write, in the form of an essay, a 5,000 word critical literature review based on a synthesis of business practice and academic theory on an individual topic of your choice.
You are required to write, in the form of an essay, a 5,000 word critical literature review based
on a synthesis of business practice and academic theory on an individual topic of your choice.
Your essay should include:
An appropriate title
An abstract (maximum 300 words) and a set of related keywords.
An introduction justifying the contemporary nature (importance) of the topic selected.
A coherent and sectionalized structure covering the chosen topic (and title) and associated
sub-themes.
A summary/conclusion section including linkages between business practice and academic
theory.
A reference list and associate application using the APA referencing convention
Describe which security principles you would use to immediately correct the issue. Explain your reasoning in detail.
Description
Last night one of your security technicians discovered a massive spike in the amount of data leaving your
corporate network. After careful examination, it was discovered that three systems were sending data to an
unrecognized IP address in China.
Describe which security principles you would use to immediately correct the issue. Explain your reasoning in
detail.
Critically discuss the advantages and limitations of the Planning model you selected in comparison to other models, using peer-reviewed literature.
Assignment Guidance:
Using a planning framework, design a health promotion intervention for a specific group focused on
Mental health and wellbeing
Word Count: 3000 words, including tables and figures, excluding references.
Summative Report:
Structure – use these headings:
Introduction
Background
Planning model
Intervention
Critique of the Planning model
Conclusion
You can use figures and tables within your assignment. Remember to give them titles and numbers, to refer them by Table or Figure number in the text, and describe their key aspects within the report.
You must not copy and paste copyrighted images from datasets or online sources.
Potentially useful figures / tables
Determinants of your specific health topic mapped to the Rainbow model or other suitable framework
Action areas of the Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion
The Precede Proceed model or a logic model applied to your intervention, to the show the process, the impact, and outcome evaluations
Guidance (suggested word count, to give an indication of relative importance)
Introduction (100 words)
Specify your target topic, group / community, and setting
Briefly outline what the report will do – a sentence or two on each subsection.
Background (400 words)
Define the health topic, using a reference. Describe the epidemiology and current prevalence in your target group and target setting (place, area, country) using reliable surveillance and / or peer-reviewed data. Explain its evidence-based determinants for your target group (consider doing this within the Rainbow mode or other social determinants of health model).
A figure might be useful here, mapping the determinants of your health topic for your group in their setting, mapped to a recognised model.
Explain the evidence-based harms of the problem on your target group, to justify why an intervention is needed.
Explain what health promotion is (aims, perspectives, strategies), and why it is a good fit to your topic. Identify the most relevant WHO Charter for your topic.
A figure might be useful here, showing the action areas of the Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion
Critically discuss the needs assessment of your choice for your target group and setting. Ensure you use peer-reviewed evidence and / or surveillance data to support this.
Planning model (700 words)
Explain what planning models are and why they are suitable to your topic.
Identify, justify, and explain the planning model you will use
A figure may be useful here, to illustrate the phase-by-phase / step-by-step process from the target problem to the expected outcomes. e.g. The Precede-Proceed model or a logic model applied to your intervention, to show the process, the impact, and outcome evaluations
Explain what would happen within each phase of the planning model. How will the needs assessment be done (what type of data will you collect, and how e.g which valid and reliable measures or psychometrics are suitable), what you expect to find based on the relevant peer-reviewed literature and surveillance data, and how the identified factors in the health problem would be prioritised. Include health behaviour / promotion models, as appropriate, to explain the target problem and mechanisms of change in theory. Specify the required resources, and any disparity-based barriers to implementation.
Intervention (700 words)
Based on your planning model assessments, specify the targets for the intervention, and the strategies and processes you will use to reduce the problem. Specify how the health behaviour / promotion model(s) underpin your intervention design, and justify it / them as a good fit for the target problem using critically described peer-reviewed evidence.
Work through each phase of the Planning model, ensuring you include all the components that culminate in a clearly specified evidence-based intervention, and how the process, and short, medium, and long term outcome evaluations would be conducted (specify suitable data collection methods, reliable and valid psychometrics, surveillance data, etc that fit to the needs assessment and target problem)
Critique of the Planning model (1000 words)
Critically discuss the advantages and limitations of the Planning model you selected in comparison to other models, using peer-reviewed literature.
Critically discuss the intervention you proposed, using peer-reviewed literature.
Critically discuss the advantages and limitations of the Health Promotion and Behaviour Promotion model(s) you selected in comparison to other models, using peer-reviewed literature.
Explain the ethical considerations, to ensure no iatragenic (accidental harm) effects or worsening of existing disparities.
Conclusion (100 words)
Briefly reflect upon the choices made and acquired learning.
Calculate the value of a two-period European-style put option on the stock that has an exercise price of $50.
Q5. Consider a stock currently trading at $50. The periodically compounded interest rate is 3%. Suppose that U = 1.3, and D = 0.8. Calculate the value of a two-period European-style put option on the stock that has an exercise price of $50. Also, determine if early exercise would make economic sense.
(25 marks)
Describe the concept of arbitrage, and provide an example when a company has conducted arbitrage in the past.
Q4. Describe the concept of arbitrage, and provide an example when a company has conducted arbitrage in the past.
(5 marks)
Critically evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of the Value at Risk (VaR) risk measurement?
Q3. Critically evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of the Value at Risk (VaR) risk measurement? Then, compare and contrast the marginal VAR (M-VaR), incremental VaR (I-VAR), and the Component Var (C-VaR).
(15 marks)
Describe and explain how a company can manage working capital?
Q2 Describe and explain how a company can manage working capital? Provide the equation that is used to calculate the net working capital and why it is useful for a company for a company to calculate net working capital? Please give a one real world example of a company managing their working capital. (15 marks)
calculate the correlation between Equities and Commercial Property. Comment on the implications of your correlation calculation if you wanted to diversify a portfolio which contained both 50% weight in commercial property and 50% in equities.
Q1a) An investor has collated nine returns from their portfolio. Calculate the following for each asset class (Commercial Property, Equities and Corporate bonds); mean, median, mode, variance, standard deviation. Show your workings and briefly comment on your results
Table 1. Returns in 2022 for Commercial Property, Equities, and Government Bonds
Commercial Property Equities Government bonds 8% 12% 4% 10% 14% 3% -12% 19% 2% 4% -15% 1% 6% -1% 4% 7.5% 0% 5% 3% 15% 8% 5% 14% 6% 4% 3% 4%
(15 marks)
Q1b) Using the information in Table 1, calculate the correlation between Equities and Commercial Property. Comment on the implications of your correlation calculation if you wanted to diversify a portfolio which contained both 50% weight in commercial property and 50% in equities.
Provide an explanation about the Supreme Court’s role and importance in the federal court system as well as how cases make it to the Supreme Court.
Description
Please do not use Surname in top right use Sands..Step 1: Background Information
Review the textbook chapter on the court system, view the video below, and view the Oyez link below.
Textbook: Chapter 13 on the court system, pages 485 – 508, specifically 498 – 508
The Lost Art of Democratic Debate (TED Talk)
Judicial Decisions: Crash Course Government and Politics
Oyez: Supreme Court cases
Google search as needed for additional information
Step 2: Select the Paper Topic
Select a Supreme Court case that’s either currently being decided or has been decided in the past two years.
Step 3: Analyze and Evaluate
After selecting a case, conduct research to fully understand the facets of the case.
Step 4: Write the Paper
Using the background resources provided in addition to researching a Supreme Court case of your choosing,
write a two page paper (Times New Roman, 12-point font, double spaced) that shows you understand the
significance of a case that makes it to the Supreme Court.
Your paper should consist of at least 5 paragraphs (totaling 1.5-2 pages) following this format:
Introduction Paragraph: Summarizes the purpose of the paper, uses an attention-getting device (PDF) Click for
more options an attention-getting device (PDF) – Alternative Formats to draw the reader in.
Paragraphs 2-3: Provide an explanation about the Supreme Court’s role and importance in the federal court
system as well as how cases make it to the Supreme Court.
Paragraph 4: Describe and analyze a selected Supreme Court case
Describe the case (who/what constitutes either side of the case – who is being represented? What are both sides
arguing?
Describe why the case made it to the Supreme Court.
Explain the outcome of the case if available, including the precedent that was set as a result. If the outcome is
not available yet, predict which side may win and the precedent that will be set as a result.
Conclusion paragraph: Summarize the paper and tie it all together.
Citations: At the end of your paper, create a citation for each source you USED in the paper. You may use either
APA or MLA style (APA is preferred).
Refresher: How to Write a College-Level Pap
Explain why the investigation of power remains a fundamental part of sociological research
Topic:
Explain why the investigation of power remains a fundamental part of sociological research
2 pages + well-structured + cited references
Description
In essay format, using examples drawn from course readings (listed below) and current events, please explain
why the investigation of power remains a fundamental part of sociological research. The philosopher, Bertrand
Russell (1938), notes that “the fundamental concept in social science is power, in the same sense in which
energy is the fundamental concept in physics”. The essay should be somewhere between 2-5 pages long, doublespaced. Quotes should be cited in the text, APA format to be used.
Readings:
Bertrand Russell, Power https://russell-j.com/beginner/POWER1938-TEXT.HTM
“Panopticism” by Foucault
“The two factors of a commodity” by Marx
“Commodity fetishism” by Marx
The Stanford University Experiment Assignment