develop a Leadership Philosophy statement as an appendix to your evaluation
In earlier modules you explored the influence of self-awareness on your leadership style and established that a clear understanding of your abilities, motivation, and goals provides a firm foundation for leading others. Leadership studies demonstrate that the most effective leaders know how to draw upon self-leadership skills to in turn motivate and lead others to expand their strengths to ultimately better serve the goals of an organization. For this assignment you will look at a leadership example from contemporary media and evaluate how well the particular leader exemplifies the qualities of effective and ethical leadership. Then, you will compose your own Leadership Philosophy statement to articulate the qualities that will make you an effective leader of people and organizations.Part 1:For Part 1, select a relevant and topical leadership issue from the contemporary news media that revolves around ethics and ethical decision making. Topics must be approved by your instructor. Once approved, research the situation and gather data in order to evaluate the dynamics of the situation. Write an evaluation (500-750 words) of the situation that addresses the following:Conclude by justifying whether or not you think this leader is effective and if they acted ethically.Next, imagine yourself as a practitioner of servant leadership. You have been appointed into the leadership role in this same circumstance. Explain how the situation would be different. Address the four criteria listed above in your discussion.Part 2:For Part 2, develop a Leadership Philosophy statement as an appendix to your evaluation in Part 1. Begin by reviewing your self-assessments results from Module 2 and reflecting on what you have learned about effective leadership in the course. Keep in mind that one’s Leadership Philosophy is a unique statement that encapsulates your own view of leadership so the final product may vary; however, your statement should incorporate the following:Your goal is to create a distinctive statement (250-500 words) that incorporates the above elements. The end product should clearly articulate how you view yourself as a leader and how others would view you as a leader. It should also make clear how you can contribute to the success of other people and an organization as a whole.
Create at least two different types of media methods for the product or service.
Marketing paper Assignment Steps Complete a minimum 700-word product strategy in Microsoft® Word. Incorporate a product strategy that addresses the following: • Select a product strategy. Address at least three areas of the product lifecycle (NPI, growth, maturity, and decline). • Create at least two different types of media methods for the product or service. One method must be print and the other must be non-print, both of which highlight your product or service. In your assignment, include 2-3 sentences about each media method (i.e., one paragraph of what you would do, but not how to do it). For example, (this cannot be used in this assignment), a non-print media method would be a Facebook campaign that provides users with a reward for each review (positive or negative) about the use/appearance/price/etc. of the product or service. • Determine how you will measure the marketing activities (i.e., what metrics will be used to determine success or failure). • Address three elements of the following Product and Promotion List: -Integrated marketing communication -Advertising strategy/objectives -Push and pull -Media strategy -Advertising execution -Direct marketing -Public relations/strategies -Positioning The plan will be a continuation of the global or multi-regional company you chose in Week 1. This will be incorporated into your overall marketing plan for Week 6. Note: Charts/graphs/tables do not count toward the word count. Cite a minimum of three peer-reviewed references. Format your assignment consistent with APA guidelines.
In a 2-3 page paper, analyze how to ethically guide your life.
It is obvious that, objectively speaking, there is no ethical bright line test for society to follow. Whether dealing in Business, Law, Journalism, etc. no two realms have the same ethical guidelines. What is accepted in one faction of society is not always accepted and/or ethical in another faction. Moreover, what is accepted in one situation is not always then again accepted in a subsequent similar situation. What then is the bottom line? The bottom line is – there is no accepted bottom line. We all come to our own ethical make-up based on the positions we hold, the religions we hold ourselves out to be and the experiences we have live through. What is your ethical make up? In a 2-3 page paper, analyze how to ethically guide your life. Do so through determining a set of standards to live by. Furthermore, differentiate where those standards derived from. Finally, conclude how you know these standards are right and/or wrong. Please be sure to give at least five examples of ethical standards in which everyone should live by. Be sure to use proper APA formatting including a cover page. Save your assignment as a Microsoft Word document.
What are some physical security flaws (if any) do you think would be an option or not relevant?
Develop an attack plan that covers these criteria: 1. Choose a company/organization for analysis/attack. 2. Give summary information about the organization. Remember, you have to think like an intruder what information do you think would be relevant? 3.Find tools on the web that could help you find information about systems/networks, etc.. that could be used to find vulnerable points. Remember, you have to find this info, use tools to look for more information and vulnerabilities that you could exploit. Name these tools and what they can do to help. 4. Is social engineering an option here? What methods could you use to gather sensitive information? What questions might you ask? What kind of messages could you send? What are some physical security flaws (if any) do you think would be an option or not relevant?5.This outline can be presented in a PowerPoint presentation, complete with illustrations, and references. For illustrations, screenshots can be used to display various techniques you might employ. 6.This presentation should be at least 12-15 slides, any style you wish and must have references to information you use.
What type of organizational structure would work the best for Nike?
What type of organizational structure would work the best for Nike? Explain your answer thoroughly. Draw (yes, draw a picture) the organizational structure you have chosen for question #1 – be as complete as possible. What improvements could be made to this structure? Explain your choices.
Identify and explain what factors influence who will be your friend.
Assignment 1: Evaluating Cognitive Development1. Explain and give examples of characteristics of concrete operational thought according to Piaget.2. Discuss one to three findings that challenge Piaget’s theory about cognitive development. Assignment 2: Evaluating Socioemotional Development1. Identify and explain what factors influence who will be your friend. Describe several of (hint there are six) functions of friendship.
Is the criminal justice system fair and competent enough to allow for the death penalty? Are the problems with the system fixable or not?
Thinking Critically About the Cameron Todd Willingham Case OPTION 1: Which do you think played a greater role in the outcome of the Willingham case: cognitive biases (flaws in thinking, often unconscious) or agendas (personal, political, or financial motives behind an action)?OPTION 2: Based on what you learned from the Willingham case and the other cases we read about, does emotion help or hinder our critical thinking? Consider your own emotions and the emotions of various people involved in the case.
OPTION 3: What would you say in response to the following people who still believe in Willingham’s guilt? These are David Martin, Willingham’s lawyer, who said in the film, “He really did set that fire and kill those kids”; fire investigator Douglas Fogg, who said Willingham “was 100 percent guilty”; He was as guilty as the day he was born”; and Rick Perry, who argued that Willingham was “a bad man”; who cursed at his ex-wife just before he was executed.
OPTION 4: Based on what you have learned from the Willingham case and the other cases we read about, is the criminal justice system fair and competent enough to allow for the death penalty? Are the problems with the system fixable or not?
write a 1-2 page reflection about how attractions will be impacted by the current pandemic and comment on how the future of the theme park industry will be in your opinion?
Go to library.sfsu.edu in the search box type: “Competitive strategies in the US theme park industry: a popular media perspective” or try the below linkhttps://sfstate-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/f/153kjhr/TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1108_IJCTHR_02_2015_0009HERE IS MORE RESOURCES THAT MIGHT BE HELP YOU:https://ilearn.sfsu.edu/ay2122/pluginfile.php/594961/mod_resource/content/0/HTM_424_F17_f1%20%281%29%20%281%29.pdfhttps://sfsu.mediasite.com/Mediasite/Play/806c74def751402eaf2ce43467374ce31d?authTicket=2f61d223bc774ae1bbc0ea037cf47c31After reading the article, making other research from the internet and highlighting the important points for you write a 1-2 page reflection about how attractions will be impacted by the current pandemic and comment on how the future of the theme park industry will be in your opinion?
What were the major changes made to tax provisions by the Act?
Overview: The changes made by the Tax Cut and Jobs Act, 2017 to the tax provisions changed the tax rate for 2018. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act took effect on January 1, 2018, and will substantially impact taxpayers through 2025. Instructions: Review the Act and address the questions below. Your responses need to be supported by relevant well-researched facts. 1. What were the major changes made to tax provisions by the Act? 2. What impact does it currently have on our GDP and government’s budget? 3. How have the changes in taxes affected you personally? If you feel that it has not affected you personally, please state that in your response and explain why. 4. Who benefits from the changes in tax provisions? Does it favor one group over another? 5. What changes do you agree and disagree with?
Write a 4–6-page policy proposal and practice guidelines for improving quality and performance associated with the benchmark metric underperformance you advocated for improving
Write a 4–6-page policy proposal and practice guidelines for improving quality and performance associated with the benchmark metric underperformance you advocated for improving in Assessment 1.In advocating for institutional policy changes related to local, state, or federal health care laws or policies, health leaders must be able to develop and present clear and well-written policy and practice guideline proposals that will enable a team, a unit, or an organization as a whole to resolve relevant performance issues and bring about improvements in the quality and safety of health care. This assessment offers you an opportunity to take the lead in proposing such changes.As a master’s-level health care practitioner, you have a valuable viewpoint and voice to bring to discussions about policy development, both inside and outside your care setting. Developing policy for internal purposes can be a valuable process toward quality and safety improvement, as well as ensuring compliance with various health care regulatory pressures. This assessment offers you an opportunity to take the lead in proposing such changes.Competency MapUse this online tool to track your performance and progress through your course.
