Discuss which cluster the primary diagnosis belongs to.
Analyze and apply critical thinking skills in the psychopathology of mental health patients and provide treatment and health promotion while applying evidence-based research. | |
| Scenario: | Vee is a 26-year-old African-American woman who presents with a history of non-suicidal self-injury, specifically cutting her arms and legs, since she was a teenager. She has made two suicide attempts by overdosing on prescribed medications, one as a teenager and one six months ago; she also reports chronic suicidal ideation, explaining that it gives her relief to think about suicide as a “way out.”When she is stressed, Vee says that she often “zones out,” even in the middle of conversations or while at work. She states, “I don’t know who Vee really is,” and describes a longstanding pattern of changing her hobbies, style of clothing, and sometimes even her job based on who is in her social group. At times, she thinks that her partner is “the best thing that’s ever happened to me” and will impulsively buy him lavish gifts, send caring text messages, and the like; however, at other times she admits to thinking “I can’t stand him,” and will ignore or lash out at him, including yelling or throwing things. Immediately after doing so, she reports feeling regret and panic at the thought of him leaving her. Vee reports that, before she began dating her current partner, she sometimes engaged in sexual activity with multiple people per week, often with partners whom she did not know. |
| Questions: | Remember to answer these questions from your textbooks and NP guidelines. At all times, explain your answers. 1. Describe the presenting problems.2. Generate a primary and differential diagnosis using the DSM5 and ICD 10 codes.3. Discuss which cluster the primary diagnosis belongs to.4. Formulate and prioritize a treatment plan. |
Submission Instructions:
· Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources.
What made this case study a digital reputation issue?
Choose three case studies from Michael Fertik’s book, Reputation Economy, that feature individual or corporate reputation issues in the digital world, and write the following for each:
1. What made this case study a digital reputation issue?
2. What were some of the ways the issues were mitigated or resolved? If they were not resolved, what is the long-term impact?
3. What is the primary lesson to be learned from this case study?
4. Are there any correlations you can make to your own personal profile(s) or to those of your company? Please describe.
Deliverable
Write a minimum of 2–4 sentences for each question, per case. This should equate to approximately 2-3 pages of content. This assignment should be completed in a Word document using 12-point Times New Roman or Calibri font.
Select three artworks that illustrate the development of cubism. Identify specific phases of cubism.
Development of Cubism
Select three artworks that illustrate the development of cubism. Identify specific phases of cubism.
Include the following aspects in the discussion:
- Titles of three artworks
- Artists’ names, dates and media
- Describe the development of the style of cubism
- Apply the visual elements
What does the speaker’s experience mean to you?
For this assignment, you will be writing a reflection paper on one of the following TED talks. In the Self Reflection assignment, examine the effect of course material on your assumptions and knowledge about the role of culture or your everyday interactions with others from a different culture, religion, or socio-economic group. While the reflection is subjective, the paper should be an integration of your experience and the course readings.
Adichie, C. (2009, July). Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie: The danger of a single story [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.ted.com/talks/chimamanda_adichie_the_danger_of_a_single_story
Pariser, E. (2011, March). Eli Pariser: Beware online “filter bubbles” [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.ted.com/talks/eli_pariser_beware_online_filter_bubbles
Rosling, H. & Rosling, O. (2014, June). Hans Rosling and Ola Rosling: How not to be ignorant about the world [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.ted.com/talks/hans_and_ola_rosling_how_not_to_be_ignorant_about_the_world
Association for Psychological Science. (2015, January 29). Transgender kids show consistent gender identity across measures. Retrieved from https://www.psychologicalscience.org/news/releases/transgender-kids-show-consistent-gender-identity-across-measures.html
After referring the TED talk, respond to the following questions.
What does the speaker’s experience mean to you?
What 5 theories or course concepts help you to understand your experience?
What you have learned from the experience?
How might you move forward from this point?
How might the experience affect your thinking and practice?
How can you apply these new ideas in the future?
Identify 3 opportunities for future growth or engagement.
Are there measures that can be taken when communicating nonverbally to improve self-presentation, impression management, attributional inferences, and cognitive biases?
In 750-1,000 words, provide a minimum of four personal examples to illustrate impression management, social tuning, social comparisons, mindsets, intrinsic/extrinsic motivation, or causal theories. One example provided must address face to face versus written communication styles. Are there measures that can be taken when communicating nonverbally to improve self-presentation, impression management, attributional inferences, and cognitive biases? Each example provided should be based upon how your personal views were shaped by parents, teachers, friends, community, culture, etc. Each example should be supported by relevant research. Use two to three scholarly sources to support your thinking, your textbook can be used as one of the resources. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA 7th Edition Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
Identify the New Objectivity artists and titles of artworks.
Please respond to all questions in the prompt of this discussion forum. Your initial post should be 75-150 words in length and is due on Sunday. By Tuesday, you should respond to two additional posts from your peers.
Neue Sachlichkeit (New Objectivity)
The Neue Sachlichkeit or New Objectivity modern art movement in Germany occurred after WWI. Artists George Grosz, Max Beckmann and Otto Dix use their art to criticize corruption in society.among the ruling classes in the Weimar Republic. Select two artworks by two different artists and explain how the content and style of their paintings illustrate their political and social corruption in society. See pp. 912-914 Kleiner, Ch 29 and Neue Sachlichkeit (New Objectivity) – An Introduction (article) | Khan Academy
Include the following aspects in the discussion:
- Identify the New Objectivity artists and titles of artworks.
- Interpret the iconography or content of the artworks.
- Explain how the style, realism, caricature or abstraction contributes to the overall meaning of the artworks
Identify a company that could benefit from better use of social media.
Many digital and social media sites are widely used in marketing strategies.
Prepare a 10- to 15-slide presentation with detailed speaker’s notes and visuals elements.
Complete the following in your presentation:
· Identify a company that could benefit from better use of social media.
· Analyze at least 10 digital and social media channels and describe the strengths and weaknesses of each of these as a marketing tool for this company.
· Design an online strategy that maximizes the use of some or all of the digital and social media channels, as appropriate, based on your analysis.
· Determine key performance indicators to measure the success of the online strategy.
Format your citations according to APA guidelines.
Select a theory discussed in class that you believe provides the most sufficient explanation of how and why delinquency occurs.
Sociological Analysis of Juvenile Delinquency
Theories of Delinquency Reflection Paper
Select a theory discussed in class that you believe provides the most sufficient explanation of how and why delinquency occurs. Your paper should address a) the major points of the theory and historical development (if applicable), b) how and why the theory relates to delinquency, and c) the potential critiques/shortcomings of the theory. Your paper is required to be 3-4 FULL pages in length, double-spaced, 12-point font, and closely resemble the example posted in D2L. You are expected to use a minimum three outside sources. These sources must be reputable and cited appropriately using APA citation style. If you have any questions about how to cite in APA format, please look at the resources available to you in D2L. When in doubt about the reputability of a source, please ask.
Discuss similarities and differences of recent laws.
View the video on Rosa’s Law at http://tinyurl.com/hhbhyem.
Discuss various laws relating to the treatment of the disabled and their intent. Early laws were permissive but now they are mandatory.
Discuss similarities and differences of recent laws.
What are some of the ramifications (both positive and negative) of these laws now becoming mandatory?
What was the outcome of the conversation? Was it positive or negative? Could anything have been done to make it better?
chose a film and observe the interpersonal communication
- A brief paragraph that describes the scene that you have chosen and the characters involved. This should give an overview of what took place in the scene.
- An analysis of the verbal and nonverbal communication that took place between the characters in that scene. You should be looking at the different verbal communication concepts and nonverbal communication types you see taking place in the scene. You will want to write about these, pointing to the specific cues from the scene that are showing the concept or type of communication that you identified.
- What was the outcome of the conversation? Was it positive or negative? Could anything have been done to make it better?
