Describe how one recent change in the marketplace (purchasing habits or social, economic, and political events, for example) has affected distribution of products.

Reflect from Milestone 2-1, 4-2 to complete.in the Module Two milestone, you selected a product and developed a persona that reflects your target market. Your work on this milestone must be based on the same product selection Gourmet truffles with fruit, herb, and flower extract infusions. Review the feedback from your instructor on your persona, and make any needed improvements before completing this assignment. Your work on this milestone must be based on that corrected persona.In this milestone, you will consider how to make decisions about place, meaning the distribution channels to use for your chosen product. Specifically, you will consider trends in the marketplace that are affecting distribution channel use and which distribution channel may be appropriate for the target market (i.e., persona). Specifically, you must address the following rubric criteria:Recent Change in the Marketplace: Describe how one recent change in the marketplace (purchasing habits or social, economic, and political events, for example) has affected distribution of products.Distribution Channel: Recommend one potential distribution channel (direct-to-consumer, retail, wholesale, distributor, or agent/broker) for your chosen product, and explain why it is appropriate given your product and persona. (Use the persona you developed in the Module Two milestone with revisions based on instructor feedback.)

How the program has been changed as a result of the evaluation

Select a federal, state, local, or not-for-profit program that has been changed based on feedback and evaluation.Write a 1,200 word paper in which you describe the following:The internal and external feedback mechanismsThe information generated from the feedbackHow the program has been changed as a result of the evaluationFormat your paper consistent with APA guidelines.

Republican conservatives are now arguing for a smaller federal government.  The authors, Hacker and Pierson argue that government is central to our shared prosperity.  Discuss.

From the book (Jacob Hacker and Paul Pierson, American Amnesia. Simon and Schuster, 2016. ISBN 9781451667820) write Five pages double space.The main purpose of this paper is to answer the following questions in one essay:1. In Chapter Nine the authors discuss three policy areas — Health care, Finance, Energy – that have benefited from interest group efforts. Discuss the interest group efforts in these policy areas. Make specific reference to the American Amnesia book.2. Republican conservatives are now arguing for a smaller federal government. The authors, Hacker and Pierson argue that government is central to our shared prosperity. Discuss. Which side are you on? Make reference to the American Amnesia book.

research whether the press has right of access to terrorist events and areas. What legal issues are related to this right of access.

Right of Access Using the internet and course resources, research whether the press has right of access to terrorist events and areas. What legal issues are related to this right of access. How does this impact the First Amendment?

What was the key area of concern you addressed to assist your city?

https://www.icivics.org/games/peoples-piehttp://www.gothamgazette.com/budgetgame/One of the most difficult tasks for governments is budgeting.The federal budget when compiled looks like a big city phone book.Public officials ask themselves where they can make cuts,where they can increase revenues,whether they should increase taxes and other concerns,while at same time hoping to keep a majority of their citizens happy.Below are links to a budgeting simulation that involves the budget for the City of New York and another game,People’s Pie,which allows you to set tax policies for corporations and individuals and establish funding priorities.Please play both games and then share your experiences in a short paper of1–3paragraphs responding to the questions below.In one to three paragraphs answer the following questions:Was there anything that you wanted to do but couldn’t find the money?What was the key area of concern you addressed to assist your city?Discuss some of your biggest challenges or decisions.Include any other observations about these simulations.

Discuss the relationship between the legislative branch (Congress) and the executive branch (President).

Discuss the relationship between the legislative branch (Congress) and the executive branch (President). You can use any scholarly sources. Describe the relationship between the two branches of government.You may think about the following questions as you write:– What happens when the President’s agenda differs from that of Congress? -How does the President push his legislative agenda through Congress?-What happens when Congress passes laws and the President does not agree with those laws?-What happens when a bill passes through both houses of Congress and the President does not sign the bill?-Is there anything that Congress can do to override the President’s veto.NOTES:– Due in 10 hours from now.– 650 words.– Use online credible sources.

What were the relevant legal issues?

CHANCE OF SURVIVAL DIMINISHEDOn the afternoon of May 20, the patient, Mr. Ard, began feeling nauseated. He was in pain and had shortness of breath. Although his wife rang the call bell several times, it was not until sometime later that evening that someone responded and gave Ard medication for the nausea. The nausea continued to worsen. Mrs. Ard then noticed that her husband was having difficulty breathing. He was reeling from side to side in bed. Believing that her husband was dying, she continued to call for help. She estimated that she rang the call bell for 1.25 hours before anyone responded. A code was eventually called. Unfortunately, Mr. Ard did not survive the code. There was no documentation in the medical records for May 20, between 5:30 PM and 6:45 PM, that would indicate that any nurse or physician checked on Ard’s condition. This finding collaborated Mrs. Ard’s testimony regarding this time period.A wrongful death action was brought against the hospital, and the district court granted judgment for Mrs. Ard. The hospital appealed.Ms. Krebs, an expert in general nursing, stated that it should have been obvious to the nurses from the physicians’ progress notes that the patient was a high risk for aspiration. This problem was never addressed in the nurses’ care plan or in the nurses’ notes.On May 20, Ard’s assigned nurse was Ms. Florscheim. Krebs stated that Florscheim did not perform a full assessment of the patient’s respiratory and lung status. There was nothing in the record indicating that she completed such an evaluation after he vomited. Krebs also testified that a nurse did not conduct a swallowing assessment at any time. Although Florscheim testified that she checked on the patient around 6:00 PM on May 20, there was no documentation in the medical record. Ms. Farris, an expert witness for the defense, testified on cross-examination that if a patient was in the type of distress described by Mrs. Ard and no nurse checked on him for 1.25 hours, that would fall below the expected standard of care.1What happened?Why did things go wrong?What were the relevant legal issues?How could the event have been prevented?What is your verdict?he similarities and differences between the American legal system and the legal structure of health care organizations.Regarding the American legal system and health care organizational legal structures, there are a multitude of similarities and differences. Both systems implement a degree of liability in the sense of governing bodies designed to facilitate the “agreed upon actions,” laws given a specified situation. As Miller cites (2006), “government is divided into three branches, legislative, executive, and judicial. On the federal level, statutes are enacted by Congress and only become law when approved by the president” (p.4). However, a particular bill can be over-ruled and disallowed by the Supreme Court of the United States. Miller adds (2006), “a method of overriding a Supreme Court decision, while complex and often time consuming, is to amend the Constitution” (p.4). Similarly, health care organizations implement governing boards, a group of individuals designed to regulate, instill, and facilitate specified laws and by-laws regarding the organization in question. Miller explains (2006), “almost all health care is delivered within an organized system. Clinical and regulatory complexity requires an infrastructure that can be provided only by a well-ordered structure. The organization of most health care entities, regardless of their type, includes a governing body and a chief executive officer” (p.29). Another interesting similarity exists between the American legal system and the legal structure of health care organizations. Both systems must comply with the specified laws imposed by the U.S. President, Congress, and the Supreme Court. A prime example would be the enactment of the laws governing workman’s compensation allocation and the unemployment benefits act for all workers.A subsequent and primary difference between the American legal system and the health care organizational legal structures centers on bylaws. For-profit organizations incorporate bylaws into policies and procedures and any changes are generally related to the workforce via addendums within the organizational personnel employee handbook. Interestingly, regarding the Long-Term care industry, specific laws governing the care of residents become enacted through federal and state mandates, such laws are enforced by federal and state agencies and must be followed by the individual Long-Term care facilities; however, the Long-Term care organizations cannot change such laws, policies, and procedures. Yet, the federal and state agencies can and do change these laws according to statistical incidence such as falls rates, medication errors, and reluctance to comply pertaining to yearly facility inspections. Another poignant and specific difference relates to appointment vs. election. Miller cites (2006), “health care entities ultimate responsibility centers on establishing goals and polices, select the chief executive, and appoint medical staff members” (p.30). Within the American legal system, the chief executive leaders are elected and maintain their position through the process of re-election.Lastly, the monetary acquisition of funds regarding the for-profit organizations centers on investors, multiple corporations, and stakeholders/ stocks. However, federal organizations are funded through taxation of its citizenry. Interestingly, there are in place a great deal of federal and state regulations regarding the offering, sale, and re-sale of company stock and partnership interests. Wolper (2004) suggests that, “historically, the legal structure of the health care delivery system in the United States consists almost exclusively of personal interactions between patients and physicians. Today, the health care delivery system is almost completely composed of corporate entities, many of which are investor owned” (p.93). Through similarities and differences of the American legal system and the health care organizational legal structures, it is interesting to view the justification of the intermingling and adaptation of principles that appear to be borrowed from the American legal system and incorporated into the health care organizational legal system. Yet, with this said, the federal government provides more than just structure for health care organizations, they implement a great deal of the mandated policies and procedures that must be followed with strict adherence, regardless of the health care organizations self-enacted laws, by-laws, polices, and procedures.ReferencesMiller, R. D. (2006).Problems in health care law. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.Wolper, L.F. (2004). Health Care Administration: planning, implementing, and managing organized delivery systems. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.Dr. Robert C. Smiles, Ph.D. Assistant Professor, University of Arizona Global Campus

Should business students be required to study the liberal arts, or should their time be spent studying current business trends and strategies exclusive??????????????????????ly?

T??????????????????????he Goal of This AssignmentThe objective of the Final Paper Outline Worksheet is to keep developing your final paper.THIS step will NOT look like a “traditional” paper. It is just a worksheet to develop the OUTLINE of your final paper.USE YOUR MODULE 3 “PROPOSAL WORKSHEET”–ALONG WITH MY COMMENTS ON THAT WORKSHEET THAT I RETURNED TO YOU–TO HELP YOU WITH THIS STEP.The Final Paper in Module 7 WILL look like traditional paper. It will be based off of this outline worksheetAfter you turn this assignment in, I’ll offer my comments. You’ll use those comments to write your final paper in Week 7.LogisticsDownload the following Final Paper Outline WorksheetYou can download the Final Paper Outline Worksheet by clicking on the following link:Click HERE to download the Final Paper Outline Worksheet! Download Click HERE to download the Final Paper Outline Worksheet!Complete it in its ??????????????????????entirety.Submit your completed worksheet hereFOLLOW THE DIRECTIONS ON THE WORKSHEET VERY, VERY CAREFULLY!GradingThis assignment is not “graded”However, I will comment extensively on your Outline Worksheet and return to youStudents who do not turn in their worksheet outline will be subject to a reduction of 10% off of their Final Paper in Module 7REMINDER: Here is the paper prompt you’re writing about:The liberal arts include (but are not limited to) philosophy, literature, theater, and history. Each of these disciplines, when studied rigorously, explore the nature of human behavior, decision making, logic, argument, and cultural difference. They have little to say about the current trends and strategies associated with business and industry. Should business students be required to study the liberal arts, or should their time be spent studying current business trends and strategies exclusive??????????????????????ly?

Critique the current debates and theory/research in healthcare leadership

A??????????????????????ssessment Question:In relation to the literature in Module 1:Critique the current debates and theory/research in healthcare leadershipJustify how a theory/practice is applicable in your current leadership practiceAssess how this theory/practice relates to organisational culture by motivating staffMake a conclusion about these issues and how they’ll operate in your own organisation/professional domain, or sphere of influence.Coversheet: Please add this coversheet to the front of you assignment.Download hereRubric: Please view the rubric and marking guidance Download hereWord Count: 2,000 words +/- 10%Weighting: 80% of Module 1 gradePassing Requirement:There are two elements to the Module 1 assessment. This Part A essay is wor??????????????????????th 80%. The Part B Self-Assessment & PDP is worth 20%.Compensation between Part A and Part B is permitted.An overall grade of 50% (as calculated by the weighted average of both parts) is required to pass the moduleAttempts allowed: First submission and resubmission if overall module result is not passedSimilarity Threshold:Submissions with TurnItIn similarity score between 10-25% will be reviewed by the programme team.Submissions with TurnitIn similarity scores >25% will be automatically referred to the university for investigation. Please note enrolment is suspended while investigations are carried out.you my access https://learn.iheed.orgsection of assignments also in resources you may found a recording of module 1 assessment revi??????????????????????ew.

W??????????????????????rite a 2-page argumentative essay arguing against a social injustice such as mass incarceration, all forms of discrimination, sexism, women’s rights, LGBTQ rights, police brutality or any area of social injustice that interests you.

W??????????????????????rite a 2-page argumentative essay arguing against a social injustice such as mass incarceration, all forms of discrimination, sexism, women’s rights, LGBTQ rights, police brutality or any area of social injustice that interests you.Remember, you can use the tools you have been reading this semester, such as The Writer’s Presence, The New Jim Crow Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness, and the films: The Color Purple and The Princess and the Frog. You are required to use up to five sources.Vocabulary words to useInfer (v) verb (used with object), in·ferred, in·fer·ring.to derive by reasoning; conclude or judge from premises or evidence: They inferred his displeasure from his cool tone of voice.(of facts, circumstances, statements, etc.) to indicate or involve as a conclusion; lead to.to guess; speculate; surmise.to hint; imply; suggest.verb (used without object), in·ferred, in·fer·ring.to draw a conclusion, as by reasoning.Articulate (v) (used with object), ar????????????????????????tic·u·lat·ed, ar·tic·u·lat·ing.to utter clearly and distinctly; pronounce with clarity.Phonetics. to make the movements and adjustments of the speech organs necessary to utter (a speech sound).verb (used without object), ar·tic·u·lat·ed, ar·tic·u·lat·ing.to clearly pronounce each of a succession of speech sounds, syllables, or words; enunciate: to articulate with excessive precision.Phonetics. to articulate a speech sound.Iterate (v) (used with object), it·er·at·ed, it·er·at·ing.to do (something) over again or repeatedly.to utter again or repeatedly.To develop (a product, process, or idea) by building upon previous versions or iterations, using each version as the point of departure for refinements and tweaks: The manufacturer will iterate production and distribution schedules based on consumer demand. We iterate the app after each round of customer feedback.Reiterate (v) (used with object), re·it·er·at·ed, re·it·er·at·ing.to say or do again o??????????????????????r repeatedly repeat, often excessively.

× How can I help you?