identify the victims and the defendants, the rights of victims permitted under state law, the procedures to prosecute an accused, and the possible penalties based on the given scenario.

In this assignment, you will identify the victims and the defendants, the rights of victims permitted under state law, the procedures to prosecute an accused, and the possible penalties based on the given scenario.Centervale police officers, Anne and Justin, respond to a report of domestic dispute. There had been a total of nine calls for service, including two in the past year. On the way, Anne informs Justin that this may be a very volatile situation because this couple is constantly in and out of Domestic Violence Court; even though they separate all the time, they always get back together.Here’s What Happened . . .The officers arrive and knock on the door, “Hello! Police, can someone please come to the door?” A man yells “Come in!” from inside the house. They decide not to enter the residence under these circumstances to protect their own safety. Anne asks the man to come outside and speak to them.The door opens. A man, who identifies himself as Mike and a friend of the family, opens the door. He says that Lilly and her husband, Johnny, were just fighting and that there is no problem now. Mike did not appear to be intoxicated but smelled of alcohol. Anne explained that someone has reported a domestic dispute to the police department from this residence and that they were there to check upon the situation. Anne asks Mike if anyone was using any weapons. Mike denied this and said that Lilly was inside the house, ironing clothes. If Anne wanted, she could go and talk to Lilly.Justin stays with Mike while Anne enters the house and calls for Lilly. Lilly says, “Officer, he hit me on the head with his hand and I hit him with the iron.” As this was a mutual assault, Anne stops questioning Lilly and asks Mike what Lilly hit Johnny with. Mike responds, “With the iron.”Anne asks Lilly where Johnny is and she says he was in the dining room. Anne asks Lilly if Johnny has any weapons. Lilly says she did not think he did or at least he did not when he hit her in the head. Anne stays with Mike and Lilly while Justin cautiously enters the house to discover Johnny in fetal position under the dining table.When Justin first approaches him, Johnny is unresponsive but slowly becomes responsive. Justin notices a large contusion on the left side of Johnny’s face when he rolls over to look at Justin. Justin calls for an ambulance, as Johnny was not in a position to answer any questions due to the injury on his head and the possible effects of the shock.Anne continues to question Mike, “Who struck whom first?” Mike responds, “Johnny hit Lilly like he always does when he drinks Jack Daniels and beer, and then Lilly really got mad at Johnny, hit him with the iron, and went back to ironing. I don’t know where Johnny went after that because I was on the couch watching TV and drinking beer.” Anne then asks Mike, “How many times did Lilly hit Johnny with the iron?” Mike responds, “Only once that I saw.”Anne further asks, “How many times did Johnny strike Lilly?” Mike states, “Twice that I saw.”Anne asks how much had they been drinking. Mike responds, “Johnny had been drinking about 4 or 5 bottles of beers and Jack Daniels, Lilly did not drink at all, and I only had half a bottle of beer.”Johnny was taken to the hospital to have the contusion checked. When Johnny was stable, he was questioned and advised of his rights. He describes that he was angry because Lilly did not come home at 4:00 p.m., and he was hungry. He admitted that he had been drinking and struck his wife. The next thing he knew was that he was at the hospital.Submission Details:a minimum of 250 words, post your response to the following questions in the Discussion Area:In this situation, who is the victim and who is the defendant? What are the reasons for your choice?What rights are victims permitted under the law of your state? Use examples to support your response.How should the prosecution proceed in this case?What are the possible penalties that can be imposed in this case?

How effective each party’s goals are likely to be in mobilizing voters to support the party’s candidates on the national level.

Week 5 discussion Question 1 Party Platforms and Winning Elections Political parties mobilize voters to win elections and implement policy goals. Parties use their stated policy goals (i.e., their platforms) as a way to mobilize voter support. Generally, in order to be successful in a two-party system, parties must have policy goals across a broad range of issue areas to appeal to a broad range of voters. Before writing your initial post, review the assigned resources, which can be downloaded from your online course.For this discussion, you will identify one issue area that you want investigate. Use the assigned resources required for this discussion to gather information about the goals and proposals, in that issue area, of three political parties – the Democratic and Republican parties and a third party.In your initial post of at least 200-250 words, summarize each of the three parties’ policy goals in your issue area. Compare and contrast the parties’ goals in that area. Evaluate each party’s goals from two perspectives: a. Your own political philosophy, values or ideology. b. How effective each party’s goals are likely to be in mobilizing voters to support the party’s candidates on the national level. In making your assessment from this perspective, consider what influence the factors which underlie the two-party system have on each party’s ability to use its policy proposals to generate voter support. Justify your conclusions with facts and persuasive reasoning. Fully respond to all parts of the question. Write in your own words. Support your position with APA citations to two or more of the assigned resources required for this discussion. Please be sure that you demonstrate understanding of these resources, integrate them into your argument, and cite them properly. By Day 7, respond to at least two of your classmates’ initial posts. Your peer responses each must be at least 75 words. They must demonstrate critical thinking (e.g., ask a relevant question about your peer’s post while explaining why your question is significant, or state a perspective that contrasts with your peer’s while explaining or justifying your position).

Where should terrorists stand trial—within the traditional federal and state court systems, in a military tribunal, or in a special terrorism court?

NO PLAGIARISM AND APA STYLE PLS!Reading Assignment:Bush v. Obama – Detainee Policy Post-911Executive Order 13492Preventive Detention in the War on TerrorWhere should terrorists stand trial—within the traditional federal and state court systems, in a military tribunal, or in a special terrorism court?This is the primary question that you are tasked with answering in this assignment. This question has created a lively and ongoing debate amongst attorneys, judges, legislators, the military, and homeland security policy makers. Your task is to research this subject, make a recommendation, and then support that recommendation through your research. Review the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005 and the Military Commission Act of 2006 for background on this matter.Your discussion should include the characteristics of all of the proposed options before your recommendation. In addition to recommending one of the choices listed in the primary task question, your recommendation should describe whether there needs to be any changes made to your particular choice. For example, if you choose military tribunals, please discuss whether there are any changes necessary to the military tribunal format as a venue for terrorism trials.Key Assignment Guidelines:Address the following in 1,250–1,500 words:Is terrorism a political act, an act of war, or a violation of criminal law? Explain.In whatever system you recommend, should the trials be public or held in secret? Fully justify your response.What relationship if any, should your proposed solution have with the terrorism court established by Congress in the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act? Explain.With respect to where the U.S. should try suspected terrorists, should domestic terrorists and foreign terrorists be treated differently? Explain.If yes, how should they be treated differently? Explain.If no, why should they not be treated differently? Explain.What have other countries done that might inform the U.S. how better to handle this problem? Use external research to support your arguments.You must support your recommendation with a minimum of 4 legitimate sources.Be sure to reference all sources using APA style.

Provide an analysis of whether or not you agree with the author of this article, and assess what can be learned from past health reform efforts that can help improve the U.S health system in the future.

Primary Discussion Response is due by Friday This is DB no header is needed400 words that respond to the following questions with your thoughts, ideas, and comments. This will be the foundation for future discussions by your classmates. Be substantive and clear, and use examples to reinforce your ideas.*Locate a recent peer-reviewed article from a health care journal that reports on how well the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) is working. You can use the CTU online library and course reading materials to locate sources of articles about the PPACA.*Provide an analysis of whether or not you agree with the author of this article, and assess what can be learned from past health reform efforts that can help improve the U.S health system in the future.

research and discuss the differences that leaders would have to navigate in approach and adapting to different standards of behavior and culture within the countries.

Leadership varies widely by culture and personality. An international organization with locations in several countries must balance the local customs and cultures with those of the primary culture of the organizations’ headquarters. Using the Germany as the headquarters of an international Internet retail organization serving the USA and Canada research and discuss the differences that leaders would have to navigate in approach and adapting to different standards of behavior and culture within the countries.

State the legislation name and summarize the purpose of the bill

In order to influence policy, you have to understand how a bill is started, moves through the legislative system, and finally enacted. In this assignment, you will trace a piece of legislation from introduction to how it impacts health care or nursing practice. Develop the assignment as if it will be used during a presentation at a conference or poster presentation.Step 1: Identify a bill that relates to health care, a social issue, or nursing practice. You may select a federal or state billStep 2: Develop a poster presentation, infographic, FAQ document, or pamphlet which outlines how the bill was introduced and the process for approval by including answers to the following questions:State the legislation name and summarize the purpose of the billWho introduced/sponsored the bill?Where was it introduced? (U.S. Congress or a state legislature)Who helped to draft the legislation?Did nursing organizations such as the American Nurses Association identify support or opposition for the law? Look at two or more organizations, and you may need to review their lobbying information. If you can not find any evidence related to the legislation, list the organizations that you reviewed.Which congressional or legislature committees were involved?What happened to the legislation after it was introduced? Was it passed, enacted, or funded? If yes, when did it take effect?What is the impact on health care or nursing practice?

In On Liberty, how would you describe J.S. Mill’s central approach to questions of liberty?

1. In On Liberty, how would you describe J.S. Mill’s central approach to questions of liberty?2. In On Liberty, what does J.S. Mill mean by “opinion.” What is is concern about freedom of opinion. 3. In all of Mill’s writing, one senses a concern for equality (of all kinds) and for the good and welfare of society. Individual liberty and a community’s good are often in tension. How do you see Mill dealing with these tensions? Please respond to these questions using turabian formate, citing a minimum of 2 sources to support your discussion.

explain how Duska criticizes the claim that “Good ethics is good business.

Duska introduces one way to defend ethics in business, namely, to claim that good ethics is good business. Then he points out one difficulty with this line of thoughts. With your own words, explain how Duska criticizes the claim that “Good ethics is good business.no more than 600 wordsread the grading rubrics for reference

Describe a minimum of three specific examples of similarities and differences in healthcare reform policies in the two states.

Instructions: Please read carefully . I need the 4 pages and the powerpoint to be done. Part I: The world is becoming smaller and smaller and when companies look to expand they often look outside their original footprint. Rasmussen Healthcare Systems is looking to expand their system to another state. To help advise Rasmussen on this decision, you will write 4-5 pages that compare and contrast the healthcare reform policies of the state where you reside and another state of your choice. Please keep in mind the position and facility you selected. Make sure to include the following:Discuss the purpose of each state’s reform.Describe a minimum of three specific examples of similarities and differences in healthcare reform policies in the two states.Discuss in detail some of the ethical issues and moral disputes in each state’s reform.Discuss your recommendation on whether Rasmussen Healthcare Systems should expand to the second state.This portion of your assignment will require you to research and examine information from various sources. Use a minimum of five credible sources for your paper, with three being an academic source from the Rasmussen College Online Library (don’t forget to include in-text citations throughout your paper with paraphrasing or quoting).Make sure to include your APA formatted reference page.Example of Potential Useful WebsitesPart II: PowerPoint is typically the application of choice when conducting a meeting. There are many philosophies on how to create an effective PowerPoint, so do some research on the dos and don’ts. Then create a professional PowerPoint that you would present to the management team at your location that highlights your research. SkillSurfer in the online tutoring platform offers beginner, intermediate, and advanced tutorials on Microsoft Office products. Make sure to include the following in your PowerPoint:Length of PowerPoint is up to the student (Please make it so that when I present, it will last me about 5 mins long).Highlight specific policy changes in each state’s reform.Highlight each similarity and difference.Highlight your final recommendation on whether Rasmussen Healthcare Systems should expand to the other state.Use the Notes area on each slide as needed to expand on the key points. (Must have speaker notes).

What did the Saberness-Oxley Act demand of Boards and why?

Research several hospitals of your choice and identify how many Board members are on the Board and their length of appointment.As Boards are prohibited from managing, discuss the major duty of a Board. By what mechanism does a board understand the status of the hospital financially and operationally?What did the Saberness-Oxley Act demand of Boards and why?What is D/O (Directors/Officers) insurance and why is it needed? Sarbanes Oxley101. (2017) Welcome to Sarbanes Oxley 101. Retrieved from:http://www.sarbanes-oxley-101.comMerino, B. D., Mayper, A. G., & Tolleson, T. D. (2010). Neoliberalism, deregulation and sarbanes-oxley. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 23(6), 774-792. doi:http://dx.doi.org.southuniversity.libproxy.edmc.edu/10.1108/09513571011065871

× How can I help you?