Describe a common claim, not in favor of inclusion, that this article could counter argue.

Philosophy of Inclusion Research Support Template

Part 1: Journal Article Reviews

Research three scholarly articles about the benefits of including students with disabilities in general education classrooms.

Article 1 Title:
Summary(Summarize how the article supports a philosophy of inclusion.)
Common Argument(Describe a common claim, not in favor of inclusion, that this article could counter argue.)
Future Professional Practice Application(Explain how you could apply this information to your own future professional practice.)
Reference(Article citation)
Article 2 Title:
Summary(Summarize how the article supports a philosophy of inclusion.)
Common Argument(Describe a common claim, not in favor of inclusion, that this article could counter argue.)
Future Professional Practice Application(Explain how you could apply this information to your own future professional practice.)
Reference(Article citation)
Article 3 Title:
Summary(Summarize how the article supports a philosophy of inclusion.)
Common Argument(Describe a common claim, not in favor of inclusion, that this article could counter argue.)
Future Professional Practice Application(Explain how you could apply this information to your own future professional practice.)
Reference(Article citation)

Part 2: Philosophy of Inclusion

In 250 words or less, compose your own philosophy of inclusion describing how inclusion supports creating a safe, inclusive, positive learning environment to engage and promote the well-being of individuals with disabilities. Use the articles reviewed in Part 1 of this assignment to support your philosophy.

Part 3: Communicating Your Philosophy

In 250-500 words, describe how you might effectively communicate your philosophy of inclusion to a school leader to build positivity toward inclusion and promote the well-being of students with disabilities. Address how you would persuade a colleague who does not believe in inclusion to share your philosophy. Support both positions using at least one of the articles reviewed in Part 1.

References