‘There is no significant difference between the ‘shareholder’ and the ‘stakeholder’ models of corporate governance in terms of being superior at monitoring management behaviour: ultimately, greedy people will always find a way to cheat the system.’ Discuss.

TOPIC 2: ‘There is no significant difference between the ‘shareholder’ and the ‘stakeholder’ models of corporate governance in terms of being superior at monitoring management behaviour: ultimately, greedy people will always find a way to cheat the system.’ Discuss.
·        Chang, H-O (2009) 23 Things they don’t tell you about capitalism. London: Penguin.
·        Dirty Money (USA, 2018) Series 1. Episode 1: Hard NOx.
·        Deakin, S. and Konzelmann, S. J. (2003) After ENRON: An Age of Enlightenment? Organization, Vol. 10, Issue 3, pp. 583-587.
·        Dore, R. (2006) Stock Market Capitalism, Welfare Capitalism. Japan and Germany versus the Anglo-Saxons, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Chapter 4: Corporate Governance: From the employee-favouring firm to the shareholder-favouring firm (pp. 71-132).
·        Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room (2005)
·        Koen, C. I. (2005) Comparative International Management, London: McGraw-Hill. Chapter 6: Comparative Corporate Governance
·        Lazonick, W. and O’Sullivan, M. (2000) ‘Maximizing shareholder value: a new ideology for corporate governance’. Economy and Society, 29, 13-35.
·        Page, (2012) Co-determination in Germany: A Beginners Guide.
·        Sorge, A., Noorderhaven, N., and Koen, C. (2015) Comparative International Management. Second Edition. Abingdon: Routledge. Chapter 6: Comparative Corporate Governance
 
TOPIC 3: ‘Cooperative economies are obviously better than conflictual economies’ Discuss.
·        Budd, J. W. (2004a) Achieving Decent Work by Giving Employment and Human Face. Geneva: ILO.
·        Budd, J. W. (2004b) Labour Relations: Striking a Balance. NY: McGraw-Hill. Chapter 2: Labour Unions: Good or Bad?
·        Gordon, D. M. 1996) Fat and Mean: The Corporate Squeeze of Working Americans and the Myth of Managerial Downsizing, New York: Free Press. Introduction; Chapter 3: The Stick Strategy (pp. 61-94), and Chapter 6: We Take the Low Road (pp. 144-171).
·        Human Rights Watch (2000) Unfair Advantage: Workers’ Freedom of Association in the United States under International Human Rights Standards.
·         HYPERLINK “http://www.hrw.org/en/reports/2000/08/01/unfair-advantage-workers-freedom-association-united-states-under-international-hu” \t “_blank” http://www.hrw.org/en/reports/2000/08/01/unfair-advantage-workers-freedom-association-united-states-under-international-hu
·        Logan, J. (2004) The Fine Art of Union Busting, New Labor Forum, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 77-91.
·        Prasch (1998) Corporate Strategy and the American Standard of Living: Reviewing Gordon’s Fat and Mean. Review of Political Economy, 10:1.
·        Readings by Hyman, Budd, Estreicher and Bamber in: Symposium on John W. Budd: Employment with a HumanFace: Four Views on Efficiency, Equity, and Voice in the World of Work. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, Vol. 17, No. 2, June 2005.
·        Wilkinson, R. And Pickett, K. (2009) The Spirit Level: Why Equality is Better for Everyone. London: Penguin.

× How can I help you?