Explain whether the fact that Hand was not a citizen of the United States affects his rights in relation to the Fifth Amendment right to remain silent.

Prior to beginning your written assignment, read the Fifth Amendment (Links to an external site.) article, the Competency to Waive Fifth Amendment Rights during Custodial Interview (Links to an external site.) article, You Might Have the Right to Remain Silent: An Erosion of the Fifth Amendment With the Use of Pre-arrest Silence (Links to an external site.) article, and the Miranda v. Arizona, 386 U.S. 436 (1966) court decision.Read the following case scenario:The former Sameer Shariff, a Saudi Arabian national who changed his name to “The Left Hand of God” and is known to his followers as “Hand,” is a suspected terrorist. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) agents believe that he is planning an imminent attack somewhere in Capital City. Under duress to prevent the attack, three DHS agents and three FBI agents storm into Hand’s house, burst into his bedroom, where he is in bed with a woman, and point shotguns at him. They demand to know what he is planning. No Miranda warnings are read. Hand tells them that he has hired Alex “Boom Boom” Jaxon, a known explosives expert, to plant a bomb in the Capital City Arena, with a timer to go off in three hours when the arena will be filled with over 20,000 people for a music concert.Jaxon is known to the police and is in Central City, which is two hours away. He is arrested by Central City police and calls his lawyer in Capital City, who tells him he will meet him there and to remain silent. The lawyer then tells Central City police that they are not to question Jaxon until they arrive in Capital City and the lawyer is present.Central City Police Officer McFadden drives Jaxon to Capital City. McFadden knows that DHS, FBI, and Capital City police are searching the arena, but McFadden is afraid they will not find the bomb in time. By the time that McFadden and Jaxon arrive in Central city, the concert hall is already full of audience members, and the show is set to begin in twenty minutes.McFadden, who knows Jaxon’s family from previous police contacts, tells Jaxon that his mother and two brothers, who have been surveilled by the police for the last six weeks, are at the concert and will die if the bomb goes off. Jaxon leads McFadden to the bomb, which is defused. A crying Jaxon states that his purpose was to kill infidels, but he would never harm his family.Research Fifth Amendment cases, including Miranda v. Arizona, 386 U.S. 436 (1966), which involves custodial interrogation and the right against self-incrimination.In your paper,Determine whether Hand was entitled to Miranda warnings.Explain whether the fact that Hand was not a citizen of the United States affects his rights in relation to the Fifth Amendment right to remain silent.Identify whether Hand’s questioning was custodial.Explain whether McFadden’s statement abouthis family constitutes custodial interrogation.Evaluate whether Hand’s statement can be used against him in a court of law.Explain whether Jaxon’s statement be used against him in a court of law.Determine whether Jaxon can testify against Hand.The Right to Remain Silent paperMust be 750 to 1,000 words in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the University of Arizona Global Campus Writing Center’s APA Style (Links to an external site.)Must include a separate title page with the following:Must utilize academic voice. See the Academic Voice (Links to an external site.) resource for additional guidance.Must include an introduction and conclusion paragraph. Your introduction paragraph needs to end with a clear thesis statement that indicates the purpose of your paper.Must use at least three court cases and one scholarly source.

What are the issues or problems facing the organization?

Select, research, and analyze a real organization (public, private, or non-profit). You may select an organization in which you have worked or have been a member. Examine a problem or issue of concern within that organization. Be selective in choosing an issue or problem within an organization, as a lack of depth in the issue itself will not be an acceptable excuse for lack of depth in the analysis. The purpose of this CLA is to apply both what has been learned in the course as well as your own independent research to problems in an organization of your choice. Focus on an issue or problem that the organization is facing and is relevant to the content of this course. It will likely take several reflection sessions to identify a problem or issue that can be clearly defined, is manageable in scope, and is relevant to the course, so start this CLA weeks before it is due. Gather information while supplementing this information with data from the media, the organization’s literature, and other secondary sources. You should identify a relatively recent problem to analyze (i.e., this should not be an historical account of a problem and the company’s solution). You should focus your analysis by applying the concepts from the course. While it is acceptable to incorporate several concepts from the course, please aim for depth rather than breadth regarding the use of course concepts. To meet these broad goals, answer the following questions in a 4 to 6 page APA formatted written report supported by at least three (3) academic sources:1) What are the issues or problems facing the organization?2) What theoretical concepts from this course can be applied to understand why this problem is occurring? 3) What recommendations can you offer to help improve organizational functioning?

Analyze the ramifications of the decision on the policymaking of the other two branches of government.

Application: SCOTUS and the Policy ProcessIn this Assignment, you select a Supreme Court case in a policy area of interest to you. Then, you analyze the majority and dissenting opinions and evaluate the future impact of the Court’s decision on the policymaking of the other two branches of government. Case Choices: U.S. v. Windsor (2013) (Defense of Marriage Act is unconstitutional), OR U.S. v. Nixon (1974) (sets limits to executive privilege)The Assignment:Write a 3- to 5-page double-spaced paper (not including title page, abstract and references) in which you do the following:Briefly describe the Supreme Court case you selected.Synthesize and summarize the majority and dissenting opinions of the Court in this case.Analyze the ramifications of the decision on the policymaking of the other two branches of government.Include three additional scholarly resources published in the last three years, in addition to citing this week’s Learning Resources.Cite all resources in APA format.

Explain the differences between Liberalism and Conservatism.

Explain the differences between Liberalism and Conservatism. Does ideology really make a difference in the United States today? Support your reasoning with examples. How does this impact American culture, government and politics in your opinion? You will be expected to support your discussion with primary texts and from pre-approved secondary sources (including, but not limited to the course text, online lectures, and a list of suggested online resources). Your paper should be 6-8 pages in length and include proper APA citation. Grading Criteria Provided an overview of the differences between Liberalism and Conservativism. Explained whether ideology makes a difference between Liberalism and Conservativism in the United States and supported your reasoning with examples. Supported your opinion of whether ideology impacts American culture, government, and politics. Used appropriate primary texts and pre-approved secondary sources to support your response. Used correct grammar and spelling. Conformed to APA citation and page length guidelines (6-8 pages).

Use a Sensitivity Analysis to show how it could help analyse the risk of the choice made by the Decision Tree.

BACKGROUNDA multinational clothing company is considering sponsoring an urban sport during the upcoming Paris Olympics. INSTRUCTIONSUse a SMART to help them decide which sport would be the best between Skateboarding, Sports Climbing and BMX FreestyleEstimate the return that the company might get from sponsoring these sports and use a Decision Matrix to help them decide if the SMART has given them the best decisionEstimate the probability of each sport getting media attention and use a Decision Tree to improve on the decision taken in the Decision MatrixThe company is worried that the US might not submit a team in your chosen sport and this could have a significant impact on the media attention received. Use a Sensitivity Analysis to show how it could help analyse the risk of the choice made by the Decision Tree.Along with each of the frameworks with the appropriate calculations, provide a question by question explanation of the steps taken and the conclusion reached.Formalities:· Wordcount: 1500-2000· Cover, Table of Contents, Conclusion· Font: Arial 12,5 pts. · Text alignment: Justified.

What is the state of the supply and demand for health care professionals in your area?

Need help with Week 3 Discussion Board. This is only a discussion board question and has to be atleast 250 words or more and not a actual paper. Willing to pay $5 to get it completed ASAP because it was orginally due on 9//e25/14. I need to get it in immediately so I can stil be on schedule with my class. I need the answer to coincide exactly with the question for the post. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me. This is Week 3 Discussion Baord Thread: Mounting research suggests that the demand for health care professionals is growing while supply is starting to decrease. However, the rates of supply and demand vary greatly depending on region of the country. Based on the reading for the week and your independent research:What is the state of the supply and demand for health care professionals in your area? Describe the concerns, interests, and influences of the health care work force in your area. Specifically, consider how working conditions, access to advanced technologies, and/or the health care consumer population might affect a health care professional’s desire to work in the area. In addition, conduct a search for future jobs in your intended field. What did your search reveal? How available are jobs in your area? How attractive are the available jobs to potential applicants?

How would you describe or define organized crime?

Write a 700- to 1,050-word paper, describing your personal perception of organized crime upon entering this course. Identify any assumptions on which your perception is based, and answer the following questions: Discuss the genesis of your ideas about organized crime. For example your ideas may have come from movies, your community, your job, etc.How would you describe or define organized crime?How does your perception compare to the definitions in the readings?What characteristics do you think are associated with organized criminal behavior?Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.

Describe each standardized rapid assessment instrument, and then indicate who created each one. Offer proof that each one is evidence-based.

InstructionsIdentify a behavioral health issue that is related to the topic you are focusing on throughout your MSW program. Then, identify at least three standardized rapid assessment instruments that you believe would effectively supplement a biopsychosocial assessment. Prepare a proposal for these instruments and be sure to address the following:Identify your focus topic and the behavioral health issue you are choosing for this assignment.Describe each standardized rapid assessment instrument, and then indicate who created each one. Offer proof that each one is evidence-based. Determine how each tool would be applied in a clinical setting. Justify the use of each tool, in addition to the standard biopsychosocial assessment. Provide a PDF copy of each assessment instrument.Support your assignment with at least three scholarly resources. In addition to these specified resources, other appropriate scholarly resources, including seminal articles, may be included.Length: 5-7 pages, not including title and reference pages

suggest two (2) applications for your strengths as a leader to situations that may arise within the sphere of public administration. Justify your response.

· From the weekly readings and first e-Activity, predict two to three (2-3) challenges that a public leader may face when moving from management to leadership. Recommend two to three (2-3) actions that a public leader can take in order to address these challenges. Provide a rationale for your response.· From the weekly readings and second e-Activity, suggest two (2) applications for your strengths as a leader to situations that may arise within the sphere of public administration. Justify your response.Weekly readings:· Personal LeadershipIf You Are Not Leading Yourself, How Can You Lead Others?Personal leadership can be somewhat elusive and is likely one of the more difficult aspects of leadership development. If you look up personal leadership models to get “the equation,” you will see some very complex models. Developing personal leadership doesn’t have to be complex, but it is always hard work.A good start toward developing your personal leadership is to develop truthful, thoughtful answers to the following four questions:Who are you?Aristotle said, “Knowing yourself is the beginning of all wisdom.” Probably the biggest hurdle to knowing who you are is to be honest with yourself. Everyone is good at many things but not good at everything. We all work better and prefer to interact in different ways. It is important to understand your preferences and how other people experience you. There are many readily available tools to help. The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) instrument is a great place to start building an understanding of who you are. The best practice is to go beyond the results and dig much deeper to understand the advantages and implications of your type.Where are you going?We all get out of life what our actions and decisions deliver. The difference is more related to horizon. If focused on the long term, your actions and decisions support your personal vision and direction in life. If not future-focused, your actions support the moment and not a goal. As my favorite philosopher, Yogi Berra, said, “If you don’t know where you’re going, you might wind up someplace else.” Developing a personal vision is difficult and is not likely to happen in one sitting.Who are you leading?Everyone has a surprisingly large group of constituents they can choose to lead. By not specifically defining who you are leading, you have made the default choice to not lead. Your constituent group should include people from all aspects of your life: career, family, community, friends, etc. On the flip side, it is also important to understand who is leading you. In some cases, as in a good interdependent relationship, it may be the same people you are leading. Knowing your mentors to being attuned to their guidance is important for your personal leadership development.What do they want?It is hard to lead people where they don’t want to go. That turns leadership into coercion. For effective personal leadership, we need to listen carefully and understand what our constituents want and where they want to go. That is not the same as caving in or compromising our goals. Leadership is a team sport.A few final points:· Keep Learning – Everything from formal education to just listening and responding to those around you will help improve your personal leadership. Investing in ourselves improves our personal leadership and leadership effectiveness for others.· Care Deeply – Personal opinion, I don’t believe you can lead anyone you don’t care about. After all, leadership is not about the leader, but about those they lead.· Never Give Up – It should go without saying, long-term perseverance and focus are musts. Along the way, plans will change and require adjustment but will not change who you are or where you are going.

In your opinion, are there still groups who are disenfranchised and are not considered as an equal source of power in our democracy?

This question is 75 words with references In 1787, the Constitution was drafted with a Preamble to explicitly state that the origins of power in this new democracy resided not with a king, but with the people. “We the People” has generally evolved over the years to include more than it did in the late 18th Century. In your opinion, are there still groups who are disenfranchised and are not considered as an equal source of power in our democracy? Write an essay of 750-1,000 words in which you reflect on the rights and freedoms guaranteed to you as an American citizen in the Bill of Rights. Include the following:Discuss which freedom guaranteed to you in the First Amendment to the Constitution is most relevant to you personally.Analyze and discuss the significance of the Bill of Rights and subsequent notable amendments to U.S. democracy.Discuss the process for amending the Constitution. Is this a “fair” process? Explain.AP format and references

× How can I help you?