Describe your philosophy of education

The Big InterviewThe Final Project requires you to integrate the work you undertook throughout the course into a multimedia presentation. You can use any of the following multimedia tools; Present.me,Jing, Screenr, or VoiceThread.Scenario: The school you researched during this course is being taken over the by the state for poor performance. Based on your educational philosophy, your classroom management plan, lesson plan, and the learning activities and assessment you developed in this course, the new principal has asked you to interview for the lead teacher position. This position would allow you to teach the grade of your choosing and give you the authority to enact significant changes across the school. You are one of only 20 candidates asked to apply for this prestigious position. You have been asked to submit a multimedia interview presentation instead of interviewing in person. The principal has requested that you include the following in your presentation: Create a PowerPoint presentation of eight to ten slides that includes:A slide that includes a brief self-introduction and summary of the position for which you are applyingA slide on your Philosophy of Education (from Week 1)A slide on a Classroom management plan (from Week 2)A slide on Different school models (from Week 3)A slide on Effective lesson planning and design to include the Student’s Role in the learning process (from Week 4)A slide on Assessment Matters (from Week 5)A slide on Professional Learning Communities (PLC) (from Newman (2012) Chapter 14 and in Week Six-Discussion One)A slide that lists the references in APA style (minimum of three) used in your presentation. Consider using the references from the previous weeks’ assignments. Create a multimedia interview of no more than eight to ten minutes. You can use any of the following multimedia tools; Present.me, Jing, Screenr, or VoiceThread. Present your PowerPoint from Step 1 as if you were interviewing for the position remotely. As you present your slides in the multimedia interview, use the audio or video feature to record yourself discussing the following:Introduce yourself and the position for which you are applyingDescribe your philosophy of educationShare a personal idea of a successful classroom management planExplain and support your chosen school model that you recommend that the school should implementIdentify lesson planning and design, and the role that students play in the learning processDiscuss how assessment matters in relation to the role for which you are interviewingShare your thoughts on the meaning of building a Professional Learning Community (PLC), and what you would expect to see if you entered a PLC-focused classroomWhat to submit to Waypoint: In a Microsoft Word document, paste the link to your multimedia presentation. Before you submit your link as your Final Project, send it to yourself in an email, and access the link that you sent yourself to ensure that it opens. If your professor cannot click on the link to view your presentation then it cannot be properly graded.Carefully review the Grading Rubric for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment. THIS TUTORIAL INCLUDES 3 PRESENTATIONS FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT TO HELP YOU SCORE BETTER( Three Different Presentations Without Multimedia Interveiw )

What is the function of this rite within the particular society?

A rite of passage is a ritual that helps mark a person’s transition from one status to another. All cultures have rites of passage to mark these important transitions. With that in mind, choose a rite of passage either from the textbook or from your own research. What is the function of this rite within the particular society?Your initial post should be at least 250 words in length. Support your claims with examples from the required material(s) and/or other scholarly resources, and properly cite any references. Required Text Crapo, R. H. (2013). Cultural anthropology. San Diego, CA: Bridgepoint Education.

Discuss the methodological issues and challenges that are unique to psychological research investigating effective treatments for psychological disorders.

Methodological Issues Article ReviewRead the following articles, which can be accessed through the ProQuest database in the Ashford University Library:Evidence-based practice in psychology: Implications for research and research training.Practice-based evidence: Back to the future.Psychological treatments: Putting evidence into practice and practice into evidence.Write a three- to four-page article review in which you discuss methodological issues unique to psychological research and analyze basic applied psychological research relevant to the treatment of mental disorders. In your paper, you will discuss the topics of evidence-based practice and practice-based evidence and their roles in providing practitioners useful information for making decisions about appropriate mental health treatments.In the body of your paper:Discuss the methodological issues and challenges that are unique to psychological research investigating effective treatments for psychological disorders.Explain the concepts of evidence-based practice and practice-based evidence and identify controversies associated with these concepts.Select one treatment modality associated with a disorder in the DSM-5 and present at least one example of pertinent, applied psychological research investigating the efficacy of the treatment modality. Discuss the findings of the research. Locate at least one peer-reviewed article that contains a research study on a treatment modality to fulfill this requirement. You may not use any of the course materials.Take the point of view of Bauer (2007) to analyze the article(s) you selected in #3. Using this author’s arguments from his Evidence-Based Practice in Psychology: Implications for Research and Research Training article, what would be his evaluation of the article(s) you selected?Take the point of view of Brendtro, Mitchell, & Doncaster (2011) and analyze the article(s) you selected in #3. Using these authors’ arguments from their Practice-Based Evidence: Back to the Future article, what would be their evaluation of the article(s) you selected?Discuss ways in which an evidence-based practice model might provide practitioners useful information for making decisions about the degree to which the treatment modality you selected in #3 is an appropriate treatment for the disorder you specified.Conclude your paper with a discussion of your opinion of the utility of evidence-based practice and practice-based evidence for practitioners needing to identity effective treatments for psychological disorders.Utilize a minimum of two additional peer-reviewed journal articles published within the last five years (not including the course text or any of the course materials). At least one article must be used to satisfy the requirement in #3, and at least one article must also be included to support your arguments. All sources must be documented in APA style, as outlined by the Ashford Writing Center.Writing the Methodological Issues Article ReviewThe Assignment:Must be three to five double-spaced pages in length, and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.Must include a title page with the following:Title of paperStudent’s nameCourse name and numberInstructor’s nameDate submittedMust begin with an introductory paragraph that has a succinct thesis statement. (Refer to the Ashford Writing Center Thesis Generator ).Must address the topic of the paper with critical thought.Must end with a conclusion that summarizes your opinion of the utility of evidence-based practice and practice-based evidence for practitioners needing to identity effective treatments for psychological disorders.Must utilize each of the three required articles: Bauer (2007); Brendtro, Mitchell, & Doncaster (2011) and Dozois (2013).Must utilize a minimum of two additional peer-reviewed sources published within the last five years (not including the course text).Must document all sources in APA style, as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.Must include a separate reference page, formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.

Describe how Jung’s own life experiences may have influenced his concept of human personality.

Carl Gustav JungDuring Week 3, we evaluate Jung’s and Horney’s psychodynamic view of personality. Through our discussions and homework, we will examine the role of the collective unconscious in personality development and investigate the role of social interaction on personality growth. In addition, we will examine the rise of feminine psychology and its implications for personality theory.The summary below provides a preview of all the activities for the week. When you are ready to get started, please proceed to the Lecture for more detailed information on assignments and expectations.Karen HorneySummary of Week 3 Activities: TopicReadingsActivitiesDue ThursdayDue SundayPsychodynamic Theory: Jung and HorneyChapters 4 and 6 1st discussion postings in response to instructor’s discussion questionDebate information (assigned group only)Reading: textbook and lecture.Remainder of discussion postings in response to questions, comments, feedback or follow-upHomeworkMastery questionsJournalGroup A or group B response as assignedLearning Objectives:After studying Chapter 4 – Jung: Analytical Psychology, students should be able to:Describe how Jung’s own life experiences may have influenced his concept of human personality.Describe the Jungian levels of the psyche.List and describe eight major archetypes.Discuss Jung’s typology with the major attitudes and functions.Identify and describe Jung’s stages of personality development.Describe Jung’s concept of self-realization.Explain Jung’s idea of word association.Discuss Jung’s concept of dreams and how they relate to the unconscious.Summarize research of Jungian types and both physical attraction and academic performance.After studying Chapter 6 – Horney: Psychoanalytical Social Theory, students should be able to:Compare and contrast Horney’s theory with that of Freud.Discuss Horney’s concepts of basic hostility and basic anxiety.List and discuss Horney’s categories of neurotic needs.Describe Horney’s three neurotic trends.Explain Horney’s concept of intrapsychic conflicts.Discuss the modes of expression for self-hatred.Discuss Horney’s concept of feminine psychology.Discuss research on morbid dependency and explain how it relates to Horney’s view of moving toward other people.Discuss research on hypercompetitiveness and explain how it relates to Horney’s concept of moving against other people.Explain how Horney’s picture of the neurotic personality relates to normal personality.Please proceed to the lecture. Week 3: Psychodynamic Theory: Jung and Horney – LecturePsychodynamic Theory: Jung and HorneyMany of Freud’s original followers eventually split from a traditional psychodynamic approach due to differences in the emphasis placed on sexual and aggressive instincts. These early theorists are often referred to as Neo-Freudians as they share Freud’s focus on unconscious influence and intrapsychic conflict, but they take a new perspectives in examining personality motivation. This week, we will examine Jung’s and Horney’s contributions to the psychodynamic theory of personality to gain a thorough understanding of analytical and psychoanalytical social psychologies.To get started, read Chapter 4 – Jung: Analytical Psychology and Chapter 6 – Horney: Psychoanalytical Social Psychology. Carl JungJung was one of Freud’s most prized followers; Freud was even known to have referred to Jung as “my beloved son.” Jung was a brilliant theorist; but, equally important during this era, he was one of the first non-Jewish psychologists to join the Freudian movement. Jung’s religious status was especially important, as many of Freud’s ideas and theories were considered “Jewish” and easily dismissed by the general public who was flooded with anti-sematic messages from Hitler. Jung gave credibility and acceptance to Freud’s ideas concerning the unconscious. Over time though, the relationship between Freud and Jung became strained and their theories took very different directions. View the video clip “Jung and Freud” (text version ) to learn more about their turmulous relationship. After breaking from Freud, Jung proposed his own theory of personality which he called analytical psychology.Jung believed that the unconscious was a powerful influence on the formation of personality and the forces that motivate behavior. View the video “Jung’s Understanding of the Unconscious” (text version) for a detailed examination of the role of the unconscious. A key feature of his theory, is the differentiation between the personal unconscious and the collective unconscious. The personal unconscious is unique to each individual and is made up of personal experiences. The collective unconscious is a “shared” component of everyone’s unconscious that includes universal elements passed from generations of ancestors.Jung placed considerable emphasis on the collective unconscious and the influence of its contents. The highly developed, universal contents of the collective unconscious are called archetypes. View the video “Jung’s Explanation of Archetypes” (text version) to hear Jung describe the role and purpose of archetypes. Some of the most common archetypes are explained in the following table.ArchetypeExplanationpersonaThe persona is often called the “mask” of personality as it contains the aspects of our self (roles, attitudes, behaviors, etc.) that we are willing to show the outside world.shadowThe shadow is considered the persona’s evil twin as it contains the aspects of our personality that we wish to hide or disguise from our self and others.animaThe feminine aspect of a man’s personality representing irrational moods and emotions.animusThe masculine aspect of a woman’s personality symbolic of logic, thinking, and reasoning.selfThe innate, inherited potential for total growth and completion. The self moves us toward an individual perfection achieved through the unity of the other archetypes.The aspect of Jung’s theory that is most popular in modern psychology is the explanation of psychological types formed through the relationship between attitudes and functions. The following presentation highlights the formation of the eight Jungian personality types:PowerPoint on Jungian Personality Types (If the link does not work, please go to Doc Sharing to download the powerpoint. Remember to check out all the notes under each slide. The notes explain the slides)There are a variety of free tests to determine your personality typology using the Jungian system. If you are interested in knowing your personality type, take the Jung Typology Test, then go to Type Logic for an interpretation. Karen HorneyHorney proposed the psychoanalytic social theory of personality. Like the theorists we have discussed thus far, the roots of Horney’s theory lie in the psychodynamic tradition which acknowledges the importance of unconscious influences and intrapsychic conflict. Unique to Horney’s theory is the emphasis on the social and cultural factors that influence the formation of personality. Horney believed that the core personality is shaped in childhood and occurs as a direct result of the relationship between children and their parents.Children are born with basic needs (safety and satisfaction) and rely on their parents to create a loving, affectionate environment in which these needs can be met. When the needs are met, children have a solid basis for healthy personality growth and development. But, when these needs are not met, children develop a resentment toward the parents; Horney termed this resentment basic hostility. Because children are in a helpless position in relation to their parents, they are unable to express this hostility and respond by withdrawing. This, in turn, leads the child to develop basic anxiety which is characterized by feelings of insecurity and isolation.Horney believed that personality develops as a consequence of the attempt to deal with basic anxiety; she called these attempts neurotic needs. The neurotic needs can be grouped into three neurotic trends or fundamental styles of relating to people: moving toward people, moving against people, and moving away from people. The following chart shows the relationship between neurotic needs and neurotic trends.All individuals possess one of the fundamental styles of relating to people as basic conflict cannot be completely avoided. A person with a healthy personality shows spontaneous movement and operates within a socially-acceptable range of behaviors. The neurotic individual, on the other hand, is compulsive and tends to take an extreme position when forming interpersonal relationships. For example:Basic AttitudesNormal PersonalityNeurotic Personalitymoving towardfriendly, loving, affectionate, warmcompliant, clingy, codependentmoving againstcompetitive, goal-orientedaggressive, hostile, angrymoving away fromautonoumus, serene, independentdetached, isolated, emotionally-distantHorney’s theories continue to have an influence in the training of therapists and in our understanding of personality. Supplemental resources:Questions for further thought:Discuss Horney’s criticism of Freud.Discuss Horney’s concepts of neurotic needs and neurotic trends.Summarize he chief findings of Lyon and Greenberg’s 1991 study and discuss how it relates to Horney’s theory. Next Steps When you have finished with the readings and lecture material, you can proceed to the activities associated with this week’s work. You will need to: DISCUSSION:Jung used the term “persona” to mean the face or facade that we hold out to the world. The “persona” is that version of the self, the image or picture of the self, that we want, expect, and demand that others see. The “shadow” is that part of the self that we do not expect or want or allow others to see. The “shadow” consists of all that is hidden and held away from view, all that is secret and behind closed doors. We certainly don’t want others (in most day-to-day situations, and, certainly not in our professional lives) to see our faults and failings, doubts and confusions, and we most certainly don’t expect the world to have access to our fantasies and imaginings (or even that we have them). As Jung explained, everyone has a persona and a shadow, these are universal to all mankind. Your task for this week is to identify examples (either in movies, books, the popular media, or your own life) in which the “shadow” has revealed itself over the persona. As you look for your examples, reflect on the following questions: What is the relationship between the persona and the shadow? Is the shadow good or evil? Is it possible to repress the shadow from ever revealing itself? How do we know what is contained in an individual’s shadow? How is a persona formed? How is a shadow formed? You do NOT need to answer these questions individually, use the questions as a basis to form a reaction/explanation to the example your have identified. I would like you to share your example and provide your reflections on the relationship between the persona and the shadow specific to your example. At the end of your posting, please pose a follow-up question to the class. Finally, respond to TWO of the questions posed by your peers. General Discussion Reminders: You are required to post your initial answers by Friday at midnight; your comments on the postings of your classmates are due on Sunday at midnight. Please be sure that your comments to peers are substantive; in other words, do not simply write “I agree”; if you agree, go on to expand your comments and add your own insights. I will use the following grading rubric to score your discussion postings: 1 – 3 points – Provided only minimal response with no elaboration OR failed to complete follow-up postings. 4 – 7 points – Provided basic response and follow-up postings. All postings are clear and relevant, but need to be elaborated in more detail. 8 – 10 points – Provided detailed, complete responses and follow-up postings. All responses are elaborated and clear. NOTE: Post your initial comments to the discussion by clicking on the first “Respond” link below. To give feedback to a classmate’s post, click on the “Respond” link below his/her comment. FOR GROUP DISCUSSION:Week 3: Psychodynamic Theory: Jung and Horney – Topic Debate Overview Weeks 4 through 6, we are going to engage in weekly “topic debates.” The weekly debate topic will involve an in-depth investigation of a controversial topic relevant to the field of personality psychology. Each of you will be assigned to a group; you will debate against the other group in THREE weekly debates (the groups will be posted in an announcement on the course homepage…either Group A or Group B). In addition to providing an opportunity to engage in a lively debate on a topic relevant to personality psychology, the debates also requires you to fine-tune your skills in online communication. As such, a secondary goal of this project is effectively online peer-to-peer collaboration. Like all professional interactions and debates, the interdependent nature of the project is often more challenging than the topic you are focusing on. This type of communication is even more challenging in the online world; be sure that you debate in a professional, courteous manner. There is a separate Group A & Group B posting to coordinate your efforts. How the debates work: At the beginning of the term, I will assign each person to a debate group ( A or B ); each group will then be assigned to either the “yes” or “no” side of one of the debate topics (the names of each person in the group can be found in the announcement titled “Topic Debate Groups” that appears at the end of Week 3 or beginning of Week 4). For example, one topic debate might be “Should couples be required to take personality tests during premarital counseling?”. One group would be required to locate research and information to support a “yes” answer and the other group would be required to research and support a “no” answer.Please use the Debate group A & group B areas to coordinate your efforts. If someone is real good with computer presentations allow them to put it together in your group area for everyone in the group to see & agree before posting the official response on Friday.All topic debates will take place in a designated discussion thread.During each week 4-6, each group must provide ONE persuasive, informational post to the relevant discussion thread. This may be a page of written text, a PowerPoint presentation, a online video, or any other creative way of conveying your information. The information you provide does not have to be lengthy as long as it contains relevant information and is expanded to clearly explain your position. You are required to utilize and correctly reference one(1) quality, academic sources to support your position. You should use correct APA style in formatting your debate information.Each group must post their persuasive information by Friday at midnight. Finally, everyone in the class should read the debates and post his or her final thoughts by Sunday. When responding to the debates, you just need to write whether you support the “yes” or “no” side of the debate with a sentence or two highlighting why you support that position (also due on Sunday by midnight). You do not have to agree with the side of the debate that you were assigned to represent. Even though you will have researched to support one side of the debate you need to post what you decided after the debate is over.Points to keep in mind:While there is no “right” answer to this type of debate question, there is a body of research that either supports or refutes each side of the position. You should incorporate research into your response.This is a persuasive argument, not just an opinion. Your personal opinion may differ from the position that you are assigned to research and represent in the thread; this is fine, just be sure that you still create a persuasive argument for the assigned topic.I encourage you to be creative in your presentation of information. You are not limited to simple written text. You can use attachments or links to include a range of visual, audio or internet sources. Really push yourselves to represent your information in a creative, meaningful, interesting fashion. If you need ideas, please feel free to call or email and I will be happy to discuss your project with you.Because this project requires research, START EARLY! Do not wait until the last minute as it can be time consuming to prepare for a debate. You will notice that the topics are all listed on this page and the groups are assigned at the beginning of the term. This means that you should immediately start researching your debate question.Debate topics: WeekDebate TopicWeek 4Is personality a stable construct that is formed in childhood and remains relatively constant throughout the lifespan?Week 5Are parents responsible for the personality development and subsequent behavior of their children?Week 6Should a person be held legally responsible for criminal acts committed by their unconscious (or unconscious aspects of their personality)?Grading Rubric: 10 points per week (week 4, 5, and 6) CriteriaPoints Per Week correctly finds, interprets and utilizes relevant information (minimum 1 source)3able to communicate information in a persuasive manner3debate information is creative and interesting1correct use of grammar, spelling and APA style1individual response to the three weekly debates 2Total points times 3 for 30 points possible Week 3: Psychodynamic Theory: Jung and Horney – Group A – Discussion Group A – Say Hello to your team membersGroup A, you are assigned to the following sides of topic debates starting week 4 to week 6. Debate topics: WeekDebate Topic SideWeek 4Is personality a stable construct that is formed in childhood and remains relatively constant throughout the lifespan? YesWeek 5Are parents responsible for the personality development and subsequent behavior of their children? NoWeek 6Should a person be held legally responsible for criminal acts committed by their unconscious (or unconscious aspects of their personality)? YesThis page is available to your group members and the instructor. The other group cannot see anything here. Feel free to say hi to your members before the debate. Starting week 4, you will work as a group to coordinate all your thoughts to compose ONE group persuasive information.

develop a risk-management policy that addresses the two security breaches and how to mitigate these risks.

You have just been hired as an Information Security Engineer for a large, multi-international corporation. Unfortunately, your company has suffered multiple security breaches that have threatened customers’ trust in the fact that their confidential data and financial assets are private and secured. Credit-card information was compromised by an attack that infiltrated the network through a vulnerable wireless connection within the organization. The other breach was an inside job where personal data was stolen because of weak access-control policies within the organization that allowed an unauthorized individual access to valuable data. Your job is to develop a risk-management policy that addresses the two security breaches and how to mitigate these risks. SEC 280 Week 5 Case Study Risk Management Policy (***** 1171 Words + APA Format + Conclusion + References *****) SEC/280 Week 5 Case Study Risk Management PolicySEC280 Week 5 Case Study Risk Management PolicySEC 280 Week 5 Case Study SEC 280 Week 5 Case Study Risk Management Policy U can Also Purchase SEC 280 Week 6 Case Study Incident-Response Policy; Gem Infosys (*****Just Click On Below Link *****) http://www.homeworkmarket.com/content/sec-280-sec280-week-6-case-study-sec280-week-6-case-study

Explain how the social determinants of health may impact the global health issue you selected. Be specific and provide examples.

Assignment: Global Healthcare Comparison Matrix and Narrative StatementIf you talk about a possible poor health outcome, do you believe that outcome will occur? Do you believe eye contact and personal contact should be avoided?You would have a difficult time practicing as a nurse if you believed these to be true. But they are very real beliefs in some cultures.Differences in cultural beliefs, subcultures, religion, ethnic customs, dietary customs, language, and a host of other factors contribute to the complex environment that surrounds global healthcare issues. Failure to understand and account for these differences can create a gulf between practitioners and the public they serve.In this Assignment, you will examine a global health issue and consider the approach to this issue by the United States and by one other country. Assignment: (1- to 2-page Global Health Comparison Matrix; 1-page Plan for Social Change)Part 1: Global Health Comparison MatrixFocusing on the country you selected and the U.S., complete the Global Health Comparison Matrix. Be sure to address the following:Consider the U.S. national/federal health policies that have been adapted for the global health issue you selected from the WHO global health agenda. Compare these policies to the additional country you selected for study.Explain the strengths and weaknesses of each policy.Explain how the social determinants of health may impact the global health issue you selected. Be specific and provide examples.Using the WHO’s Organization’s global health agenda as well as the results of your own research, analyze how each country’s government addresses cost, quality, and access to the global health issue selected.Explain how the health policy you selected might impact the health of the global population. Be specific and provide examples.Explain how the health policy you selected might impact the role of the nurse in each country.Explain how global health issues impact local healthcare organizations and policies in both countries. Be specific and provide examples.Part 2: A Plan for Social ChangeReflect on the global health policy comparison and analysis you conducted in Part 1 of the Assignment and the impact that global health issues may have on the world, the U.S., your community, as well as your practice as a nurse leader.In a 1-page response, create a plan for social change that incorporates a global perspective or lens into your local practice and role as a nurse leader.Explain how you would advocate for the incorporation of a global perspective or lens into your local practice and role as a nurse leader.Explain how the incorporation of a global perspective or lens might impact your local practice and role as a nurse leader.Explain how the incorporation of a global perspective or lens into your local practice as a nurse leader represents and contributes to social change. Be specific and provide examples To Prepare:Review the World Health Organization’s (WHO) global health agenda and select one global health issue to focus on for this Assignment.Select at least one additional country to compare to the U.S. for this Assignment.Reflect on how the global health issue you selected is approached in the U.S. and in the additional country you selected.Review and download the Global Health Comparison Matrix provided in the Resources

How do geographically dispersed teams collaborate effectively?

This week’s journal articles focus on empowering leadership and effective collaboration in geographically dispersed teams, please answer the following questions:How do geographically dispersed teams collaborate effectively?Please find at least three tools on the market that teams can use to collaborate on a geographically dispersed team. Please note the pros and cons of each tool. Based on the research above, note which tool you would select if you were managing the geographically dispersed team and why.Be sure to use the UC Library for scholarly research. Google Scholar is also a great source for research. Please be sure that journal articles are peer-reviewed and are published within the last five years.The paper should meet the following requirements:4 pages in length (not including title page or references)APA guidelines must be followed. The paper must include a cover page, an introduction, a body with fully developed content, and a conclusion.A minimum of five peer-reviewed journal articles.The writing should be clear and concise. Headings should be used to transition thoughts. Don’t forget that the grade also includes the quality of writing.

discuss how the grammar and writing strategies and activities chosen build upon the previously taught reading and vocabulary skills.

Planning effective English language arts lessons involves focusing on multiple literacy skills, aligned to state or national standards, while incorporating interesting, student-centered activities. When focusing on grammar and writing, it is essential to set high expectations while presenting real-world connections, encouraging creativity, and keeping student interest in mind. Furthermore, focusing on using proper grammar and writing conventions in the ELA classroom is essential due to the interconnectivity of the two skill areas.For this assignment, use the “COE Lesson Plan Template” to create a standards-based grammar and writing lesson based on the selected literature.Include in your lesson:· Objectives aligned to state or national grade appropriate grammar and writing standards.· Content-specific vocabulary development.· Technology or multimedia that supports developmentally appropriate, engaging instruction.· Engaging instructional strategies and activities in grammar and writing.· Assessments aligned to learning objectives that are engaging for students and provide meaningful feedback.· Differentiation for exceptional students, culturally diverse students, and English language learners.In a 250-500 word rationale, discuss how the grammar and writing strategies and activities chosen build upon the previously taught reading and vocabulary skills.

What should Mark have done if Jack still was not able to resolve the problem?

1) APA FORMATE 2) ADD REFERENCES3)350 TO 400 WORDSQUESTIONS What should Mark have done if Jack still was not able to resolve the problem? Would it make sense for Mark to assign this problem to someone else now, after Jack could not solve the problem the second time around? McRoy Aerospace was a highly profitable company building cargo planes and refueling tankers for the armed forces. It had been doing this for more than fifty years and was highly successful. But because of a downturn in the government’s spending on these types of planes, McRoy decided to enter the commercial aviation aircraft business, specifically wide-body planes that would seat up to 400 passengers, and compete head on with Boeing and Airbus Industries. During the design phase, McRoy found that the majority of the commercial airlines would consider purchasing its plane provided that the costs were lower than the other aircraft manu- facturers. While the actual purchase price of the plane was a consideration for the buyers, the greater interest was in the life-cycle cost of maintaining the operational readiness of the aircraft, specifically the maintenance costs. Operations and support costs were a considerable expense and maintenance requirements were regulated by the government for safety reasons. The airlines make money when the planes are in the air rather than sitting in a maintenance hangar. Each maintenance depot maintained an inventory of spare parts so that, if a part did not function properly, the part could be removed and replaced with a new part. The damaged part would be sent to the manufacturer for repairs or replacement. Inventory costs could be significant but were considered a necessary expense to keep the planes flying. One of the issues facing McRoy was the mechanisms for the eight doors on the aircraft. Each pair of doors had their own mechanisms which appeared to be restricted by their location in the plane. If McRoy could come up with a single design mechanism for all four pairs of doors, it would significantly lower the inventory costs for the airlines as well as the necessity to train mechanics on one set of mechanisms rather than four. On the cargo planes and refuel- ing tankers, each pair of doors had a unique mechanism. For commercial aircrafts, finding one design for all doors would be challenging. Mark Wilson, One of the department managers at McRoy’s design center, assigned Jack, the best person he could think of to work on this extremely challenging project. If anyone could accomplish it, it was Jack. If Jack could not do it, Mark sincerely believed it could not be done. The successful completion of this project would be seen as a value-added opportunity for McRoy’s customers and could make a tremendous difference from a cost and efficiency stand- point. McRoy would be seen as an industry leader in life-cycle costing, and this could make the difference in getting buyers to purchase commercial planes from McRoy Aerospace. The project was to design an opening/closing mechanism that was the same for all of the doors. Until now, each door could have a different set of open/close mechanisms, which made 2. © 2010 by Harold Kerzner. Reproduced by permission. All rights reserved. Case Studies 333 the design, manufacturing, maintenance, and installation processes more complex, cumber- some, and costly. Without a doubt, Jack was the best—and probably the only—person to make this happen even though the equipment engineers and designers all agreed that it could not be done. Mark put all of his cards on the table when he presented the challenge to Jack. He told him wholeheartedly that his only hope was for Jack to take on this project and explore it from every possible, out-of- the-box angle he could think of. But Jack said right off the bat that this may not be possible. Mark was not happy hearing Jack say this right away, but he knew Jack would do his best. Jack spent two months looking at the problem and simply could not come up with the solu- tion needed. Jack decided to inform Mark that a solution was not possible. Both Jack and Mark were disappointed that a solution could not be found. “I know you’re the best, Jack,” stated Mark. “I can’t imagine anyone else even coming close to solving this critical problem. I know you put forth your best effort and the problem was just too much of a challenge. Thanks for trying. But if I had to choose one of your co-workers to take another look at this project, who might have even half a chance of making it happen? Who would you suggest? I just want to make sure that we have left no stone unturned,” he said rather glumly. Mark’s words caught Jack by surprise. Jack thought for a moment and you could practi- cally see the wheels turning in his mind. Was Jack thinking about who could take this project on and waste more time trying to find a solution? No, Jack’s wheels were turning on the sub- ject of the challenging problem itself. A glimmer of an idea whisked through his brain and he said, “Can you give me a few days to think about some things, Mark?” he asked pensively. Mark had to keep the little glimmer of a smile from erupting full force on his face. “Sure, Jack,” he said. “Like I said before, if anyone can do it, it’s you. Take all the time you need.” A few weeks later, the problem was solved and Jack’s reputation rose to even higher heights than before.

According to Abrahms, et al., process goals compete with outcome goals among principal and agent terrorist organizations. Explain a principal terrorist organization and an agent terrorist organization.

Read the articles below regarding the relationship between ideology and target selection and answer the questions that follow.InstructionsAnswer each of the following questions after you’ve read the listed articles. Each question will require a short essay response based on the reading material.According to Abrahms, et al., process goals compete with outcome goals among principal and agent terrorist organizations. Explain a principal terrorist organization and an agent terrorist organization. Give examples. In your view, which type of terrorist organization wields the most power to achieve its goals? Why?Abrahms, et al., frames the target selection of terrorists in terms of outcome versus process goals.Which type of terrorist organization is most likely to focus on outcome goals? Why?Which type of terrorist organization is most likely to focus on process goals? Why?Explain the types of targets the focus of each of these goals is likely to choose. Why does each desired goal, outcome and process, select the target it does?As explained by Wright, right-wing and left-wing terrorist groups generally focus on different groups as targets. What are the general differences Wright has found supported by the empirical data?Another generalization suggested by the data, according to Wright, was how European governments have responded to terrorist attacks. What are the generalizations Wright has noted?Is there normally a distinction between professed ideology of a group and that of the individual members? If so, why? If not, why not?What are major classifications for terrorist ideologies? Please note and briefly define those classifications.Wright presents a reasonable argument for the most opportunistic time for a government to confront a terrorist group. What is Wright’s generalization?According to Wright, what are the only consistent predictors of terrorist target selection? Provide illustrations that help explain this generalization.

× How can I help you?