Completely agree with the quote “Nothing has to stay the same. If a dogma is not working, no matter how strong and immovable it seems, you can cast it aside and start anew”

Completely agree with the quote “Nothing has to stay the same. If a dogma is not working, no matter how strong and immovable it seems, you can cast it aside and start anew” (Hari, 2015, p. 235). Our laws are a bit outdated and with to scientific method behind them, the drugs that are chosen to be illegal and the ones that aren’t, it is not based on any credible evidence, they aren’t illegal because they are worse for you, or the other way around they aren’t legal because they are better for you it’s all who they are associated with. The prohibition on something is never going to happen, all that will happen is cause a financial strain on the whole country because our prison will be bursting with people. This plays with the old saying if something is illegal people will want it more. Threaten drug addicts and impose severe pain on them if they continue, “this was the best way to make them wish to keep using drugs“ (Hari, 2015, p. 237).The decriminalization of drugs should be something that lawmakers should look at. Many drugs have been found to have medical use and that is why some drugs are now being legalized. This is related, in part, to evidence that drugs such as marijuana or heroin, which had been previously categorized as having no medicinal value, may have potential medical benefits (Hammond, 2020). Portugal has taken the leap of faith that no other country wanted to do and legalized all drugs. You cannot fight numbers, their drug use, drug crimes, and drug overdoses have decreased in impressive numbers which should open countries to trying the same thing. As the biggest consumer of Illicit drugs, the United States must try new tactics and take a page from Portugal the legalization of drugs might be a great option and Could also help our country financially with taxes just as alcohol helps.ReferencesHari, J. (2015). Chasing the scream: The first and last days of the war on drugs. Bloomsbury.Hammond, A. S., Dunn, K. E., & Strain, E. C. (2020). Drug legalization and decriminalization beliefs among substance-using and nonusing individuals. Journal of Addiction Medicine, 14(1), 56–62. https://doi.org/10.1097/adm.0000000000000542 Response ParametersPeer responses should be structured using the RISE model Initial peer responses should be 250 words in lengthResponses must be substantive and continue learning (avoid a simple “Good,” “Bad,” or “I agree” )Using APA format, continue to use sources from the text, lecture, or peer-reviewed articles to support your follow-up responses

Analyze research literature in relation to a meaningful and justified gap in research for the PhD dissertation.

To complete Chapter 2, you will need to:Analyze research literature in relation to a meaningful and justified gap in research for the PhD dissertation.Ground dissertation research in a theoretical/conceptual framework related to an identified social-educational problem. To complete Chapter 3, you will need to:Determine the approach to research methodology and design for the dissertation.Identify data sources to answer the research questions.Demonstrate alignment in research design.Justify choices and decisions regarding:MethodologyResearch questionsSample or participantsInstrumentationData sourcesData collectionData analysis plan (to demonstrate alignment and consistency among each element of the study)I NEED EACH CHAPTER TO CONTAIN AT LEAST 15 PAGES AND I NEED IT TO FLOW OFF OF CHAPTER 1

Identify which stakeholders you would involve and their roles in the evaluation process.

Utilization-focused evaluation is founded on the notion that an evaluation design must be responsive to the needs of those who will use its results. Other schools of thought may not view utilization as the driving force in the same way. Nonetheless, the point of all evaluation research is to have the findings used. For this Assignment, step back from the evaluation you have been planning for your Final Project, and think about how the results will be used. Submit a 2- to 3-page paper that addresses the following: Identify which stakeholders you would involve and their roles in the evaluation process. Identify what you see as each stakeholder’s interest in the program you selected, and in the evaluation results. Identify any ethical issues that should be considered. Determine whether you will be able to meet their needs with the evaluation you have planned so far. After thinking about your evaluation from various angles, analyze ways in which you envision the need for the evaluation and the end results being put to use. Explain any changes that this analysis suggests for the remaining sections of your design that you have already developed.

Explore the legal rights and responsibilities of the tenant and the landlord.

Larry Landlord has recently renovated an apartment and has put it on the market to be rented for $800.00 a month. Larry Landlord has been in business for approximately five (5) years and has had both positive and negative experiences with tenants. Larry Landlord is hoping to find a good, long-term tenant for his apartment. Roger Renter saw Larry’s sign for the apartment for rent and thought the location and the apartment would be perfect. Roger met Larry to look at the apartment and Roger fell in love with it. All of the interior fixtures had been replaced and the unit had a nice large closet. Roger noticed that although newly painted, the exterior of the apartment did show a little bit of wear. Because of the condition of the exterior of the building, Roger asked Larry about any roof leaks. Larry stated that he had never had a leak and was not aware of any leaks. Roger and Larry entered into a valid contract for the rental of the apartment. (Note: The issue of whether or not a contract exists is NOT part of this question. For purposes of this question assume the contract is valid and there are no issues with the contract.) Roger Renter was very happy in his new location; the apartment was quiet and the neighbors were friendly. Larry Landlord was also very happy because Roger Renter was a model tenant. Roger Renter paid on time and was quiet and respectful to other tenants. The part of the country where Roger rented was rainy in the summertime. Roger rented and moved into the apartment in October. In June, a tremendous rainstorm occurred and Roger’s roof began to leak. The leak was minor at first and Roger merely put a trash can under the leak and had no other issues that month. When handing over his monthly rent check, Roger told Larry about the small leak. Larry thanked Roger for letting him know about the leak and told Roger he would have it fixed. The next month the rains came again and the leak grew larger in Roger’s apartment. Roger was not home at the time of the rain and therefore the leak damaged some of Roger’s furniture. Roger called Larry to let him know that there was a leak and asked when it might be fixed. Roger also stated that he thought Larry had fixed the roof. Larry curtly stated, “When it rains, sometimes it pours. When it pours, sometimes it leaks.” Roger did not like Larry’s tone or response and called back to ask when the roof might be fixed. Larry stated, “When I get to it.” The following day, Roger sent Larry a note about the roof leak and asked Larry to please address the issue. The week before the rent was due, another rainstorm occurred and the leak was even larger. This time the leak damaged Roger’s clothing, furniture, and some precious items he had inherited from family members. Roger called Larry and asked Larry to fix roof immediately. Larry responded in a similar and condescending manner. Roger hung up the phone and threw his baseball bat against the wall, damaging the drywall and knocking out an electrical socket. Since it was the rainy season, Roger knew it would rain again and therefore simply moved his items away from the leak and did nothing to help mitigate the damage from the leaking roof. Larry came into the apartment to investigate the leak and found damage from not only the leak but also from the thrown baseball bat. Roger states that the baseball bat damage was a direct result of Larry’s inability to fix the leak based on his anger from Larry’s curt response. Suppose you are a mediator. In five to seven (5-7) pages discuss the rights and responsibilities of the landlord and the tenant in which you: Explore the legal rights and responsibilities of the tenant and the landlord. Decide whether or not the landlord and / or the tenant had a legal duty to mitigate damages. Determine whether or not Larry has legal grounds to evict Roger. Explain why or why not. Describe whether or not Roger has a legal obligation to pay for the damage he caused and determine whether or not Larry would be liable for any direct damage. Support each response with facts presented in the scenario.Use proper legal terminology throughout your responses. Use at least three (3) quality academic resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do not qualify as quality academic resources.Format your assignment according to the following formatting requirements:Typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides.Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page is not included in the required page length.Include a reference page. Citations and references must follow APA format. The reference page is not included in the required page length.

Explain appropriate laws, regulations, and policies for a complicated or difficult procurement.

Annotate two points of interest from your readings this week by Thursday of this week. Your initial post should be at least 250 words. Please respond to at least 3 other students. Responses should be a minimum of 100 words and can include direct questions.Note: Please bear in mind throughout the course the “theoretical” position you hold within the organization is that of a Program or Contract Manager as you make your recommendations.Purpose of this assignment:Explain appropriate laws, regulations, and policies for a complicated or difficult procurement.Links to help with this are:Bradley Fighting VehicleThis video offers a perspective on the Bradley Fighting Vehicles design and development. It offers a perspective from how a program can start in one manner but end up as something completely different.Link: http://youtu.be/AHSjpFUKQR4Videos about Programs that have achieved IOC:Link: http://www.af.mil/News/ArticleDisplay/tabid/223/Article/494300/awacs-upgrade-achieves-initial-operational-capability.aspxLink: https://www.f35.com/news/detail/department-of-defense-announces-f-35-ioc-dates-for-all-services/Link: http://www.navy.mil/submit/display.asp?story_id=77993Video about the Trusted Traveler ProgramLink: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ettaBOW4UEATed Talk about Difficult NegotiationLink: http://www.ted.com/talks/william_ury?language=enCongressional Research Report on Defense Acquisitions: How DOD acquirers weapon systems and recent efforts to reform the process.Link: http://fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/RL34026.pdfThis is a good document about how process reform is being done currently.Research in the library or the web as well to find material that could support your position.Instructions: Your initial post should be at least 250 words. Please respond to at least 3 other students. Responses should be a minimum of 100 words and include direct questions.

From your research, prioritize the leadership tasks that a leader must possess during an emergency.

“Leadership in Managing Disasters and Crises” Please respond to the following:From your research, prioritize the leadership tasks that a leader must possess during an emergency. Next, speculate on an example or scenario where weak leadership could have made matters worse during an emergency situation.From the e-Activity, give your opinion on how well your selected leader performed leadership tasks and response to the disaster or crisis during the emergency situation. Provide a rationale for your response.

What evidence do you see of transfer of knowledge and skills?

Select a unit for preschoolers that you have taught in the past. If you are not currently teaching, locate a unit (ask a teacher friend if you can borrow one of theirs, find one online, et cetera). Analyze the unit in terms of acquisition, meaning, and transfer.In your post, indicate the learning standards addressed in the unit. Address the following:What evidence do you see of transfer of knowledge and skills? What are the big ideas that are being taught in the unit? How will students be able to use what they learned in future learning or in real-world situations?What evidence do you see of meaning-making? What important understandings will students take from their interaction with the content?What evidence do you see of acquisition? What building blocks of knowledge and skills do you see that support meaning-making?What suggestions would you make to improve each of these areas in the unit you selected?What question remains for you about acquisition, meaning, and transfer?

Write an essay of 700 words about the impact of media owners on media.

Media Ownership AssignmentWrite an essay of 700 words about the impact of media owners on media. How does the free market affect a free press? Why doesn’t the free market guarantee a free press. Name some major problems. How do small budgets affect the quality of news and media industry in general? How can we revitalize a democratic free press? Please base your essay on the information in the attached chapter.

Consider the current issue of organizational structure. Do you believe that Public Allies should be centralized or decentralized? Why?

Public Allies: Building the Infrastructure for GrowthAccording to the Bridgespan Group (2004):Strong support from AmeriCorps, fees from organizations that sponsor allies, and clearly documented program results have propelled the growth of Public Allies. Over the years, Public Allies has worked hard to find the appropriate level of control and decentralization with its branches. Recently, the organization decided to transfer all its sites to a licensee model in which organizations or universities manage local programs, relieving some of the administrative and financial burden on local sites. Public Allies is planning a new, lower cost model and a more targeted approach to site development.Click here to view the complete case study.TasksTo complete this assignment, answer the following comprehensively in an essay format, utilizing additional literature to assist with your knowledge and understanding of course concepts and additional scholarly sources for citations within your paper:Consider the current issue of organizational structure. Do you believe that Public Allies should be centralized or decentralized? Why?Discuss the role of the director of the national board in this conflict. Given the different levels of board maturity, what could the board members have done differently?Submit a minimum of six sources, including your course textbook.DeliverableSubmit your response in a 3- to 4-page Microsoft Word document.

How has a continuous strategy of marketing innovation proved successful for USA Today and USAToday.com?

2Q. How has a continuous strategy of marketing innovation proved successful for USA Today and USAToday.com? Do you believe that USA Today is well positioned for the future? Explain. 3Q. What are the SWOT implications for USA Today as it looks toward its future? What strengths and opportunities can USA Today leverage as it looks for a competitive advantage in the distribution of news and information?4Q. Based on USA Today’s experiences with print and online news, evaluate the long-term potential of printed news and the newspaper publishing industry. Do you believe printed newspapers will continue to survive despite digital competition?

× How can I help you?