences: Include a minimum of 6 scholarly references. Cite at least 2 different peer-reviewed academic research studies relevant to your approach for this assignment. These specified references should not be in this course and have been published in the last two yearsThe completed assignment should address all of the assignment requirements, exhibit evidence of concept knowledge, and demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the content presented in the course. The writing should integrate scholarly resources, reflect academic expectations and current APA standards, and submit a plagiarism report

Describe the impact of the risk occurring and discuss how it could be prevented, mitigated, or recovered from if it happens.

Risks are best handled by developing a risk matrix, which is a plan for identifying and managing potential risks. Develop and post a risk matrix for the project you proposed in Week 4 or for the Hard Rock hotel under construction collapses: Buildings around Canal Street site evacuated. In your risk matrix, state the risk, describe it and what might cause it, and note the risk of occurrence (probability) as high, medium, or low. Describe the impact of the risk occurring and discuss how it could be prevented, mitigated, or recovered from if it happens.Be sure to respond to at least one of your classmates’ postsWebsite link below: Hard Rock hotel under construction collapses: Buildings around Canal Street site evacuatedhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2304420241?accountid=30530&parentSessionId=Pkh30MeEaYqVdCz39dcnSVBlbOdOlxLqXP0jOL5PPyU%3D

Specify the key requirements for police officers in determining the lawfulness of the use of force in making an arrest and what is meant by “reasonableness.”

IntroductionA controversial issue today in the American legal system is the justification of the use of force by police officers, given the actions and conduct of citizens. In this assignment, you will explore the requirements for use of force, constitutional rights pursuant to the Bill of Rights when it comes to free speech, and criminal defenses justifying actions.InstructionsWrite a 2–3-page paper in which you:Specify the key requirements for police officers in determining the lawfulness of the use of force in making an arrest and what is meant by “reasonableness.”Evaluate how free speech rights clash with the rights of others and the need for public order today.Argue for or against the regulation of the First Amendment when it comes to speech that could or might incite “imminent lawless action or conduct.”Analyze the defenses within today’s criminal law system.Evaluate the fairness of the common law defense of necessity when citizens use deadly force.Use at least three sources to support your writing. Choose sources that are credible, relevant, and appropriate. Cite each source listed on your source page at least one time within your assignment

Determine the fundamental ways in which the NCAA’s ethics program failed to prevent the scandals at Penn State, Ohio State, and the University of Arkansas.

Case Study 2: National Collegiate Athletic Association Ethics and Compliance ProgramDue Week 6 and worth 200 pointsRead “Case Study 6: National Collegiate Athletic Association Ethics and Compliance Program,” located on page 444 of the textbook.Write a four to six (4-6) page paper in which you:Determine the fundamental ways in which the NCAA’s ethics program failed to prevent the scandals at Penn State, Ohio State, and the University of Arkansas. Support your response with one (1) example from each of these schools’ scandals.Examine the principal ways in which the leadership of the NCAA contributed to the ethical violations of Penn State, Ohio State, and the University of Arkansas. Support your response with one (1) example from each of these schools’ scandals.Predict the key differences in the scenarios that occurred at Penn State, Ohio State, and the University of Arkansas if an effective ethics program was in place. Provide a rationale for your response.Postulate on two (2) actions that the NCAA leadership should take in order to regain the trust and confidence of students and stakeholders.Recommend two (2) measures that the HR departments of colleges and universities should take to prevent similar incidents from occurring in the future. Provide a rationale for your response.Use at least three (3) quality academic resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and other similar Websites do not qualify as academic resources.Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

Describe how you could attempt to correct this issue without greatly increasing costs.

250 wordsReadingsUse your Social Policy and Social Programs text to complete the following:Read Chapter 5, “Who Gets What, How Much, Under What Conditions: Analysis of Eligibility Benefits,” pages 80–105.Use the Capella Library to complete the following:For this discussion, consider the following:A public program requires prior contributions to meet a minimal threshold amount before it distributes benefits. However, the contribution amount is excessively high for many families, especially minorities in your community. Describe how you could attempt to correct this issue without greatly increasing costs.Use this unit’s readings to inform your post and discussion.

From the reading explain the basic elements of Lessig’s framework (Market, Law, Architecture, and Norms) in an organized fashion.

Read pgs 120-137 from Lessig’s book titled “Code”. From the reading explain the basic elements of Lessig’s framework (Market, Law, Architecture, and Norms) in an organized fashion. Your final product should be two pages and is expected to be a 300 level paper. Be sure to use APA formatting for all resources.

Discuss how the security principles of deception and separation can be applied at the national level to protect against attacks from hostile foreign nations.

Recently, the Pentagon has concluded that computer sabotage coming from another country can constitute an act of war. The pentagon’s first formal cyber strategy, unclassified portions of which became public in June of 2011, represents an early attempt to grapple with a changing world in which a hacker could pose a significant threat to U.S nuclear reactors, subways or pipelines from a hostile country’s military. Recent cyber-attacks on the Pentagon’s systems by another foreign country have given new urgency to U.S efforts to develop a more formalized approach to cyber-attacks.Read more https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/08-21-18%20Lewis%20Testimony.pdfIn this week, you learned about the security principles of deception and separation.Discuss how the security principles of deception and separation can be applied at the national level to protect against attacks from hostile foreign nations. Identify the four stages of deceptions and how this can employed at the national level. Also, in discussing the concept of separation, ensure to identify how the concept of separation would be different in the context of national infrastructure protection. Please provide examples to support your discussion.Please make sure this is of 300 words and with no plagiarism in APA format with references.

× How can I help you?