Module 02 discussion disorders of the central nervous system
ÿÿ
You are preparing to work as a nurse in the neurology unit. The preceptor informs you to be prepared to discuss the following topics as they are commonly seen on the unit. In order to prepare, choose one of the following topics of interest as your initial discussion posting. Use this course?s resources and one evidenced-based article to explore the topic of your choice.
How do you assess a ÿÿÿÿÿclient when the nurse suspects onset of CVA?
Provide discharge ÿÿÿÿÿinformation for a client with mild TBI.
Discuss surgical ÿÿÿÿÿmanagement of brain tumors.
Describe postoperative ÿÿÿÿÿcomplications of a craniotomy.
When responding to the initial posting, provide an evidence-based article to support your response. Respond to two other topics different than your initial topic with a reference.
Due dates for your initial post (4/13/2023, 11:59 pm) and two response posts by April 15, 11:59 pm)
SON Discussion Rubric
Levels of Achievement
Discussion Rubric Criteria (Points)
Initial Posting Comprehension – ÿÿÿÿÿPoints 12
Initial post does not include ÿÿÿÿÿexplanations with examples or supporting evidence. Failure to ÿÿÿÿÿsubmit initial posting will result in zero points for this criteria. ÿÿÿÿÿ– Points 9
Initial post includes brief explanation ÿÿÿÿÿwith limited or unclear examples and limited supporting evidence. – Points ÿÿÿÿÿ10
Initial post includes clear ÿÿÿÿÿexplanation with examples and supporting evidence. – Points 11
Initial post includes ÿÿÿÿÿcomprehensive explanation with detailed examples and supporting evidence. ÿÿÿÿÿPoints 12
Response Posting Reasoning – ÿÿÿÿÿPoints 12
Response to peers attempts to ÿÿÿÿÿcontribute to the discussion but lacks suggestions and/or supporting ÿÿÿÿÿevidence. Failure to submit response postings will result in zero ÿÿÿÿÿpoints for this criteria. – Points 9
Response to peers provides ÿÿÿÿÿminimal contributions and suggestions with limited or no supporting ÿÿÿÿÿevidence. – Points 10
Response to peers contributes ÿÿÿÿÿto the discussion with suggestions and supporting evidence. – Points 11
Response to peers offers ÿÿÿÿÿsubstantial contributions and detailed suggestions with supporting ÿÿÿÿÿevidence. – Points 12
Spelling and Grammar – Points 3
Spelling and grammar contain ÿÿÿÿÿsubstantial errors that makes sentences and/or paragraphs incoherent. – ÿÿÿÿÿPoint 0
Spelling and grammar errors ÿÿÿÿÿoccur but are inconsistent. Paragraphs and sentences are coherent but may ÿÿÿÿÿexhibit spelling errors, run-on?s or fragments, and/or improper verb tense ÿÿÿÿÿusage. – Point 1
Displays proper grammar ÿÿÿÿÿapplication and writing contains minimal to no spelling errors. May ÿÿÿÿÿcontain rare improper uses of words (ex., their vs. there), a misplaced ÿÿÿÿÿmodifier, or a run-on sentence, but does not detract from the overall ÿÿÿÿÿunderstanding of the sentence and/or paragraph. – Points 2
Demonstrates an exemplary ÿÿÿÿÿapplication of spelling and grammar. – Points 3
APA Citation – Points 3
Citations do not follow APA ÿÿÿÿÿStyle. Quotations, paraphrases, and summaries are not cited, or there is ÿÿÿÿÿno attempt to cite them using APA style. – Point 0
Errors in APA citations are ÿÿÿÿÿnoticeable and may detract from the ability to locate the original source ÿÿÿÿÿ(for example, no title provided, year of publication is missing, no ÿÿÿÿÿpunctuation). – Point 1
Errors in APA citations are ÿÿÿÿÿless noticeable and do not detract from the ability to locate the original ÿÿÿÿÿsource (for example, a missing or misused comma or period, missing ÿÿÿÿÿparentheses, author name not properly abbreviated, indentation is ÿÿÿÿÿmisaligned). – Points 2
APA citations are free of style ÿÿÿÿÿand formatting errors. – Points 3
Total Points Possible : 30
